Management of Status Epilepticus in Children before and after Implementation of a Treatment Algorithm.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2026-03-11 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3811
Anne-Sophie Bard, Noémie Savard, Isabelle Laverdière, Karine Cloutier, Geneviève Laflamme, Christian Héroux
{"title":"Management of Status Epilepticus in Children before and after Implementation of a Treatment Algorithm.","authors":"Anne-Sophie Bard, Noémie Savard, Isabelle Laverdière, Karine Cloutier, Geneviève Laflamme, Christian Héroux","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmacological management of status epilepticus (SE) in children must be rapid and optimal to limit morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective was to compare SE management in children before and after the implementation of a drug treatment algorithm. The secondary objective was to describe the compliance of SE management with the algorithm following its implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This evaluative cross-sectional population study with retrospective chart review was performed in a 5-site teaching hospital, which included a tertiary pediatric hospital. Eligible patients were between 1 month and under 18 years of age, had a diagnosis of SE, and received antiseizure medication (ASM) between January 1, 2019, and April 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study involved 108 patients, 60 treated before algorithm implementation and 48 treated after implementation. In both groups, most patients received a benzodiazepine (BZD) as first-line treatment (96% [52/54] and 100% [44/44], respectively). For second-line treatment, the proportion of patients receiving a BZD was greater before than after implementation (36% [10/28] and 26% [6/23], respectively). For first-line treatment, the mean lorazepam dose for patients weighing 40 kg or less was suboptimal (0.08 [standard deviation 0.03] mg/kg in both groups). Median time from hospital arrival to treatment was 7 minutes before and 6 minutes after implementation of the algorithm. For first-line treatment, the choice of ASM and the doses were compliant with the algorithm for 98% (43/44) and 53% (23/43) of patients, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the drug treatment algorithm brought limited changes at the study hospital. More specifically, choice of ASM and time between seizure onset and administration of ASM were similar before and after implementation. Weight-based doses of lorazepam remained suboptimal. Additional training should be given to clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"79 1","pages":"e3811"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmacological management of status epilepticus (SE) in children must be rapid and optimal to limit morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: The primary objective was to compare SE management in children before and after the implementation of a drug treatment algorithm. The secondary objective was to describe the compliance of SE management with the algorithm following its implementation.

Methods: This evaluative cross-sectional population study with retrospective chart review was performed in a 5-site teaching hospital, which included a tertiary pediatric hospital. Eligible patients were between 1 month and under 18 years of age, had a diagnosis of SE, and received antiseizure medication (ASM) between January 1, 2019, and April 1, 2023.

Results: The study involved 108 patients, 60 treated before algorithm implementation and 48 treated after implementation. In both groups, most patients received a benzodiazepine (BZD) as first-line treatment (96% [52/54] and 100% [44/44], respectively). For second-line treatment, the proportion of patients receiving a BZD was greater before than after implementation (36% [10/28] and 26% [6/23], respectively). For first-line treatment, the mean lorazepam dose for patients weighing 40 kg or less was suboptimal (0.08 [standard deviation 0.03] mg/kg in both groups). Median time from hospital arrival to treatment was 7 minutes before and 6 minutes after implementation of the algorithm. For first-line treatment, the choice of ASM and the doses were compliant with the algorithm for 98% (43/44) and 53% (23/43) of patients, respectively.

Conclusions: Implementation of the drug treatment algorithm brought limited changes at the study hospital. More specifically, choice of ASM and time between seizure onset and administration of ASM were similar before and after implementation. Weight-based doses of lorazepam remained suboptimal. Additional training should be given to clinicians.

一种治疗算法实施前后儿童癫痫持续状态的处理。
背景:儿童癫痫持续状态(SE)的药物治疗必须是快速和最佳的,以限制发病率和死亡率。目的:主要目的是比较实施药物治疗算法前后儿童SE管理情况。次要目标是描述SE管理与算法实现后的遵从性。方法:本评估性横断面人群研究采用回顾性图表复习法,在一家5点教学医院进行,其中包括一家三级儿科医院。符合条件的患者年龄在1个月至18岁以下,诊断为SE,并在2019年1月1日至2023年4月1日期间接受抗癫痫药物(ASM)治疗。结果:共纳入108例患者,算法实施前治疗60例,算法实施后治疗48例。在两组中,大多数患者接受苯二氮卓类药物(BZD)作为一线治疗(96%[52/54]和100%[44/44])。对于二线治疗,实施前接受BZD的患者比例大于实施后(分别为36%[10/28]和26%[6/23])。对于一线治疗,体重在40 kg或以下的患者劳拉西泮的平均剂量为次优(两组均为0.08[标准差0.03]mg/kg)。该算法实施前和实施后的中位时间分别为7分钟和6分钟。在一线治疗中,98%(43/44)和53%(23/43)的患者ASM和剂量的选择符合算法。结论:在研究医院实施药物治疗算法带来的变化有限。更具体地说,ASM的选择和癫痫发作与给药之间的时间在实施前后相似。以体重为基础的劳拉西泮剂量仍然不够理想。应给予临床医生额外的培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书