Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical Stress Distribution in Titanium and PEEK Rod Constructs for Isthmic L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis.

Idris Avci, Ahmed Yasin Yavuz, Ahmet Atilla Abdioglu, Kemal Paksoy
{"title":"Finite Element Analysis of Mechanical Stress Distribution in Titanium and PEEK Rod Constructs for Isthmic L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis.","authors":"Idris Avci, Ahmed Yasin Yavuz, Ahmet Atilla Abdioglu, Kemal Paksoy","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.49191-25.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the biomechanical behavior of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods using finite element analysis (FEA) in a Grade I L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis model.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>An anatomically accurate 3D finite element model of the L3?S1 spine was created from CT data of a healthy 30-year-old male. A unilateral pars defect at L5 simulated Grade I spondylolisthesis. Instrumented models with titanium and PEEK rods were subjected to five physiological loading conditions. Von Mises stresses and displacement vectors were analyzed and stress distributions on bone, screws and rods were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Titanium rods absorbed significantly higher loads across all loading conditions (e.g., 117 N vs. 34.5 N in compression; p < 0.01), while PEEK constructs allowed greater load sharing with the bone. Screws in titanium systems experienced higher stresses, particularly in posterior shear and axial rotation. Both materials effectively reduced stress at the pars defect.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Titanium constructs offer high rigidity but concentrate stress on implants, potentially increasing complication risk. PEEK rods demonstrated a more physiological load distribution, reducing implant stress without compromising stability. PEEK rods may serve as a biomechanically advantageous alternative to titanium in select spondylolisthesis cases. Further clinical validation is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"246-253"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.49191-25.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the biomechanical behavior of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) rods using finite element analysis (FEA) in a Grade I L5-S1 isthmic spondylolisthesis model.

Material and methods: An anatomically accurate 3D finite element model of the L3?S1 spine was created from CT data of a healthy 30-year-old male. A unilateral pars defect at L5 simulated Grade I spondylolisthesis. Instrumented models with titanium and PEEK rods were subjected to five physiological loading conditions. Von Mises stresses and displacement vectors were analyzed and stress distributions on bone, screws and rods were measured.

Results: Titanium rods absorbed significantly higher loads across all loading conditions (e.g., 117 N vs. 34.5 N in compression; p < 0.01), while PEEK constructs allowed greater load sharing with the bone. Screws in titanium systems experienced higher stresses, particularly in posterior shear and axial rotation. Both materials effectively reduced stress at the pars defect.

Conclusion: Titanium constructs offer high rigidity but concentrate stress on implants, potentially increasing complication risk. PEEK rods demonstrated a more physiological load distribution, reducing implant stress without compromising stability. PEEK rods may serve as a biomechanically advantageous alternative to titanium in select spondylolisthesis cases. Further clinical validation is warranted.

L5-S1峡部滑脱钛与PEEK棒结构体机械应力分布的有限元分析。
目的:本研究旨在通过有限元分析(FEA)比较I级L5-S1椎体滑脱模型中钛棒和PEEK棒的生物力学行为。材料和方法:根据一名30岁健康男性的CT数据,建立解剖精确的L3-S1脊柱三维有限元模型。L5的单侧部缺损模拟I级脊柱滑脱。使用钛和PEEK棒的仪器模型承受五种生理负荷条件。分析Von Mises应力和位移矢量,测量骨、螺钉和棒的应力分布。结果:钛棒在所有加载条件下都吸收了更高的载荷(例如,117牛对34.5牛的压缩;p < 0.01),而PEEK结构体可以与骨骼更好地分担载荷。螺钉在钛系统中承受较高的应力,特别是在后向剪切和轴向旋转时。两种材料都能有效降低零件缺陷处的应力。结论:钛结构体具有高刚性,但应力集中在种植体上,可能增加并发症的风险。PEEK棒表现出更多的生理负荷分布,在不影响稳定性的情况下减少植入物应力。PEEK棒可以作为生物力学上有利的替代钛在某些脊椎滑脱的情况下。进一步的临床验证是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书