Patterns of respectful care and mistreatment during childbirth in relation to perinatal mental health: a secondary analysis of listening to mothers in California

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Stacey Iobst, Elise Erickson
{"title":"Patterns of respectful care and mistreatment during childbirth in relation to perinatal mental health: a secondary analysis of listening to mothers in California","authors":"Stacey Iobst,&nbsp;Elise Erickson","doi":"10.1007/s00737-025-01656-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Despite mental health conditions being the leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States, the relationship between perinatal mental health and mistreatment during childbirth has been insufficiently examined. The objective was to identify patterns of respectful care and mistreatment during childbirth and examine associations with perinatal mental health.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional secondary analysis of Listening to Mothers in California (<i>N</i> = 2,539). We conducted latent class analysis of indicator variables describing rough or rude care, discriminatory treatment, support, communication, and encouragement of autonomous decision-making. We conducted multinomial logistic regression to examine symptomatology for antenatal anxiety and antenatal depression in relation to class membership. Logistic regression was used to examine class membership in relation to symptomatology for postpartum anxiety and postpartum depression.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Four latent classes were identified: Class 1 (84.54%): Respected/Supported, Class 2 (6.69%): Not Supported, Class 3 (5.39%): Rough/Rude, Class 4 (3.38%): Rough/Rude/Discriminated. Women with antenatal depression symptomatology were 3.28 times as likely to be classified in Class 4 versus Class 1 (aRRR 3.28, CI95% 1.88–5.73). Women with antenatal anxiety symptomatology had a higher risk of classification in Class 4 than Class 1 (aRRR 2.04, CI95% 1.21–3.43). Compared to women in Class 1, women in Class 2 had 2.06 higher adjusted risk of postpartum anxiety (aRRR 2.06, CI95% 1.26–3.36).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Women who were symptomatic for antenatal anxiety or antenatal depression were at increased risk for mistreatment and not receiving support during childbirth. Women who did not feel supported had increased risk of symptomatology for postpartum anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8369,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","volume":"29 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00737-025-01656-0.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Women's Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00737-025-01656-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Despite mental health conditions being the leading cause of maternal mortality in the United States, the relationship between perinatal mental health and mistreatment during childbirth has been insufficiently examined. The objective was to identify patterns of respectful care and mistreatment during childbirth and examine associations with perinatal mental health.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional secondary analysis of Listening to Mothers in California (N = 2,539). We conducted latent class analysis of indicator variables describing rough or rude care, discriminatory treatment, support, communication, and encouragement of autonomous decision-making. We conducted multinomial logistic regression to examine symptomatology for antenatal anxiety and antenatal depression in relation to class membership. Logistic regression was used to examine class membership in relation to symptomatology for postpartum anxiety and postpartum depression.

Results

Four latent classes were identified: Class 1 (84.54%): Respected/Supported, Class 2 (6.69%): Not Supported, Class 3 (5.39%): Rough/Rude, Class 4 (3.38%): Rough/Rude/Discriminated. Women with antenatal depression symptomatology were 3.28 times as likely to be classified in Class 4 versus Class 1 (aRRR 3.28, CI95% 1.88–5.73). Women with antenatal anxiety symptomatology had a higher risk of classification in Class 4 than Class 1 (aRRR 2.04, CI95% 1.21–3.43). Compared to women in Class 1, women in Class 2 had 2.06 higher adjusted risk of postpartum anxiety (aRRR 2.06, CI95% 1.26–3.36).

Conclusions

Women who were symptomatic for antenatal anxiety or antenatal depression were at increased risk for mistreatment and not receiving support during childbirth. Women who did not feel supported had increased risk of symptomatology for postpartum anxiety.

分娩期间尊重照料和虐待模式与围产期心理健康的关系:对加利福尼亚州母亲意见的二次分析
目的:尽管心理健康状况是美国孕产妇死亡的主要原因,但围产期心理健康与分娩期间虐待之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。目的是确定分娩期间尊重和虐待的模式,并检查与围产期心理健康的关系。方法我们对加利福尼亚州的母亲倾听进行了横断面二次分析(N = 2539)。我们对描述粗暴照顾、歧视性待遇、支持、沟通和鼓励自主决策的指标变量进行了潜在类分析。我们采用多项逻辑回归来检查与班级成员有关的产前焦虑和产前抑郁的症状。采用Logistic回归检验班级成员与产后焦虑和产后抑郁症状的关系。结果共识别出4个潜在类别:第1类(84.54%):尊重/支持,第2类(6.69%):不支持,第3类(5.39%):粗糙/粗鲁,第4类(3.38%):粗糙/粗鲁/歧视。有产前抑郁症状的妇女被分类为4类的可能性是1类的3.28倍(aRRR 3.28, CI95% 1.88-5.73)。有产前焦虑症状的妇女被分类为第4类的风险高于第1类(aRRR 2.04, CI95% 1.21-3.43)。与1班相比,2班产后焦虑调整风险高2.06 (aRRR 2.06, CI95% 1.26-3.36)。结论有产前焦虑或抑郁症状的妇女在分娩过程中受到虐待和得不到支持的风险增加。感觉得不到支持的妇女出现产后焦虑症状的风险增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Women's Mental Health
Archives of Women's Mental Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Women’s Mental Health is the official journal of the International Association for Women''s Mental Health, Marcé Society and the North American Society for Psychosocial Obstetrics and Gynecology (NASPOG). The exchange of knowledge between psychiatrists and obstetrician-gynecologists is one of the major aims of the journal. Its international scope includes psychodynamics, social and biological aspects of all psychiatric and psychosomatic disorders in women. The editors especially welcome interdisciplinary studies, focussing on the interface between psychiatry, psychosomatics, obstetrics and gynecology. Archives of Women’s Mental Health publishes rigorously reviewed research papers, short communications, case reports, review articles, invited editorials, historical perspectives, book reviews, letters to the editor, as well as conference abstracts. Only contributions written in English will be accepted. The journal assists clinicians, teachers and researchers to incorporate knowledge of all aspects of women’s mental health into current and future clinical care and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书