Daniel N Munger, Brannan E O Neill, Ali I Rae, Mathew N Geltzeiler, Olabisi R Sanusi
{"title":"Transnasal Transsphenoidal versus Transcranial Surgery for Resection of Sellar Lesions; A National Database Analysis.","authors":"Daniel N Munger, Brannan E O Neill, Ali I Rae, Mathew N Geltzeiler, Olabisi R Sanusi","doi":"10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48023-24.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To present a national database analysis comparing transnasal transsphenoidal (TNTS) and transcranial (TC) approaches in sellar lesion management.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database by TNTS and TC CPT codes from 2014-2018. Outcome measures included periprocedural complications, surgical complications, reoperation within 30 days, readmission, and death. Statistical comparisons were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum test in STATA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 488 procedures were identified (232 TC; 256 TNTS). Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Patients undergoing craniotomy were more likely to have DVT or PE (8 vs 2 patients, p=0.042) and stroke (11 vs 0 patients, p < 0.001). TC approach was associated with longer hospital length-of-stay (6.1 vs 4.2 days, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (15.8% vs 7.1%), and death (2.6% vs 0.4%, p=0.042). Craniotomy was more likely to be performed in nonelective cases (26.3% vs 12.6%, p < 0.001), however the difference in complication rates was driven by elective cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that the TC approach to the sella was associated with higher rates of complications and greater mortality than the TNTS approach. The TC approach was also more likely to be performed in nonelective cases, but the difference in morbidity and mortality was driven by elective cases. Further study is warranted to identify lesion characteristics that may influence choice of approach and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94381,"journal":{"name":"Turkish neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"316-320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.48023-24.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: To present a national database analysis comparing transnasal transsphenoidal (TNTS) and transcranial (TC) approaches in sellar lesion management.
Material and methods: We analyzed the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database by TNTS and TC CPT codes from 2014-2018. Outcome measures included periprocedural complications, surgical complications, reoperation within 30 days, readmission, and death. Statistical comparisons were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum test in STATA.
Results: A total of 488 procedures were identified (232 TC; 256 TNTS). Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. Patients undergoing craniotomy were more likely to have DVT or PE (8 vs 2 patients, p=0.042) and stroke (11 vs 0 patients, p < 0.001). TC approach was associated with longer hospital length-of-stay (6.1 vs 4.2 days, p < 0.001), 30-day readmission (15.8% vs 7.1%), and death (2.6% vs 0.4%, p=0.042). Craniotomy was more likely to be performed in nonelective cases (26.3% vs 12.6%, p < 0.001), however the difference in complication rates was driven by elective cases.
Conclusion: We found that the TC approach to the sella was associated with higher rates of complications and greater mortality than the TNTS approach. The TC approach was also more likely to be performed in nonelective cases, but the difference in morbidity and mortality was driven by elective cases. Further study is warranted to identify lesion characteristics that may influence choice of approach and outcomes.
目的:手术切除是鞍区病变治疗的重要手段。经鼻经蝶(TNTS)和经颅(TC)入路都是可行的选择,尽管它们各自具有相对的优势和局限性。我们提出了一个比较这些技术的国家数据库分析。材料和方法:采用TNTS和TC CPT代码对2014-2018年国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库进行分析。结局指标包括围手术期并发症、手术并发症、30天内再手术、再入院和死亡。统计学比较采用STATA的Wilcoxon秩和检验。结果:共确定488例手术(232例TC, 256例TNTS)。各组之间的基线人口统计数据具有可比性。接受开颅手术的患者更容易发生DVT或PE(8例对2例,p=0.042)和卒中(11例对0例,p= 0.001)。TC方法与较长的住院时间(6.1 vs 4.2天,p= 0.001)、30天再入院(15.8% vs 7.1%)和死亡(2.6% vs 0.4%, p=0.042)相关。非择期病例更有可能开颅(26.3% vs 12.6%, p 0.001),但并发症发生率的差异是择期病例所致。结论:我们发现TC入路比TNTS入路有更高的并发症发生率和死亡率。TC方法也更有可能在非选择性病例中实施,但发病率和死亡率的差异是由选择性病例驱动的。进一步的研究是必要的,以确定病变的特点,可能会影响选择的方法和结果。