Systemic therapy for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a comprehensive review of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.

Journal of liver cancer Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.17998/jlc.2026.03.02
Jung Yong Hong, Dong Hyun Sinn, Sang Yun Ha
{"title":"Systemic therapy for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a comprehensive review of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy.","authors":"Jung Yong Hong, Dong Hyun Sinn, Sang Yun Ha","doi":"10.17998/jlc.2026.03.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver malignancy exhibiting both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation. Since the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) reclassification, growing molecular and clinical evidence has reshaped our understanding of this entity. However, patients with cHCC-CCA have been systematically excluded from landmark clinical trials in both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), leaving clinicians without prospective evidence to guide treatment selection. This review comprehensively evaluates the current evidence on systemic therapy for advanced cHCC-CCA, encompassing cytotoxic chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and molecularly targeted agents. Retrospective data indicate that gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy achieves the most consistent efficacy among conventional regimens, with median overall survival of 10-16 months. ICIs demonstrate objective response rates of 20-33% with durable responses in a subset of patients, supported by the finding that approximately 57% of cHCC-CCA tumors harbor an immune-high phenotype. Nearly 25% of tumors carry potentially actionable genomic alterations, including fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification. The molecular heterogeneity of cHCC-CCA, with tumors classifiable as HCC-like or CCA-like in approximately 75% of cases, provides a rational framework for personalized treatment selection. We propose an emerging molecular classification-based treatment algorithm and identify critical gaps requiring dedicated prospective investigation. For clinical settings where comprehensive genomic profiling is not feasible, we discuss a pragmatic surrogate-based approach using imaging characteristics and serum tumor markers to guide initial treatment selection. We also address post-progression treatment considerations, including phenotype-based regimen switching and the role of re-biopsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of liver cancer","volume":" ","pages":"36-44"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13062625/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of liver cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2026.03.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) is a rare primary liver malignancy exhibiting both hepatocytic and cholangiocytic differentiation. Since the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) reclassification, growing molecular and clinical evidence has reshaped our understanding of this entity. However, patients with cHCC-CCA have been systematically excluded from landmark clinical trials in both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), leaving clinicians without prospective evidence to guide treatment selection. This review comprehensively evaluates the current evidence on systemic therapy for advanced cHCC-CCA, encompassing cytotoxic chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and molecularly targeted agents. Retrospective data indicate that gemcitabine plus platinum-based chemotherapy achieves the most consistent efficacy among conventional regimens, with median overall survival of 10-16 months. ICIs demonstrate objective response rates of 20-33% with durable responses in a subset of patients, supported by the finding that approximately 57% of cHCC-CCA tumors harbor an immune-high phenotype. Nearly 25% of tumors carry potentially actionable genomic alterations, including fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2) fusions, isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) amplification. The molecular heterogeneity of cHCC-CCA, with tumors classifiable as HCC-like or CCA-like in approximately 75% of cases, provides a rational framework for personalized treatment selection. We propose an emerging molecular classification-based treatment algorithm and identify critical gaps requiring dedicated prospective investigation. For clinical settings where comprehensive genomic profiling is not feasible, we discuss a pragmatic surrogate-based approach using imaging characteristics and serum tumor markers to guide initial treatment selection. We also address post-progression treatment considerations, including phenotype-based regimen switching and the role of re-biopsy.

肝细胞胆管合并癌的全身治疗:化疗、免疫治疗和靶向治疗的综合综述。
肝细胞胆管合并癌(cHCC-CCA)是一种罕见的原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤,表现为肝细胞和胆管细胞分化。自2019年世界卫生组织(WHO)重新分类以来,越来越多的分子和临床证据重塑了我们对这一实体的理解。然而,cHCC-CCA患者已被系统地排除在肝细胞癌(HCC)和胆管癌(CCA)的里程碑式临床试验之外,这使得临床医生没有前瞻性证据来指导治疗选择。本综述全面评估了目前晚期cHCC-CCA全身治疗的证据,包括细胞毒性化疗、免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)、酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和分子靶向药物。回顾性数据显示,吉西他滨联合铂基化疗在常规方案中疗效最一致,中位总生存期(OS)为10-16个月。ICIs的客观反应率为20-33%,在一部分患者中具有持久的反应,这一发现得到了57%的cHCC-CCA肿瘤具有免疫高表型的支持。近25%的肿瘤携带潜在可操作的基因组改变,包括成纤维细胞生长因子受体2 (FGFR2)融合、异柠檬酸脱氢酶1 (IDH1)突变和人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)扩增。chcc - cca的分子异质性——在大约75%的病例中肿瘤可分为hcc样或cca样——为个性化治疗选择提供了合理的框架。我们提出了一种新兴的基于分子分类的治疗算法,并确定了需要专门前瞻性调查的关键差距。对于临床环境,全面的基因组分析是不可行的,我们讨论了一个实用的基于替代的方法,使用成像特征和血清肿瘤标志物来指导初始治疗选择。我们还讨论了进展后治疗的考虑,包括基于表型的方案切换和再次活检的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书