Andrew Tsai, Heeyeon Suh, Sandra Khong Tai, Marta Baird, Heesoo Oh
{"title":"Stability of transverse changes with clear aligners and hyrax expanders from the mixed to the permanent dentition.","authors":"Andrew Tsai, Heeyeon Suh, Sandra Khong Tai, Marta Baird, Heesoo Oh","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2026.01.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated the longitudinal stability of transverse changes in patients treated with the Invisalign First system (IFS; Align Technology Inc, Tempe, Ariz) and hyrax expanders during the mixed dentition, followed through the permanent dentition. The objective was to determine whether expansion achieved during the mixed dentition was maintained through the transition to the permanent dentition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal study included 119 patients: 44 patients treated with IFS, 36 patients treated with hyrax, and 39 untreated controls. Arch width changes at the canines, premolars, and first molars were measured on digital study models at 3 time points: pre-phase 1 treatment (T1), post-phase 1 treatment (T2), and pre-phase 2 evaluation (T3). Vertical skeletal changes were evaluated in a cephalogram subgroup. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance and linear mixed-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both IFS and hyrax groups showed greater maxillary arch width increases from T1 to T3 (IFS: 1.8-2.8 mm; hyrax: 2.2-3.7 mm) than controls (0.4-1.2 mm; P <0.0001). At T2, hyrax showed significantly greater interpremolar and intermolar expansion (4.1-4.8 mm) than IFS (1.9-2.8 mm), but more relapse from T2 to T3. The IFS group also showed increased mandibular arch width from T1 to T3 (1.9-2.9 mm) compared with controls (P <0.05). No significant vertical skeletal changes from T1 to T3 were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both IFS and hyrax produced maxillary arch expansion that was maintained throughout the transition from mixed to permanent dentition. The IFS also showed stable mandibular arch expansion, supporting its use for mild crowding or transverse deficiencies without long-term vertical effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2026.01.017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluated the longitudinal stability of transverse changes in patients treated with the Invisalign First system (IFS; Align Technology Inc, Tempe, Ariz) and hyrax expanders during the mixed dentition, followed through the permanent dentition. The objective was to determine whether expansion achieved during the mixed dentition was maintained through the transition to the permanent dentition.
Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study included 119 patients: 44 patients treated with IFS, 36 patients treated with hyrax, and 39 untreated controls. Arch width changes at the canines, premolars, and first molars were measured on digital study models at 3 time points: pre-phase 1 treatment (T1), post-phase 1 treatment (T2), and pre-phase 2 evaluation (T3). Vertical skeletal changes were evaluated in a cephalogram subgroup. Statistical analyses included analysis of variance and linear mixed-effects models.
Results: Both IFS and hyrax groups showed greater maxillary arch width increases from T1 to T3 (IFS: 1.8-2.8 mm; hyrax: 2.2-3.7 mm) than controls (0.4-1.2 mm; P <0.0001). At T2, hyrax showed significantly greater interpremolar and intermolar expansion (4.1-4.8 mm) than IFS (1.9-2.8 mm), but more relapse from T2 to T3. The IFS group also showed increased mandibular arch width from T1 to T3 (1.9-2.9 mm) compared with controls (P <0.05). No significant vertical skeletal changes from T1 to T3 were observed.
Conclusions: Both IFS and hyrax produced maxillary arch expansion that was maintained throughout the transition from mixed to permanent dentition. The IFS also showed stable mandibular arch expansion, supporting its use for mild crowding or transverse deficiencies without long-term vertical effects.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.