Expectations versus reality: Associations among anticipated, natural environment, and laboratory-derived alcohol stimulation, sedation, and reward.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1037/pha0000842
Emily A Atkinson, Niloufar Dousti Mousavi, Daniel J Fridberg
{"title":"Expectations versus reality: Associations among anticipated, natural environment, and laboratory-derived alcohol stimulation, sedation, and reward.","authors":"Emily A Atkinson, Niloufar Dousti Mousavi, Daniel J Fridberg","doi":"10.1037/pha0000842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Subjective responses to alcohol (alcohol stimulation, sedation, liking, and wanting more) are important predictors of hazardous drinking. These are typically measured in real time via fixed-dose laboratory alcohol challenge or ecological momentary assessment (EMA), methods that can be prohibitively time- and resource-intensive. The present study examined the correspondence between self-report measures of anticipated alcohol responses and those same responses measured via the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, and Drug Effects Questionnaire during a naturalistic drinking episode and a controlled laboratory alcohol challenge. Participants were 220 heavy-drinking adults (42% female; <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 26.3 years) who completed the anticipated Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale and the anticipated Drug Effects Questionnaire and versions of these scales during a single high-resolution EMA of a naturalistic drinking episode. A subset of participants (<i>n</i> = 83) also completed versions of these scales during a fixed-dose laboratory alcohol challenge (0.8 g/kg alcohol). Anticipated stimulation, sedation, liking, and wanting more each significantly predicted their corresponding high-resolution EMA counterparts. Models predicting laboratory-derived subjective responses 30 and 60 min after beverage consumption found that alcohol stimulation and sedation were strong predictors of corresponding responses in the lab, but the same was not true for alcohol liking or wanting more. The present study extends prior work and suggests that heavy drinkers can predict their real-time subjective responses to alcohol with relative accuracy. Findings also provide further support for the use of self-report measures of anticipated alcohol responses, particularly stimulation and sedation, when real-time assessment methods (i.e., EMA or laboratory alcohol challenge) are not feasible. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"435-443"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13025791/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subjective responses to alcohol (alcohol stimulation, sedation, liking, and wanting more) are important predictors of hazardous drinking. These are typically measured in real time via fixed-dose laboratory alcohol challenge or ecological momentary assessment (EMA), methods that can be prohibitively time- and resource-intensive. The present study examined the correspondence between self-report measures of anticipated alcohol responses and those same responses measured via the Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, Brief Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale, and Drug Effects Questionnaire during a naturalistic drinking episode and a controlled laboratory alcohol challenge. Participants were 220 heavy-drinking adults (42% female; Mage = 26.3 years) who completed the anticipated Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale and the anticipated Drug Effects Questionnaire and versions of these scales during a single high-resolution EMA of a naturalistic drinking episode. A subset of participants (n = 83) also completed versions of these scales during a fixed-dose laboratory alcohol challenge (0.8 g/kg alcohol). Anticipated stimulation, sedation, liking, and wanting more each significantly predicted their corresponding high-resolution EMA counterparts. Models predicting laboratory-derived subjective responses 30 and 60 min after beverage consumption found that alcohol stimulation and sedation were strong predictors of corresponding responses in the lab, but the same was not true for alcohol liking or wanting more. The present study extends prior work and suggests that heavy drinkers can predict their real-time subjective responses to alcohol with relative accuracy. Findings also provide further support for the use of self-report measures of anticipated alcohol responses, particularly stimulation and sedation, when real-time assessment methods (i.e., EMA or laboratory alcohol challenge) are not feasible. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

期望与现实:预期、自然环境和实验室衍生的酒精刺激、镇静和奖励之间的关系
对酒精的主观反应(酒精刺激、镇静、喜欢和想要更多)是危险饮酒的重要预测因素。这些通常是通过固定剂量实验室酒精挑战或生态瞬时评估(EMA)实时测量的,这些方法可能需要大量的时间和资源。本研究考察了在自然饮酒事件和受控实验室酒精挑战期间,预期酒精反应的自我报告测量与通过双相酒精影响量表、简短双相酒精影响量表和药物影响问卷测量的相同反应之间的对应关系。参与者为220名重度饮酒的成年人(42%为女性,年龄26.3岁),他们完成了预期的双相酒精影响量表和预期的药物影响问卷,并在一次自然饮酒发作的单次高分辨率EMA期间完成了这些量表的版本。一部分参与者(n = 83)也在固定剂量的实验室酒精刺激(0.8 g/kg酒精)期间完成了这些量表的版本。预期刺激、镇静、喜欢和想要更多都能显著预测相应的高分辨率EMA。预测饮料消费后30和60分钟的实验室衍生主观反应的模型发现,酒精刺激和镇静是实验室中相应反应的有力预测因子,但对于喜欢或想要更多的酒精来说,情况并非如此。目前的研究扩展了之前的工作,表明重度饮酒者可以相对准确地预测他们对酒精的实时主观反应。当实时评估方法(即EMA或实验室酒精刺激)不可行时,研究结果还进一步支持使用自我报告测量预期酒精反应,特别是刺激和镇静反应。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书