Proactive risk analysis in chemotherapy nursing processes: A systematic review of FMEA/FMECA applications.

IF 0.8
Gennaro Laus, Giuseppe Bertozzi, Aldo Di Fazio, Federico Ruta, Tommaso Cassano, Sipontina Rita Zerulo
{"title":"Proactive risk analysis in chemotherapy nursing processes: A systematic review of FMEA/FMECA applications.","authors":"Gennaro Laus, Giuseppe Bertozzi, Aldo Di Fazio, Federico Ruta, Tommaso Cassano, Sipontina Rita Zerulo","doi":"10.1177/09246479261432846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundChemotherapy management is a high-risk process, especially in oncology nursing, where errors can have serious consequences. Proactive risk analysis tools such as Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and its variant with Criticality Analysis (FMECA) are increasingly used to enhance safety.AimTo systematically review the effectiveness of FMEA/FMECA methodologies in identifying and mitigating risks within nursing processes related to chemotherapy preparation, administration, and management.MethodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature was searched in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (as of February 9, 2025), including studies published from 2016 onwards in English, Italian, or Spanish. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a qualitative synthesis was performed.ResultsThirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. FMEA/FMECA proved effective in identifying vulnerabilities in chemotherapy workflows, leading to the implementation of preventive and corrective actions. Improvements were observed in patient and staff safety, error reduction, process standardization, and integration of technological solutions.ConclusionFMEA/FMECA are valuable tools in proactively managing risks in oncology nursing. Their success depends on the active involvement of nursing staff and continuous training. Routine use is recommended to improve care quality and occupational safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":520800,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"9246479261432846"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479261432846","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundChemotherapy management is a high-risk process, especially in oncology nursing, where errors can have serious consequences. Proactive risk analysis tools such as Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) and its variant with Criticality Analysis (FMECA) are increasingly used to enhance safety.AimTo systematically review the effectiveness of FMEA/FMECA methodologies in identifying and mitigating risks within nursing processes related to chemotherapy preparation, administration, and management.MethodsA systematic review was conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Literature was searched in PubMed and the Cochrane Library (as of February 9, 2025), including studies published from 2016 onwards in English, Italian, or Spanish. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and a qualitative synthesis was performed.ResultsThirteen studies met the inclusion criteria. FMEA/FMECA proved effective in identifying vulnerabilities in chemotherapy workflows, leading to the implementation of preventive and corrective actions. Improvements were observed in patient and staff safety, error reduction, process standardization, and integration of technological solutions.ConclusionFMEA/FMECA are valuable tools in proactively managing risks in oncology nursing. Their success depends on the active involvement of nursing staff and continuous training. Routine use is recommended to improve care quality and occupational safety.

化疗护理过程中的主动风险分析:FMEA/FMECA应用的系统回顾。
化疗管理是一个高风险的过程,特别是在肿瘤护理中,错误可能会导致严重的后果。主动风险分析工具,如失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)及其与临界性分析(FMECA)的变体越来越多地用于提高安全性。目的系统地回顾FMEA/FMECA方法在识别和减轻与化疗准备、给药和管理相关的护理过程中的风险方面的有效性。方法按照PRISMA 2020指南进行系统评价。在PubMed和Cochrane图书馆检索文献(截至2025年2月9日),包括2016年以来以英语、意大利语或西班牙语发表的研究。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的质量,并进行定性综合。结果13项研究符合纳入标准。事实证明,FMEA/FMECA在识别化疗工作流程中的漏洞方面是有效的,从而导致预防和纠正措施的实施。在患者和工作人员的安全、减少错误、流程标准化和技术解决方案的集成方面观察到改善。结论fmea /FMECA是肿瘤护理中前瞻性风险管理的有效工具。它们的成功取决于护理人员的积极参与和持续的培训。建议常规使用,以提高护理质量和职业安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书