Er:YAG Laser Versus Conventional Surface Treatment of Lithium Disilicate: In Vitro Study.

IF 1.7 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of lasers in medical sciences Pub Date : 2025-11-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34172/jlms.2025.54
Cesar Manuel Poquioma Choque, Rodolfo Calle-Chavez, Fabricio Hinojosa Pedraza, Katherine Joselyn Atoche-Socola
{"title":"Er:YAG Laser Versus Conventional Surface Treatment of Lithium Disilicate: In Vitro Study.","authors":"Cesar Manuel Poquioma Choque, Rodolfo Calle-Chavez, Fabricio Hinojosa Pedraza, Katherine Joselyn Atoche-Socola","doi":"10.34172/jlms.2025.54","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The high-power 2940 nm Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser increases the rough surface of lithium disilicate, increasing the bonding strength of ceramics when they are bonded to the tooth using resin matrix cement. This investigation aimed to compare the Er:YAG laser with the conventional surface treatment of lithium disilicate. <b>Methods:</b> In this study, 50 lithium disilicate discs (5 mm diameter×2 mm thickness) were divided into five groups (n=10): Control group (CG) (10% hydrofluoric acid followed by 37% phosphoric acid), Group 1 (G1) (ER:YAG laser energy of 300 mJ/50 µs), Group 2 (G2) (Er:YAG laser energy of 400 mJ/50 µs), Group 3 (G3) (Er:YAG laser energy of 500 mJ/50 µs), and Group 4 (G4) (10% hydrofluoric acid, Er:YAG laser energy of 500 mJ/50 µs). After completing the surface treatments, 6 mm high Tygon was fixed and filled with self-adhesive dual resin cement (SET PP SDI Limited, Victoria, Australia). The samples were stored for 24 hours and subjected to shear tests until structural failure. <b>Results:</b> ANOVA analysis found no statistically significant difference between the groups analyzed (<i>P</i>=0.0689). G2 had the highest bond strength with 12.6±3.2 MPa, while G1 had the lowest with 9.5±2.2 MPa, followed by the CG 9.8±3.2. It was observed that with higher laser irradiation power, the adhesive strength decreased, as evidenced in G3 with 11.6±1.9 MPa. <b>Conclusion:</b> The radiation power of 400 mJ, frequency of 20 Hz, and pulse duration of 50 µs improved the bond strength between lithium disilicate and dual resin cement. However, the group that obtained the lowest strength was Group 3, with a laser energy of 500 mJ/50 µs, generating highly expulsive zones in lithium disilicate.</p>","PeriodicalId":16224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","volume":"16 ","pages":"e54"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12958272/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of lasers in medical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/jlms.2025.54","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The high-power 2940 nm Er:YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet) laser increases the rough surface of lithium disilicate, increasing the bonding strength of ceramics when they are bonded to the tooth using resin matrix cement. This investigation aimed to compare the Er:YAG laser with the conventional surface treatment of lithium disilicate. Methods: In this study, 50 lithium disilicate discs (5 mm diameter×2 mm thickness) were divided into five groups (n=10): Control group (CG) (10% hydrofluoric acid followed by 37% phosphoric acid), Group 1 (G1) (ER:YAG laser energy of 300 mJ/50 µs), Group 2 (G2) (Er:YAG laser energy of 400 mJ/50 µs), Group 3 (G3) (Er:YAG laser energy of 500 mJ/50 µs), and Group 4 (G4) (10% hydrofluoric acid, Er:YAG laser energy of 500 mJ/50 µs). After completing the surface treatments, 6 mm high Tygon was fixed and filled with self-adhesive dual resin cement (SET PP SDI Limited, Victoria, Australia). The samples were stored for 24 hours and subjected to shear tests until structural failure. Results: ANOVA analysis found no statistically significant difference between the groups analyzed (P=0.0689). G2 had the highest bond strength with 12.6±3.2 MPa, while G1 had the lowest with 9.5±2.2 MPa, followed by the CG 9.8±3.2. It was observed that with higher laser irradiation power, the adhesive strength decreased, as evidenced in G3 with 11.6±1.9 MPa. Conclusion: The radiation power of 400 mJ, frequency of 20 Hz, and pulse duration of 50 µs improved the bond strength between lithium disilicate and dual resin cement. However, the group that obtained the lowest strength was Group 3, with a laser energy of 500 mJ/50 µs, generating highly expulsive zones in lithium disilicate.

Er:YAG激光与传统二硅酸锂表面处理的对比研究。
高功率2940 nm Er:YAG(掺铒钇铝石榴石)激光器增加了二硅酸锂的粗糙表面,增加了陶瓷在树脂基水泥与牙齿结合时的结合强度。本研究旨在比较Er:YAG激光与传统的二硅酸锂表面处理。方法:将50块厚度为5 mm diameter×2 mm的二硅酸锂片分为5组(n=10):对照组(CG)(10%氢氟酸后加37%磷酸)、1组(G1) (ER:YAG激光能量300 mJ/50µs)、2组(G2) (ER:YAG激光能量400 mJ/50µs)、3组(G3) (ER:YAG激光能量500 mJ/50µs)、4组(G4)(10%氢氟酸,ER:YAG激光能量500 mJ/50µs)。完成表面处理后,将6mm高的Tygon固定并填充自粘双树脂水泥(SET PP SDI Limited, Victoria, Australia)。试样保存24小时,进行剪切试验,直至结构破坏。结果:方差分析发现各组间差异无统计学意义(P=0.0689)。G2粘结强度最高,为12.6±3.2 MPa; G1粘结强度最低,为9.5±2.2 MPa; CG粘结强度次之,为9.8±3.2。观察到,随着激光照射功率的增大,粘附强度降低,G3为11.6±1.9 MPa。结论:400 mJ的辐射功率、20 Hz的频率、50µs的脉冲时间提高了二硅酸锂与双树脂水泥的粘结强度。然而,获得最低强度的组是组3,激光能量为500 mJ/50µs,在二硅酸锂中产生高排出区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of lasers in medical sciences
Journal of lasers in medical sciences RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The "Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences " is a scientific quarterly publication of the Laser Application in Medical Sciences Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. This journal received a scientific and research rank from the national medical publication committee. This Journal accepts original papers, review articles, case reports, brief reports, case series, photo assays, letters to the editor, and commentaries in the field of laser, or light in any fields of medicine such as the following medical specialties: -Dermatology -General and Vascular Surgery -Oncology -Cardiology -Dentistry -Urology -Rehabilitation -Ophthalmology -Otorhinolaryngology -Gynecology & Obstetrics -Internal Medicine -Orthopedics -Neurosurgery -Radiology -Pain Medicine (Algology) -Basic Sciences (Stem cell, Cellular and Molecular application and physic)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书