Comparative Effectiveness of Digitally and Conventionally Fabricated Occlusal Splints with Low-Power Laser Therapy in Treating Temporomandibular Disorders.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of lasers in medical sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jlms.2025.55
Rahab Ghoveizi, Leili Habibi, Elaheh Beyabanaki, Sara Tavakolizadeh, Hossein Akbari
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Digitally and Conventionally Fabricated Occlusal Splints with Low-Power Laser Therapy in Treating Temporomandibular Disorders.","authors":"Rahab Ghoveizi, Leili Habibi, Elaheh Beyabanaki, Sara Tavakolizadeh, Hossein Akbari","doi":"10.34172/jlms.2025.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is common, and occlusal splints (OSs) and low-power laser (LPL) therapy are effective conservative treatments. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of conventionally and digitally fabricated OS, with and without LPL, in treating TMD patients. <b>Methods:</b> Forty patients diagnosed with TMDs were randomly assigned to four treatment groups. The first group received LPL therapy in conjunction with digitally fabricated OS. The second group was treated with LPL therapy and conventionally fabricated OS. The third group received digitally made OS without LPL, and the fourth group was provided with conventionally fabricated OS without LPL. Patients' pain levels were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment (pre-treatment) and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment. The Association of Dental Research (IADR) scale was used to measure mouth opening and mandibular movements. Additionally, the physical characteristics of the OS were assessed over the 3-month period, including their resistance to failure, color change, and the level of patient satisfaction with the treatments. <b>Results:</b> There were no statistically significant differences in color change or failure rates between conventionally and digitally fabricated occlusal splints after three months (<i>P</i>>0.05). Likewise, patient satisfaction levels did not differ significantly between the two splint types (<i>P</i>>0.05). However, the conventionally fabricated splints required significantly more adjustment points and a longer delivery time (<i>P</i><0.05). All four treatment groups experienced a significant reduction in pain intensity following the interventions (<i>P</i><0.05). Additionally, the group receiving low-power laser therapy with digitally fabricated splints demonstrated greater improvements in all three movement parameters (<i>P</i><0.05). <b>Conclusion:</b> The use of a combined treatment approach, involving a digitally-fabricated OS and LPL therapy could yield greater benefits for patients with TMDs in terms of pain reduction and functional improvements.</p>","PeriodicalId":16224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","volume":"16 ","pages":"e55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2025.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is common, and occlusal splints (OSs) and low-power laser (LPL) therapy are effective conservative treatments. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of conventionally and digitally fabricated OS, with and without LPL, in treating TMD patients. Methods: Forty patients diagnosed with TMDs were randomly assigned to four treatment groups. The first group received LPL therapy in conjunction with digitally fabricated OS. The second group was treated with LPL therapy and conventionally fabricated OS. The third group received digitally made OS without LPL, and the fourth group was provided with conventionally fabricated OS without LPL. Patients' pain levels were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment (pre-treatment) and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months post-treatment. The Association of Dental Research (IADR) scale was used to measure mouth opening and mandibular movements. Additionally, the physical characteristics of the OS were assessed over the 3-month period, including their resistance to failure, color change, and the level of patient satisfaction with the treatments. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in color change or failure rates between conventionally and digitally fabricated occlusal splints after three months (P>0.05). Likewise, patient satisfaction levels did not differ significantly between the two splint types (P>0.05). However, the conventionally fabricated splints required significantly more adjustment points and a longer delivery time (P<0.05). All four treatment groups experienced a significant reduction in pain intensity following the interventions (P<0.05). Additionally, the group receiving low-power laser therapy with digitally fabricated splints demonstrated greater improvements in all three movement parameters (P<0.05). Conclusion: The use of a combined treatment approach, involving a digitally-fabricated OS and LPL therapy could yield greater benefits for patients with TMDs in terms of pain reduction and functional improvements.

数字与传统制作的咬合夹板低功率激光治疗颞下颌疾病的疗效比较。
颞下颌紊乱(Temporomandibular disorder, TMD)是一种常见的疾病,咬合夹板(occlal splint, OSs)和低功率激光(low-power laser, LPL)治疗是一种有效的保守治疗方法。本研究的目的是比较传统和数字制作的OS,在有和没有LPL的情况下治疗TMD患者的有效性。方法:将40例确诊为tmd的患者随机分为4个治疗组。第一组接受LPL治疗并结合数字制作的OS。第二组采用LPL治疗和常规制作的OS。第三组接受数字制作的无LPL操作系统,第四组接受常规制作的无LPL操作系统。在治疗前(治疗前)、治疗后1周、1个月和3个月采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估患者的疼痛水平。采用牙科研究协会(Association of Dental Research, IADR)量表测量口腔张开度和下颌运动。此外,在3个月的时间内评估OS的物理特征,包括它们对失败的抵抗力,颜色变化和患者对治疗的满意度。结果:3个月后,常规和数字制作的咬合夹板的颜色变化和故障率差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。同样,患者满意度在两种夹板类型之间无显著差异(P < 0.05)。然而,传统制作的夹板需要更多的调整点和更长的递送时间(ppp结论:使用一种联合治疗方法,包括数字制作的OS和LPL治疗,可以在减轻疼痛和改善功能方面为TMDs患者带来更大的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of lasers in medical sciences
Journal of lasers in medical sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences " is a scientific quarterly publication of the Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This journal received a scientific and research rank from the national medical publication committee. This Journal accepts original papers, review articles, case reports, brief reports, case series, photo assays, letters to the editor, and commentaries in the field of laser, or light in any fields of medicine such as the following medical specialties: -Dermatology -General and Vascular Surgery -Oncology -Cardiology -Dentistry -Urology -Rehabilitation -Ophthalmology -Otorhinolaryngology -Gynecology & Obstetrics -Internal Medicine -Orthopedics -Neurosurgery -Radiology -Pain Medicine (Algology) -Basic Sciences (Stem cell, Cellular and Molecular application and physic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书