Is College Really “the” Equalizer? New Evidence Addressing Unobserved Selection

IF 2.8 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Haowen Zheng, Robert Andersen , Anders Holm, Kristian Bernt Karlson
{"title":"Is College Really “the” Equalizer? New Evidence Addressing Unobserved Selection","authors":"Haowen Zheng, Robert Andersen , Anders Holm, Kristian Bernt Karlson","doi":"10.15195/v13.a10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Influential research shows that college graduates achieve similar labor market outcomes regardless of socioeconomic origin, leading to the view that a college degree is a “great equalizer.” Still, other evidence suggests that family background continues to shape labor market outcomes long after graduation, implying that college’s equalizing effect may largely reflect the characteristics of those who pursue higher education. However, the role of unobserved selection into college has rarely been examined. After formally illustrating how this unobserved selection can bias estimates of the college effect, we present new analyses that correct for this bias using an instrumental-variable approach on white male respondents in the 1979 cohort of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The selection-corrected results suggest that intergenerational mobility is similar among college graduates and nongraduates. Although college yields substantial returns for all, these returns do not differ by family background. We conclude that for higher education to serve as a true equalizer, it must become both less selective and more accessible to students from disadvantaged backgrounds.","PeriodicalId":22029,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Science","volume":"64 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15195/v13.a10","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Influential research shows that college graduates achieve similar labor market outcomes regardless of socioeconomic origin, leading to the view that a college degree is a “great equalizer.” Still, other evidence suggests that family background continues to shape labor market outcomes long after graduation, implying that college’s equalizing effect may largely reflect the characteristics of those who pursue higher education. However, the role of unobserved selection into college has rarely been examined. After formally illustrating how this unobserved selection can bias estimates of the college effect, we present new analyses that correct for this bias using an instrumental-variable approach on white male respondents in the 1979 cohort of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. The selection-corrected results suggest that intergenerational mobility is similar among college graduates and nongraduates. Although college yields substantial returns for all, these returns do not differ by family background. We conclude that for higher education to serve as a true equalizer, it must become both less selective and more accessible to students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
大学真的是“均衡器”吗?解决未观察选择的新证据
有影响力的研究表明,无论社会经济背景如何,大学毕业生在劳动力市场上的表现都是相似的,这导致了大学学位是“伟大的均衡器”的观点。然而,其他证据表明,家庭背景在毕业后很长一段时间内仍在影响劳动力市场的结果,这意味着大学的均衡效应可能在很大程度上反映了那些追求高等教育的人的特点。然而,未观察到的大学录取的作用很少被研究。在正式说明了这种未观察到的选择如何使大学效应的估计产生偏差之后,我们提出了新的分析,使用工具变量方法对1979年全国青年纵向调查队列中的白人男性受访者进行了纠正这种偏差。经过选择校正的结果表明,大学毕业生和非大学毕业生的代际流动性相似。虽然上大学对所有人都有可观的回报,但这些回报并不因家庭背景而异。我们的结论是,高等教育要想真正起到均衡器的作用,就必须减少对来自弱势背景的学生的选择性,并让他们更容易接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociological Science
Sociological Science Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Sociological Science is an open-access, online, peer-reviewed, international journal for social scientists committed to advancing a general understanding of social processes. Sociological Science welcomes original research and commentary from all subfields of sociology, and does not privilege any particular theoretical or methodological approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书