POEM for Zenker’s diverticulum (Z-POEM): Technical advances, challenges and complications – a narrative review

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Clinics Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-03 DOI:10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.100897
Ygor Rocha Fernandes , Mateus Pereira Funari , Christiano Makoto Sakai , Fauze Maluf-Filho
{"title":"POEM for Zenker’s diverticulum (Z-POEM): Technical advances, challenges and complications – a narrative review","authors":"Ygor Rocha Fernandes ,&nbsp;Mateus Pereira Funari ,&nbsp;Christiano Makoto Sakai ,&nbsp;Fauze Maluf-Filho","doi":"10.1016/j.clinsp.2026.100897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background/Aims</h3><div>Zenker's Diverticulum (ZD) is a pharyngoesophageal pulsion diverticulum traditionally managed with open surgical or endoscopic (rigid and flexible) techniques. Zenker’s Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (Z-POEM) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative demonstrating promising efficacy and safety. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding the technical evolution of Z-POEM, its indications, procedural nuances, long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and future directions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A structured narrative review was conducted in accordance with SANRA guidelines to assess the technical modifications, clinical outcomes, and complications of Zenker’s Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (Z-POEM). Relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2025 was systematically searched across PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE, supplemented by manual citation tracing. Eligible studies included clinical trials, cohorts, observational reports, and technical notes focusing on Z-POEM or its variants. Data extraction and synthesis were performed independently by two reviewers, with findings organized into thematic domains comprising procedural techniques, efficacy, safety, adverse events, recurrence, and follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Proper patient selection is critical for technical success. Factors such as diverticulum size, symptom severity, and anatomical features guide the optimal technique. Long-term studies report sustained clinical success exceeding 85% over 30‒40 months. Repeat Z-POEM procedures have shown high efficacy in managing recurrence. Comparative data indicate Z-POEM achieves superior clinical outcomes compared with flexible endoscopic septotomy, with comparable safety and procedure times.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Z-POEM demonstrates high safety and efficacy, though long-term durability may favor Z-POEM in larger or fibrotic diverticula. Further research should focus on cost-effectiveness, technique standardization, and long-term comparative outcomes to refine patient selection criteria and consolidate Z-POEM as a first-line therapy for ZD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10472,"journal":{"name":"Clinics","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 100897"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1807593226000384","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims

Zenker's Diverticulum (ZD) is a pharyngoesophageal pulsion diverticulum traditionally managed with open surgical or endoscopic (rigid and flexible) techniques. Zenker’s Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (Z-POEM) has recently emerged as a minimally invasive alternative demonstrating promising efficacy and safety. This narrative review aims to synthesize current evidence regarding the technical evolution of Z-POEM, its indications, procedural nuances, long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and future directions.

Methods

A structured narrative review was conducted in accordance with SANRA guidelines to assess the technical modifications, clinical outcomes, and complications of Zenker’s Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (Z-POEM). Relevant literature published between January 2016 and September 2025 was systematically searched across PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE, supplemented by manual citation tracing. Eligible studies included clinical trials, cohorts, observational reports, and technical notes focusing on Z-POEM or its variants. Data extraction and synthesis were performed independently by two reviewers, with findings organized into thematic domains comprising procedural techniques, efficacy, safety, adverse events, recurrence, and follow-up.

Results

Proper patient selection is critical for technical success. Factors such as diverticulum size, symptom severity, and anatomical features guide the optimal technique. Long-term studies report sustained clinical success exceeding 85% over 30‒40 months. Repeat Z-POEM procedures have shown high efficacy in managing recurrence. Comparative data indicate Z-POEM achieves superior clinical outcomes compared with flexible endoscopic septotomy, with comparable safety and procedure times.

Conclusions

Z-POEM demonstrates high safety and efficacy, though long-term durability may favor Z-POEM in larger or fibrotic diverticula. Further research should focus on cost-effectiveness, technique standardization, and long-term comparative outcomes to refine patient selection criteria and consolidate Z-POEM as a first-line therapy for ZD.
Zenker憩室(Z-POEM):技术进步,挑战和并发症-叙述性回顾。
背景/目的:Zenker氏憩室(ZD)是一种咽-食管排异憩室,传统上采用开放手术或内镜(刚性和柔性)技术进行治疗。Zenker的经口内窥镜肌切开术(Z-POEM)最近作为一种微创替代方法出现,显示出良好的疗效和安全性。这篇叙述性综述旨在综合目前关于Z-POEM技术演变的证据,其适应症,程序上的细微差别,长期结果,成本效益和未来方向。方法:根据SANRA指南进行结构化的叙述性回顾,以评估Zenker经口内窥镜肌切开术(Z-POEM)的技术改进、临床结果和并发症。系统检索2016年1月至2025年9月期间发表的相关文献,检索PubMed、Scopus和EMBASE,并辅以人工引文追踪。符合条件的研究包括临床试验、队列、观察性报告和关注Z-POEM或其变体的技术笔记。数据提取和合成由两名审稿人独立完成,研究结果按主题领域组织,包括程序技术、疗效、安全性、不良事件、复发和随访。结果:正确的患者选择是技术成功的关键。憩室大小、症状严重程度和解剖特征等因素指导最佳技术。长期研究报告在30-40个月内持续的临床成功率超过85%。重复Z-POEM手术对治疗复发有很高的疗效。对比数据表明,与柔性内窥镜鼻中隔切开术相比,Z-POEM取得了更好的临床效果,具有相当的安全性和手术时间。结论:Z-POEM具有较高的安全性和有效性,但对于较大的憩室或纤维化憩室,Z-POEM的长期耐受性可能更有利。进一步的研究应侧重于成本效益、技术标准化和长期比较结果,以完善患者选择标准,巩固Z-POEM作为ZD的一线治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinics
Clinics 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
129
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: CLINICS is an electronic journal that publishes peer-reviewed articles in continuous flow, of interest to clinicians and researchers in the medical sciences. CLINICS complies with the policies of funding agencies which request or require deposition of the published articles that they fund into publicly available databases. CLINICS supports the position of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) on trial registration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书