Impact of DNA Methylation Profiling on Central Nervous System Tumor Diagnosis and Management: A Pediatric Cohort Study from Türkiye.

Mehmet Arda Inan, Ayca Ersen Danyeli, Figen Soylemezoglu, Berrin Babaoglu, Bahattin Tanrikulu, Memet Ozek
{"title":"Impact of DNA Methylation Profiling on Central Nervous System Tumor Diagnosis and Management: A Pediatric Cohort Study from Türkiye.","authors":"Mehmet Arda Inan, Ayca Ersen Danyeli, Figen Soylemezoglu, Berrin Babaoglu, Bahattin Tanrikulu, Memet Ozek","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.50069-25.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To present a single-center experience, and to highlight the urgent need for multi-institutional collaboration in Türkiye and surrounding regions lacking access to methylation platforms, with the aim of enhancing diagnostic precision and neuropathological practice.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All pediatric patients who underwent methylation?based tumor classification (MBTC) between November 2023 and July 2025 were retrospectively identified. Clinical, histological, and molecular data were extracted and correlated with methylation results. Concordance between histopathology and MBTC was categorized as concordant, minor discordance, major discordance, novel classification, or un-classifiable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 tumors were profiled (26 females [54%]; 22 males [46%]; median age, 6.5 years; range, 0?17). The most frequent localization was supratentorial (n=18, 36%). Of the entire cohort, concordance was 58%. Excluding unclassifiable cases, concordance among evaluable tumors was 67%. Discordance occurred in 11 cases (23%), including 6 (13%) with major discrepancies. Concordance was significantly associated with tumor localization (p=0.028) but not WHO grade (p=0.17) and classifier confidence (p=0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MBTC is a valuable complementary tool in the diagnostic workup of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, particularly in morphologically ambiguous and ultra-rare cases. It should be integrated with conventional histopathology rather than viewed as a replacement, as it may prevent prognostic misclassification and inappropriate treatment in selected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"281-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.50069-25.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To present a single-center experience, and to highlight the urgent need for multi-institutional collaboration in Türkiye and surrounding regions lacking access to methylation platforms, with the aim of enhancing diagnostic precision and neuropathological practice.

Material and methods: All pediatric patients who underwent methylation?based tumor classification (MBTC) between November 2023 and July 2025 were retrospectively identified. Clinical, histological, and molecular data were extracted and correlated with methylation results. Concordance between histopathology and MBTC was categorized as concordant, minor discordance, major discordance, novel classification, or un-classifiable.

Results: A total of 48 tumors were profiled (26 females [54%]; 22 males [46%]; median age, 6.5 years; range, 0?17). The most frequent localization was supratentorial (n=18, 36%). Of the entire cohort, concordance was 58%. Excluding unclassifiable cases, concordance among evaluable tumors was 67%. Discordance occurred in 11 cases (23%), including 6 (13%) with major discrepancies. Concordance was significantly associated with tumor localization (p=0.028) but not WHO grade (p=0.17) and classifier confidence (p=0.73).

Conclusion: MBTC is a valuable complementary tool in the diagnostic workup of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, particularly in morphologically ambiguous and ultra-rare cases. It should be integrated with conventional histopathology rather than viewed as a replacement, as it may prevent prognostic misclassification and inappropriate treatment in selected patients.

DNA甲基化分析对中枢神经系统肿瘤诊断和治疗的影响:来自 rkiye的一项儿科队列研究。
目的:基于DNA甲基化的肿瘤分类(MBTC)已经成为诊断中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤的一种有价值的辅助手段。阿奇巴登大学常规应用MBTC治疗形态不确定或中心间不一致的儿科病例。这项工作提出了一个单中心的经验,并强调了在缺乏甲基化平台的t rkiye和周边地区进行多机构合作的迫切需要,目的是提高诊断精度和神经病理学实践。材料和方法:回顾性分析2023年11月至2025年7月期间接受MBTC治疗的所有儿科患者。提取临床、组织学和分子数据并与甲基化结果相关联。组织病理学与MBTC的一致性分为一致、轻微不一致、主要不一致、新分类和不可分类。结果:共分析了48例肿瘤,其中女性26例(54%),男性22例(46%),中位年龄6.5岁,范围0-17岁。最常见的定位是幕上(n = 18, 36%)。在整个队列中,一致性为58%。排除无法分类的病例,可评估肿瘤的一致性为67%。发生不一致11例(23%),其中重大不一致6例(13%)。一致性与肿瘤定位(p = 0.028)显著相关,但与WHO分级(p = 0.17)和分类器置信度(p = 0.73)无关。结论:MBTC在小儿中枢神经系统肿瘤的诊断中是一种有价值的辅助工具,特别是在形态学模糊和超罕见的病例中。它应该与传统的组织病理学相结合,而不是作为一种替代,因为它可以防止预后错误分类和不适当的治疗选择的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书