Acceptability and Feasibility of Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-Testing as Primary Screening for Cervical Cancer Detection in the State of Alabama.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Community Health Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-06 DOI:10.1007/s10900-026-01554-1
Van Thi Ha Nghiem, Shelita Smith, James Shi, Alexandra McBrayer, Claudia Hardy, Akila Subramaniam, Kevin Fontaine, Renee Heffron, Andrzej Kulczycki
{"title":"Acceptability and Feasibility of Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-Testing as Primary Screening for Cervical Cancer Detection in the State of Alabama.","authors":"Van Thi Ha Nghiem, Shelita Smith, James Shi, Alexandra McBrayer, Claudia Hardy, Akila Subramaniam, Kevin Fontaine, Renee Heffron, Andrzej Kulczycki","doi":"10.1007/s10900-026-01554-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alabama has the highest cervical cancer mortality and sixth highest incidence rates nationwide. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of at-home HPV self-testing for cervical cancer screening in Alabama. Eligible women (ages 30-64y, no Pap last 3.5y, not being pregnant, no hysterectomy history, and satisfying either rural residency or being African American) were recruited by community health workers (CHW), foodbanks, churches, and trusted relationships in targeted communities. Participants received a mailed package including an Evalyn® HPV self-test kit (for analysis against high-risk (HR) HPV-16, -18, and -other HR-groups); and a questionnaire seeking information on health literacy, healthcare experience and attitudes about the HPV self-testing. CHWs recruited 86% of participants. Thirty-five (60%) out of 58 consented-to-participate women returned the completed questionnaires and test kits. Half reported having public insurance, a quarter were uninsured. Half had > 5 sex partners. About 40-77% had incorrect answers to HPV knowledge questions. Ten participants (29%) reported having little trust in doctors. Over 90% of the self-collected samples were analyzable. Three samples were positive with HR-16 and -18 (received referral information for follow-up) but either negative or invalid with other HR-groups, and 29 tests were negative for all HR-groups. Almost all participants (94%) were comfortable with receiving test-kits via mail, and most (83%) preferred home- to clinic-based screening. Overall, HPV self-testing was acceptable among women recruited in community setting. Health literacy, medical trust, and the CHW role can be emphasized in future work to promote HPV self-testing to eliminate cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":15550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Health","volume":" ","pages":"445-455"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13223600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-026-01554-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alabama has the highest cervical cancer mortality and sixth highest incidence rates nationwide. We assessed the acceptability and feasibility of at-home HPV self-testing for cervical cancer screening in Alabama. Eligible women (ages 30-64y, no Pap last 3.5y, not being pregnant, no hysterectomy history, and satisfying either rural residency or being African American) were recruited by community health workers (CHW), foodbanks, churches, and trusted relationships in targeted communities. Participants received a mailed package including an Evalyn® HPV self-test kit (for analysis against high-risk (HR) HPV-16, -18, and -other HR-groups); and a questionnaire seeking information on health literacy, healthcare experience and attitudes about the HPV self-testing. CHWs recruited 86% of participants. Thirty-five (60%) out of 58 consented-to-participate women returned the completed questionnaires and test kits. Half reported having public insurance, a quarter were uninsured. Half had > 5 sex partners. About 40-77% had incorrect answers to HPV knowledge questions. Ten participants (29%) reported having little trust in doctors. Over 90% of the self-collected samples were analyzable. Three samples were positive with HR-16 and -18 (received referral information for follow-up) but either negative or invalid with other HR-groups, and 29 tests were negative for all HR-groups. Almost all participants (94%) were comfortable with receiving test-kits via mail, and most (83%) preferred home- to clinic-based screening. Overall, HPV self-testing was acceptable among women recruited in community setting. Health literacy, medical trust, and the CHW role can be emphasized in future work to promote HPV self-testing to eliminate cervical cancer.

在阿拉巴马州,以家庭为基础的人乳头瘤病毒自我检测作为宫颈癌检测的初级筛查的可接受性和可行性。
阿拉巴马州的宫颈癌死亡率最高,发病率在全国排名第六。我们评估了在阿拉巴马州进行宫颈癌筛查的家庭HPV自我检测的可接受性和可行性。符合条件的妇女(年龄30-64岁,没有Pap超过3.5岁,没有怀孕,没有子宫切除术史,满足农村居住或非裔美国人)由社区卫生工作者(CHW),食物银行,教堂和目标社区的信任关系招募。参与者收到一个邮寄的包裹,其中包括Evalyn®HPV自检试剂盒(用于分析高危(HR) HPV-16, -18和-其他HR组);以及一份关于健康素养、医疗保健经验和对HPV自检态度的问卷。卫生院招募了86%的参与者。58名同意参与的妇女中有35名(60%)归还了填好的问卷和检测包。一半的人有公共保险,四分之一的人没有保险。一半的人有50个性伴侣。约40-77%的人在HPV知识问题上回答错误。10名参与者(29%)表示不太信任医生。超过90%的自采样本可分析。3个样本HR-16和-18阳性(接受转诊信息随访),但其他hr组阴性或无效,所有hr组29项检测均为阴性。几乎所有的参与者(94%)都对通过邮件接收检测试剂盒感到满意,大多数(83%)更喜欢家庭筛查而不是诊所筛查。总体而言,在社区环境中招募的妇女中,HPV自我检测是可以接受的。健康素养、医疗信任和CHW的作用可以在未来的工作中强调,以促进HPV自我检测,以消除宫颈癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
1.70%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Health is a peer-reviewed publication that offers original articles on research, teaching, and the practice of community health and public health. Coverage includes public health, epidemiology, preventive medicine, health promotion, disease prevention, environmental and occupational health, health policy and management, and health disparities. The Journal does not publish articles on clinical medicine. Serving as a forum for the exchange of ideas, the Journal features articles on research that serve the educational needs of public and community health personnel.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书