Barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of geriatric oncology Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102933
Kofi Gyasi Agyei , Arul Malhotra , Sally A. Norton , Mostafa Mohamed , Katherine M. Juba , Supriya Mohile , Erika Ramsdale
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators of deprescribing for older adults with cancer and polypharmacy","authors":"Kofi Gyasi Agyei ,&nbsp;Arul Malhotra ,&nbsp;Sally A. Norton ,&nbsp;Mostafa Mohamed ,&nbsp;Katherine M. Juba ,&nbsp;Supriya Mohile ,&nbsp;Erika Ramsdale","doi":"10.1016/j.jgo.2026.102933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Polypharmacy affects up to 93% of older adults with cancer and increases risks of treatment toxicity, drug interactions, and adverse outcomes. Deprescribing, the planned discontinuation of potentially inappropriate medications, can mitigate these risks. However, deprescribing interventions in oncology clinics remain understudied outside palliative care settings. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in the oncology clinic across multiple stakeholder groups.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Between November 2020 and August 2021, virtual focus groups were conducted with five key informant groups: patients (<em>n</em> = 9), primary care physicians (<em>n</em> = 7), oncology pharmacists (n = 7), oncology nurses (n = 7), and oncologists (<em>n</em> = 6). Participants were recruited from the University of Rochester Wilmot Cancer Institute, affiliated sites, and a patient advisory board. Semi-structured interview guides explored topics including polypharmacy definitions, medication communication, workflows, and deprescribing strategies. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive content analysis with MAXQDA software. Two coders performed open coding and developed themes categorized at patient, healthcare provider, and system levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At the patient level, barriers included resistance to change, lack of awareness, mistrust, and health complexity, while facilitators included education/empowerment, effective communication, and caregiver involvement. At the provider level, barriers encompassed knowledge gaps, scope of practice concerns, and time limitations, with facilitators including inter-provider communication, education, longitudinal approaches, and provider maturity. System-level barriers included care fragmentation, electronic health record limitations, and automated workflows, while facilitators emphasized team-based care, decision support tools, and pharmacist integration. Notably, all groups expressed consistent enthusiasm for pharmacist involvement in deprescribing interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>This analysis revealed multilevel barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in older adults with cancer. Mismatches between provider perceptions and patient attitudes suggest opportunities for improved communication. Time constraints and scope of practice concerns were prominent provider barriers, addressable through longitudinal approaches and team-based models. The consistent enthusiasm across all stakeholder groups for pharmacist-led interventions informed the design of a subsequent cluster-randomized trial. These findings suggest scalable interventions leveraging pharmacist expertise and decision support tools to address polypharmacy in this vulnerable population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15943,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric oncology","volume":"17 3","pages":"Article 102933"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1879406826000871","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Polypharmacy affects up to 93% of older adults with cancer and increases risks of treatment toxicity, drug interactions, and adverse outcomes. Deprescribing, the planned discontinuation of potentially inappropriate medications, can mitigate these risks. However, deprescribing interventions in oncology clinics remain understudied outside palliative care settings. This study aimed to identify barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in the oncology clinic across multiple stakeholder groups.

Materials and methods

Between November 2020 and August 2021, virtual focus groups were conducted with five key informant groups: patients (n = 9), primary care physicians (n = 7), oncology pharmacists (n = 7), oncology nurses (n = 7), and oncologists (n = 6). Participants were recruited from the University of Rochester Wilmot Cancer Institute, affiliated sites, and a patient advisory board. Semi-structured interview guides explored topics including polypharmacy definitions, medication communication, workflows, and deprescribing strategies. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive content analysis with MAXQDA software. Two coders performed open coding and developed themes categorized at patient, healthcare provider, and system levels.

Results

At the patient level, barriers included resistance to change, lack of awareness, mistrust, and health complexity, while facilitators included education/empowerment, effective communication, and caregiver involvement. At the provider level, barriers encompassed knowledge gaps, scope of practice concerns, and time limitations, with facilitators including inter-provider communication, education, longitudinal approaches, and provider maturity. System-level barriers included care fragmentation, electronic health record limitations, and automated workflows, while facilitators emphasized team-based care, decision support tools, and pharmacist integration. Notably, all groups expressed consistent enthusiasm for pharmacist involvement in deprescribing interventions.

Discussion

This analysis revealed multilevel barriers and facilitators to deprescribing in older adults with cancer. Mismatches between provider perceptions and patient attitudes suggest opportunities for improved communication. Time constraints and scope of practice concerns were prominent provider barriers, addressable through longitudinal approaches and team-based models. The consistent enthusiasm across all stakeholder groups for pharmacist-led interventions informed the design of a subsequent cluster-randomized trial. These findings suggest scalable interventions leveraging pharmacist expertise and decision support tools to address polypharmacy in this vulnerable population.
老年人癌症和多种药物处方的障碍和促进因素。
导读:多种药物治疗影响到93%的老年癌症患者,并增加了治疗毒性、药物相互作用和不良后果的风险。开处方,计划停止可能不适当的药物,可以减轻这些风险。然而,在姑息治疗设置之外,肿瘤诊所的处方干预仍未得到充分研究。本研究旨在确定肿瘤诊所跨多个利益相关者群体的处方障碍和促进因素。材料和方法:在2020年11月至2021年8月期间,对五个关键信息组进行了虚拟焦点小组:患者(n = 9)、初级保健医生(n = 7)、肿瘤药剂师(n = 7)、肿瘤护士(n = 7)和肿瘤学家(n = 6)。参与者是从罗彻斯特大学威尔莫特癌症研究所、附属网站和患者咨询委员会招募的。半结构化访谈指南探讨的主题包括多药定义、药物沟通、工作流程和处方策略。录音,逐字转录,并使用MAXQDA软件进行归纳内容分析。两名编码员执行开放编码并开发按患者、医疗保健提供者和系统级别分类的主题。结果:在患者层面,障碍包括抗拒改变、缺乏意识、不信任和健康复杂性,而促进因素包括教育/授权、有效沟通和护理人员参与。在提供者层面,障碍包括知识差距、实践关注的范围和时间限制,促进因素包括提供者之间的沟通、教育、纵向方法和提供者成熟度。系统级障碍包括护理碎片化、电子健康记录限制和自动化工作流程,而促进者强调基于团队的护理、决策支持工具和药剂师集成。值得注意的是,所有的小组都表达了对药剂师参与处方干预的一致热情。讨论:该分析揭示了老年癌症患者开处方的多重障碍和促进因素。提供者的看法和患者的态度之间的不匹配表明有机会改善沟通。时间限制和实践范围是主要的供应商障碍,可以通过纵向方法和基于团队的模型来解决。所有利益相关者群体对药剂师主导的干预措施的一贯热情为随后的集群随机试验的设计提供了信息。这些发现建议利用药剂师专业知识和决策支持工具进行可扩展的干预,以解决这一弱势群体的多重用药问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of geriatric oncology
Journal of geriatric oncology ONCOLOGY-GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
379
审稿时长
80 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Geriatric Oncology is an international, multidisciplinary journal which is focused on advancing research in the treatment and survivorship issues of older adults with cancer, as well as literature relevant to education and policy development in geriatric oncology. The journal welcomes the submission of manuscripts in the following categories: • Original research articles • Review articles • Clinical trials • Education and training articles • Short communications • Perspectives • Meeting reports • Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书