Effects of Caudal Epidural Pethidine on Pain Control and Early Mobilization after Posterior Spinal Instrumentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Necati Kaplan, Ilke Tamdogan, Tamer Tamdogan, Sevim Ondul, Numan Karaarslan, Ibrahim Yilmaz
{"title":"Effects of Caudal Epidural Pethidine on Pain Control and Early Mobilization after Posterior Spinal Instrumentation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Necati Kaplan, Ilke Tamdogan, Tamer Tamdogan, Sevim Ondul, Numan Karaarslan, Ibrahim Yilmaz","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48568-25.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate the effects of administering pethidine (also known as meperidine), a long-acting narcotic analgesic, via the caudal epidural route at the conclusion of posterior lumbar instrumentation (PLI) surgery on postoperative pain control, and early mobilization of patients.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The cases included in this prospective study (n=48) were randomly divided into two groups, ensuring similar gender and age distributions and uniformity regarding lumbar pathologies requiring surgery. In the first group, 20 mL of sodium chloride (0.09%) solution containing pethidine chloride (0.5 mg/kg) was administered via a caudal epidural block before the patients were awakened from anesthesia. The control group consisted of cases in which the caudal epidural block was not performed using pethidine or any other pharmaceutical/pharmacological agent. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain assessments were performed in both groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and 24, 48, and 72 hours after awakening and recovery. Oral feeding at the sixth postoperative hour and mobilization at the eighth postoperative hour were evaluated in all cases. The data obtained were statistically analyzed with a significance level of ?=0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS scores of cases administered with pethidine via a caudal block were found to be significantly lower at all measurement times compared with those without a caudal epidural block (p < 0.05). The need for analgesic medication in terms of dosage and duration was lower in the pethidine group during the postoperative period. Both groups began oral feeding at the sixth postoperative hour. The cases in the pethidine group were mobilized with ease at the eighth postoperative hour, whereas those without a caudal epidural block with pethidine could only be mobilized as early as the 24th postoperative hour.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering pethidine via a caudal epidural block before awakening at the conclusion of PLI surgery may provide benefits in postoperative pain control and early mobilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"254-263"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48568-25.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effects of administering pethidine (also known as meperidine), a long-acting narcotic analgesic, via the caudal epidural route at the conclusion of posterior lumbar instrumentation (PLI) surgery on postoperative pain control, and early mobilization of patients.

Material and methods: The cases included in this prospective study (n=48) were randomly divided into two groups, ensuring similar gender and age distributions and uniformity regarding lumbar pathologies requiring surgery. In the first group, 20 mL of sodium chloride (0.09%) solution containing pethidine chloride (0.5 mg/kg) was administered via a caudal epidural block before the patients were awakened from anesthesia. The control group consisted of cases in which the caudal epidural block was not performed using pethidine or any other pharmaceutical/pharmacological agent. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain assessments were performed in both groups preoperatively, postoperatively, and 24, 48, and 72 hours after awakening and recovery. Oral feeding at the sixth postoperative hour and mobilization at the eighth postoperative hour were evaluated in all cases. The data obtained were statistically analyzed with a significance level of ?=0.05.

Results: The VAS scores of cases administered with pethidine via a caudal block were found to be significantly lower at all measurement times compared with those without a caudal epidural block (p < 0.05). The need for analgesic medication in terms of dosage and duration was lower in the pethidine group during the postoperative period. Both groups began oral feeding at the sixth postoperative hour. The cases in the pethidine group were mobilized with ease at the eighth postoperative hour, whereas those without a caudal epidural block with pethidine could only be mobilized as early as the 24th postoperative hour.

Conclusion: Administering pethidine via a caudal epidural block before awakening at the conclusion of PLI surgery may provide benefits in postoperative pain control and early mobilization.

尾侧硬膜外哌啶对后路脊柱内固定术后疼痛控制和早期活动的影响:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评价后路腰椎内固定术(PLI)结束时经尾侧硬膜外给药哌啶(又称哌啶)对患者术后疼痛控制和早期活动的影响。哌啶是一种长效麻醉镇痛药。材料和方法:纳入本前瞻性研究的病例(n = 48)随机分为两组,以确保性别和年龄分布相似,并确保需要手术的腰椎病变的一致性。第一组患者从麻醉中醒来前,经尾侧硬膜外阻滞给予含哌嗪(0.5 mg/kg)的氯化钠(0.09%)溶液20 ml。对照组包括未使用哌替啶或任何其他药物/药理学药物进行尾侧硬膜外阻滞的病例。两组患者术前、术后以及苏醒和恢复后24、48、72小时分别进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评估。评估所有病例术后第6小时口服喂养和术后第8小时活动情况。对所得资料进行统计学分析,显著性水平为α = 0.05。结果:经尾侧阻滞给予哌啶的患者在所有测量时间的VAS评分均明显低于未经尾侧硬膜外阻滞的患者(p < 0.05)。术后,哌替啶组在剂量和持续时间方面对镇痛药物的需求较低。两组均于术后第6小时开始口服喂养。哌啶组患者术后8小时即可轻松活动,而未行尾侧硬膜外阻滞的患者术后24小时即可活动。结论:在PLI手术结束后醒来前通过尾侧硬膜外阻滞给予哌啶可能有助于术后疼痛控制和早期活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书