Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Flow Diversion for Carotid-Ophthalmic Aneurysms: a Single-Centre Experience.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s00062-026-01625-9
Gian Marco Frigerio, Sara Sciacca, Jeremy Lynch, Sahan Guruge, Matthew Benger, Parthiban Balasundaram, Thomas Booth, Naga Kandasamy
{"title":"Mid- and Long-Term Outcomes Following Flow Diversion for Carotid-Ophthalmic Aneurysms: a Single-Centre Experience.","authors":"Gian Marco Frigerio, Sara Sciacca, Jeremy Lynch, Sahan Guruge, Matthew Benger, Parthiban Balasundaram, Thomas Booth, Naga Kandasamy","doi":"10.1007/s00062-026-01625-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Flow diverter stents (FDS) have shown promise in treating carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms (COAs), but mid- to long-term data remain limited. This study reports our institutional experience using FDS for unruptured COAs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between August 2010 and September 2023, 105 unruptured COAs in 99 patients (87 females, mean age 54 ± 14 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The anatomical relationship between the ophthalmic artery (OphA) and the aneurysm was classified as Type 1 (separate), Type 2 (neck), or Type 3 (dome). Patients were treated with FDS alone or with adjunctive coiling. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, including visual complications, were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success was 98.1%. At a mean follow-up of 38.5 months, complete occlusion was achieved in 89.1% and adequate occlusion in 98.0%. Occlusion rates were comparable across types, with a trend toward lower rates in Type 2. Retreatment was required in 1.0%. Major adverse events occurred in 1.0%, neurological complications in 3.0%, and in-stent stenosis in 2.0%. New visual deficits occurred in 6.1% (4.0% transient, 2.0% permanent). Aneurysm size > 12 mm was significantly associated with persistent symptoms (p = 0.003). Preoperative visual symptoms were the only independent predictor of poor visual outcome. Outcomes were comparable between FDS-only and FDS+coiling groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FDS, with or without coiling, is a safe and effective treatment for COAs, achieving durable occlusion and generally favorable visual outcomes. The OphA-aneurysm relationship may influence occlusion, although residual filling may also reflect physiological flow preservation. Early treatment is essential in patients with large aneurysms and visual symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49298,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"743-755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-026-01625-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Flow diverter stents (FDS) have shown promise in treating carotid-ophthalmic aneurysms (COAs), but mid- to long-term data remain limited. This study reports our institutional experience using FDS for unruptured COAs.

Methods: Between August 2010 and September 2023, 105 unruptured COAs in 99 patients (87 females, mean age 54 ± 14 years) were retrospectively analyzed. The anatomical relationship between the ophthalmic artery (OphA) and the aneurysm was classified as Type 1 (separate), Type 2 (neck), or Type 3 (dome). Patients were treated with FDS alone or with adjunctive coiling. Clinical and angiographic outcomes, including visual complications, were assessed.

Results: Technical success was 98.1%. At a mean follow-up of 38.5 months, complete occlusion was achieved in 89.1% and adequate occlusion in 98.0%. Occlusion rates were comparable across types, with a trend toward lower rates in Type 2. Retreatment was required in 1.0%. Major adverse events occurred in 1.0%, neurological complications in 3.0%, and in-stent stenosis in 2.0%. New visual deficits occurred in 6.1% (4.0% transient, 2.0% permanent). Aneurysm size > 12 mm was significantly associated with persistent symptoms (p = 0.003). Preoperative visual symptoms were the only independent predictor of poor visual outcome. Outcomes were comparable between FDS-only and FDS+coiling groups.

Conclusion: FDS, with or without coiling, is a safe and effective treatment for COAs, achieving durable occlusion and generally favorable visual outcomes. The OphA-aneurysm relationship may influence occlusion, although residual filling may also reflect physiological flow preservation. Early treatment is essential in patients with large aneurysms and visual symptoms.

分流治疗眼颈动脉瘤的中期和长期疗效:单中心经验。
背景和目的:血流分流支架(FDS)已显示出治疗眼颈动脉瘤(COAs)的前景,但中长期数据仍然有限。本研究报告了我们使用FDS治疗未破裂coa的机构经验。方法:回顾性分析2010年8月至2023年9月99例患者105例未破裂coa(女性87例,平均年龄54 ±14岁)。眼动脉(OphA)与动脉瘤的解剖关系分为1型(单独)、2型(颈部)和3型(穹窿)。患者单独使用FDS或辅助卷绕治疗。评估临床和血管造影结果,包括视觉并发症。结果:技术成功率为98.1%。平均随访38.5个月,89.1%达到完全咬合,98.0%达到充分咬合。不同类型的闭塞率具有可比性,2型的闭塞率有降低的趋势。1.0%需要再处理。主要不良事件占1.0%,神经系统并发症占3.0%,支架内狭窄占2.0%。新的视力缺陷发生率为6.1%(4.0%为暂时性,2.0%为永久性)。动脉瘤大小> 12 mm与持续症状显著相关(p = 0.003)。术前视力症状是视力不佳的唯一独立预测因子。仅FDS组和FDS+卷曲组的结果具有可比性。结论:FDS治疗coa安全有效,可实现持久的闭塞和良好的视觉效果。虽然残留填充也可能反映了生理血流的保存,但oha -动脉瘤的关系可能影响闭塞。对于有大动脉瘤和视觉症状的患者,早期治疗至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.60%
发文量
106
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书