Determining the incidence of abductor tears in total hip arthroplasty via direct lateral approach: a prospective analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
HIP International Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1177/11207000261417954
Elizabeth A Abe, Alec M Giakas, Matthew B Sherman, Gregory K Deirmengian, Eric B Smith, James J Purtill
{"title":"Determining the incidence of abductor tears in total hip arthroplasty via direct lateral approach: a prospective analysis.","authors":"Elizabeth A Abe, Alec M Giakas, Matthew B Sherman, Gregory K Deirmengian, Eric B Smith, James J Purtill","doi":"10.1177/11207000261417954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Each surgical approach for primary THA has unique advantages. The direct lateral approach (DLA) offers increased visualisation of the gluteus medius and minimus tendons and, consequently, has been suggested to facilitate management of intraoperatively identified abductor tears. However, there remains a paucity of data exploring the frequency of abductor tears in patients undergoing primary THA via DLA. The purpose of this prospective study was to: (1) report the incidence of abductor tears in the DLA patients; and (2) identify risk factors for abductor tears in patients undergoing primary THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis via the DLA by 3 high-volume, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from September 2023 to March 2024 were enrolled. Data on patient demographics and preoperative functional outcome scores were collected. The location, size, and tissue quality for patients with an abductor tear intraoperatively was also recorded. Receiver operating characters (ROC) curve analysis was utilised to determine abductor tear risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 346 patients included in the analysis, 63 (18.2%) had an abductor tear. There was no difference in BMI, laterality, and preoperative functional outcome scores between groups. However, patients with an abductor tear were more likely to be older (70.1 ± 7.9 versus 65.0 ± 9.5 years, <i>p</i> < 0.001), Women (68.3% vs. 31.7%, <i>p</i> = 0.027), and have a higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score (4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.9, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Using ROC curve analysis, patients 68 years of age or older were 2.99 times more likely to have a tear identified. Of all tears, 87.3% of tears were at the anterior aspect of the greater trochanter with a mean size of 26.6 ± 12.1 by 12.9 ± 11.5 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present study, the incidence of abductor tears in patients undergoing primary THA via the DLA was 18.2%. Future studies are needed to compare the implications of abductor tears encountered in primary THA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12911,"journal":{"name":"HIP International","volume":" ","pages":"738-744"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIP International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000261417954","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Each surgical approach for primary THA has unique advantages. The direct lateral approach (DLA) offers increased visualisation of the gluteus medius and minimus tendons and, consequently, has been suggested to facilitate management of intraoperatively identified abductor tears. However, there remains a paucity of data exploring the frequency of abductor tears in patients undergoing primary THA via DLA. The purpose of this prospective study was to: (1) report the incidence of abductor tears in the DLA patients; and (2) identify risk factors for abductor tears in patients undergoing primary THA.

Methods: All patients undergoing primary THA for osteoarthritis via the DLA by 3 high-volume, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons from September 2023 to March 2024 were enrolled. Data on patient demographics and preoperative functional outcome scores were collected. The location, size, and tissue quality for patients with an abductor tear intraoperatively was also recorded. Receiver operating characters (ROC) curve analysis was utilised to determine abductor tear risk factors.

Results: Of the 346 patients included in the analysis, 63 (18.2%) had an abductor tear. There was no difference in BMI, laterality, and preoperative functional outcome scores between groups. However, patients with an abductor tear were more likely to be older (70.1 ± 7.9 versus 65.0 ± 9.5 years, p < 0.001), Women (68.3% vs. 31.7%, p = 0.027), and have a higher age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index score (4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.9, p = 0.002). Using ROC curve analysis, patients 68 years of age or older were 2.99 times more likely to have a tear identified. Of all tears, 87.3% of tears were at the anterior aspect of the greater trochanter with a mean size of 26.6 ± 12.1 by 12.9 ± 11.5 mm.

Conclusions: In the present study, the incidence of abductor tears in patients undergoing primary THA via the DLA was 18.2%. Future studies are needed to compare the implications of abductor tears encountered in primary THA.

通过直接外侧入路确定全髋关节置换术中外展肌撕裂的发生率:一项前瞻性分析。
每一种手术入路都有其独特的优势。直接外侧入路(DLA)增加了臀中、小肌腱的可见性,因此,已被建议用于术中识别外展肌腱撕裂的治疗。然而,对于经DLA行原发性THA的患者外展肌撕裂频率的研究仍然缺乏数据。本前瞻性研究的目的是:(1)报道DLA患者外展肌撕裂的发生率;(2)确定原发性THA患者外展肌撕裂的危险因素。方法:从2023年9月至2024年3月,所有由3名高容量,研究员培训的关节置换外科医生通过DLA接受骨关节炎原发性THA的患者均入组。收集患者人口统计学数据和术前功能结局评分。术中还记录了外展肌撕裂患者的位置、大小和组织质量。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定外展肌撕裂的危险因素。结果:纳入分析的346例患者中,63例(18.2%)有外展肌撕裂。两组之间的BMI、侧边性和术前功能结局评分没有差异。然而,外展肌撕裂患者的年龄更大(70.1±7.9岁比65.0±9.5岁,p p = 0.027),年龄调整后的Charlson合并症指数评分更高(4.0±1.7比3.3±1.9,p = 0.002)。使用ROC曲线分析,68岁及以上的患者发现撕裂的可能性是2.99倍。在所有撕裂中,87.3%的撕裂发生在大转子前部,平均大小为26.6±12.1 × 12.9±11.5 mm。结论:在本研究中,经DLA行原发性THA的患者外展肌撕裂发生率为18.2%。需要进一步的研究来比较原发性THA中所遇到的外展肌撕裂的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HIP International
HIP International 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: HIP International is the official journal of the European Hip Society. It is the only international, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal dedicated to diseases of the hip. HIP International considers contributions relating to hip surgery, traumatology of the hip, prosthetic surgery, biomechanics, and basic sciences relating to the hip. HIP International invites reviews from leading specialists with the aim of informing its readers of current evidence-based best practice. The journal also publishes supplements containing proceedings of symposia, special meetings or articles of special educational merit. HIP International is divided into six independent sections led by editors of the highest scientific merit. These sections are: • Biomaterials • Biomechanics • Conservative Hip Surgery • Paediatrics • Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty • Traumatology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书