Mechanistic Insights into Human Defensin Antimicrobial Activity from Membrane Simulations.

IF 2.6 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Anna K Manukyan
{"title":"Mechanistic Insights into Human Defensin Antimicrobial Activity from Membrane Simulations.","authors":"Anna K Manukyan","doi":"10.1007/s00232-026-00372-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Defensins function as critical effectors of innate immunity, displaying broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, fungi, and viruses. While experimental studies have extensively characterized these peptides, the molecular mechanisms governing their membrane interactions remain poorly understood. This investigation employed comprehensive molecular dynamics simulations to analyze six defensins (human and rabbit α-defensins HNP1, HNP3, rabbit NP4 and human β-defensins HBD1, HBD2, HBD3) using the IMM1 implicit membrane model for studying interactions with anionic bacterial membranes. Both monomeric and dimeric forms were examined to elucidate oligomerization effects on membrane binding and penetration mechanisms. Transfer energy calculations revealed distinct binding patterns and orientations among different defensin subtypes, with β-defensins demonstrating superior membrane affinity compared to α-defensins. HBD3 exhibited the most favorable membrane interactions, correlating with its exceptional antimicrobial potency. Binding orientation analysis demonstrated that defensins adopt specific membrane-bound configurations that optimize electrostatic interactions with anionic membrane surfaces while strategically positioning hydrophobic regions for effective membrane insertion. These findings provide molecular level insights into defensin selectivity mechanisms for bacterial membranes and establish a foundation for defensin-based therapeutic development. The results validate that computational approaches effectively complement experimental studies in elucidating complex antimicrobial peptide mechanisms. This modeling framework supports rational design of next generation defensin therapeutics with optimized antimicrobial activity and pathogen selectivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Membrane Biology","volume":"259 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Membrane Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00232-026-00372-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Defensins function as critical effectors of innate immunity, displaying broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against bacteria, fungi, and viruses. While experimental studies have extensively characterized these peptides, the molecular mechanisms governing their membrane interactions remain poorly understood. This investigation employed comprehensive molecular dynamics simulations to analyze six defensins (human and rabbit α-defensins HNP1, HNP3, rabbit NP4 and human β-defensins HBD1, HBD2, HBD3) using the IMM1 implicit membrane model for studying interactions with anionic bacterial membranes. Both monomeric and dimeric forms were examined to elucidate oligomerization effects on membrane binding and penetration mechanisms. Transfer energy calculations revealed distinct binding patterns and orientations among different defensin subtypes, with β-defensins demonstrating superior membrane affinity compared to α-defensins. HBD3 exhibited the most favorable membrane interactions, correlating with its exceptional antimicrobial potency. Binding orientation analysis demonstrated that defensins adopt specific membrane-bound configurations that optimize electrostatic interactions with anionic membrane surfaces while strategically positioning hydrophobic regions for effective membrane insertion. These findings provide molecular level insights into defensin selectivity mechanisms for bacterial membranes and establish a foundation for defensin-based therapeutic development. The results validate that computational approaches effectively complement experimental studies in elucidating complex antimicrobial peptide mechanisms. This modeling framework supports rational design of next generation defensin therapeutics with optimized antimicrobial activity and pathogen selectivity.

从膜模拟研究人类防御素抗菌活性的机理。
防御素作为先天免疫的关键效应器,对细菌、真菌和病毒表现出广谱的抗菌活性。虽然实验研究广泛表征了这些肽,但控制其膜相互作用的分子机制仍然知之甚少。本研究采用综合分子动力学模拟方法,利用IMM1隐式膜模型分析6种防御素(人和兔α-防御素HNP1、HNP3、兔NP4和人β-防御素HBD1、HBD2、HBD3)与阴离子细菌膜的相互作用。研究了单体和二聚体形式,以阐明寡聚化对膜结合和渗透机制的影响。传递能量计算显示,不同防御素亚型之间的结合模式和方向不同,β-防御素表现出优于α-防御素的膜亲和性。HBD3表现出最有利的膜相互作用,与其特殊的抗菌效力相关。结合取向分析表明,防御素采用特定的膜结合结构,优化与阴离子膜表面的静电相互作用,同时策略性地定位疏水区域以有效地插入膜。这些发现为研究细菌膜的防御素选择性机制提供了分子水平的见解,并为基于防御素的治疗开发奠定了基础。结果验证了计算方法在阐明复杂抗菌肽机制方面有效地补充了实验研究。该模型框架支持合理设计具有优化抗菌活性和病原体选择性的下一代防御素疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Membrane Biology
Journal of Membrane Biology 生物-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Membrane Biology is dedicated to publishing high-quality science related to membrane biology, biochemistry and biophysics. In particular, we welcome work that uses modern experimental or computational methods including but not limited to those with microscopy, diffraction, NMR, computer simulations, or biochemistry aimed at membrane associated or membrane embedded proteins or model membrane systems. These methods might be applied to study topics like membrane protein structure and function, membrane mediated or controlled signaling mechanisms, cell-cell communication via gap junctions, the behavior of proteins and lipids based on monolayer or bilayer systems, or genetic and regulatory mechanisms controlling membrane function. Research articles, short communications and reviews are all welcome. We also encourage authors to consider publishing ''negative'' results where experiments or simulations were well performed, but resulted in unusual or unexpected outcomes without obvious explanations. While we welcome connections to clinical studies, submissions that are primarily clinical in nature or that fail to make connections to the basic science issues of membrane structure, chemistry and function, are not appropriate for the journal. In a similar way, studies that are primarily descriptive and narratives of assays in a clinical or population study are best published in other journals. If you are not certain, it is entirely appropriate to write to us to inquire if your study is a good fit for the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书