Effect of scan body geometric configuration and library design on digital implant impression accuracy.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.55
Hong Seok Moon, Ahreum Choi, Kyung Chul Oh, Minji Sun, Jaeyoung Kim
{"title":"Effect of scan body geometric configuration and library design on digital implant impression accuracy.","authors":"Hong Seok Moon, Ahreum Choi, Kyung Chul Oh, Minji Sun, Jaeyoung Kim","doi":"10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this <i>in vitro</i> study was to evaluate how variations in scan body geometry, specifically body height and the length of the flat indexing surface (FIS), affect linear and angular accuracy when combined with truncated or full-geometry library files.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Nine scan body geometries were fabricated by combining three body heights (4, 5, and 6 mm) with three FIS lengths (1, 2, and 3 mm). Digital impressions were superimposed onto truncated or full-geometry library files. Linear deviation (ΔD) and angular deviation (ΔA) were calculated by comparing aligned scan bodies with coordinate measuring machine references. Linear and angular deviations were compared between library types using the Mann-Whitney U test, and differences among body heights and FIS lengths were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc test (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear deviation remained within a comparable range, and most geometry-library comparisons did not show a significant difference from body height, FIS length, or library morphology (<i>P</i> > .05). Angular deviation demonstrated geometry-dependent behavior, increasing only in the 4-mm body paired with larger FIS lengths, particularly when full-geometry libraries were used. No significant angular differences were observed in the 5-mm or 6-mm body groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital implant registration remained stable across most configurations. Shortened scan bodies performed reliably when FIS dimensions were preserved. Angular accuracy was more sensitive to geometry-library interactions, with truncated libraries improving stability.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":"18 1","pages":"55-66"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956435/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.55","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate how variations in scan body geometry, specifically body height and the length of the flat indexing surface (FIS), affect linear and angular accuracy when combined with truncated or full-geometry library files.

Materials and methods: Nine scan body geometries were fabricated by combining three body heights (4, 5, and 6 mm) with three FIS lengths (1, 2, and 3 mm). Digital impressions were superimposed onto truncated or full-geometry library files. Linear deviation (ΔD) and angular deviation (ΔA) were calculated by comparing aligned scan bodies with coordinate measuring machine references. Linear and angular deviations were compared between library types using the Mann-Whitney U test, and differences among body heights and FIS lengths were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc test (α = .05).

Results: Linear deviation remained within a comparable range, and most geometry-library comparisons did not show a significant difference from body height, FIS length, or library morphology (P > .05). Angular deviation demonstrated geometry-dependent behavior, increasing only in the 4-mm body paired with larger FIS lengths, particularly when full-geometry libraries were used. No significant angular differences were observed in the 5-mm or 6-mm body groups.

Conclusion: Digital implant registration remained stable across most configurations. Shortened scan bodies performed reliably when FIS dimensions were preserved. Angular accuracy was more sensitive to geometry-library interactions, with truncated libraries improving stability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

扫描体几何形态和库设计对数字植入物印模精度的影响。
目的:本体外研究的目的是评估扫描体几何形状的变化,特别是体高和平面标引面(FIS)的长度,在与截断或全几何库文件结合时如何影响线性和角度精度。材料和方法:通过将三种体高(4,5和6mm)与三种FIS长度(1,2和3mm)相结合,制作了九种扫描体几何形状。数字印象叠加到截断或全几何库文件。通过将扫描体与坐标测量机参考进行比较,计算出线性偏差(ΔD)和角偏差(ΔA)。采用Mann-Whitney U检验比较不同文库类型之间的线性和角度偏差,采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn事后检验评估体高和FIS长度的差异(α = 0.05)。结果:线性偏差保持在可比较的范围内,大多数几何文库比较没有显示出身体高度,FIS长度或文库形态的显着差异(P < 0.05)。角偏差表现出几何依赖行为,仅在4毫米的体与较大的FIS长度配对时增加,特别是在使用全几何文库时。在5mm和6mm体组中没有观察到明显的角度差异。结论:在大多数配置中,数字种植体定位保持稳定。在保留FIS尺寸的情况下,缩短的扫描体表现可靠。角精度对几何库相互作用更敏感,截断库提高了稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书