A decolonial perspective on healthcare worker migration - and its implications for education and training.

IF 3.4 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Danica Anne Sims
{"title":"A decolonial perspective on healthcare worker migration - and its implications for education and training.","authors":"Danica Anne Sims","doi":"10.1007/s10459-026-10525-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Worldwide, health-care worker migration follows a dominant and unequal pattern: healthcare workers trained in the resource-constrained global South relocate to wealthier countries in the global North, leaving already fragile healthcare systems with even fewer hands. The World Health Organisation projects a ten-million-worker shortfall by 2030, with 83 low- and middle-income countries already sitting below the workforce density needed for basic healthcare. Traditional explanations may describe this imbalance but offer few structural targets for meaningful change. Decoloniality provides a deeper analytic lens. It argues that European colonialism created a colonial matrix of power that still organises labour, capital, and knowledge. Three intertwined colonialities keep that matrix alive today: power (who controls resources), knowledge (whose expertise is legitimised), and being (whose personhood is valued). Viewed through this framework, the persistent outflow of Southern healthcare workers is not an unfortunate accident of globalisation; it is a contemporary iteration of colonial extraction. Northern countries under-invest in domestic education, then recruit talent from regions they historically dominated, validating only Western credentials and relegating international healthcare workers to inferior status even as they become essential to service delivery. This scholarly reflection does more than rename the problem – it illuminates new points of intervention. Tackling coloniality of power suggests reparative resource redistribution, whether financial or epistemic, with investment in domestic training capacity; addressing coloniality of knowledge through the recognition of Southern training and bi-directional knowledge exchange; and disrupting coloniality of being through workplace reforms that grant international healthcare workers full professional agency. By foregrounding structure over individual choice, decoloniality equips educators, policymakers, and researchers with a systemic perspective for building a fair, sustainable global health workforce.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-026-10525-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, health-care worker migration follows a dominant and unequal pattern: healthcare workers trained in the resource-constrained global South relocate to wealthier countries in the global North, leaving already fragile healthcare systems with even fewer hands. The World Health Organisation projects a ten-million-worker shortfall by 2030, with 83 low- and middle-income countries already sitting below the workforce density needed for basic healthcare. Traditional explanations may describe this imbalance but offer few structural targets for meaningful change. Decoloniality provides a deeper analytic lens. It argues that European colonialism created a colonial matrix of power that still organises labour, capital, and knowledge. Three intertwined colonialities keep that matrix alive today: power (who controls resources), knowledge (whose expertise is legitimised), and being (whose personhood is valued). Viewed through this framework, the persistent outflow of Southern healthcare workers is not an unfortunate accident of globalisation; it is a contemporary iteration of colonial extraction. Northern countries under-invest in domestic education, then recruit talent from regions they historically dominated, validating only Western credentials and relegating international healthcare workers to inferior status even as they become essential to service delivery. This scholarly reflection does more than rename the problem – it illuminates new points of intervention. Tackling coloniality of power suggests reparative resource redistribution, whether financial or epistemic, with investment in domestic training capacity; addressing coloniality of knowledge through the recognition of Southern training and bi-directional knowledge exchange; and disrupting coloniality of being through workplace reforms that grant international healthcare workers full professional agency. By foregrounding structure over individual choice, decoloniality equips educators, policymakers, and researchers with a systemic perspective for building a fair, sustainable global health workforce.

从非殖民角度看保健工作者移徙及其对教育和培训的影响。
在世界范围内,卫生保健工作者移徙遵循一种占主导地位和不平等的模式:在资源有限的全球南方接受培训的卫生保健工作者迁移到全球北方较富裕的国家,使本已脆弱的卫生保健系统人手更少。世界卫生组织预计,到2030年,劳动力缺口将达到1000万,83个低收入和中等收入国家的劳动力密度已经低于基本医疗所需的水平。传统的解释可能描述了这种不平衡,但却没有为有意义的变革提供多少结构性目标。非殖民化提供了一个更深入的分析视角。它认为,欧洲殖民主义创造了一个殖民主义的权力矩阵,它仍然组织着劳动力、资本和知识。三种相互交织的殖民主义使这个矩阵在今天依然存在:权力(谁控制资源)、知识(谁的专长被合法化)和存在(谁的人格受到重视)。从这个框架来看,南方医疗工作者的持续外流并不是全球化的不幸意外;这是殖民榨取的当代版本。北方国家对国内教育投资不足,然后从历史上占主导地位的地区招募人才,只认可西方的证书,并将国际医疗工作者置于次等地位,即使他们对提供服务至关重要。这种学术性的反思不仅仅是重新命名了这个问题——它阐明了新的干预点。要解决权力殖民问题,需要进行补救性的资源再分配,无论是财政上的还是知识上的,同时投资于国内培训能力;通过承认南方培训和双向知识交流,解决知识的殖民问题;通过工作场所改革打破殖民主义,给予国际医疗工作者充分的专业代理权。通过将结构置于个人选择之上,去殖民化使教育工作者、政策制定者和研究人员具备了建立公平、可持续的全球卫生人力的系统视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书