Wear of 3D-printed resin denture teeth under self-antagonist conditions after chewing simulation.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-13 DOI:10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.25
Sitham Rungsitsathien, Chaimongkon Peampring
{"title":"Wear of 3D-printed resin denture teeth under self-antagonist conditions after chewing simulation.","authors":"Sitham Rungsitsathien, Chaimongkon Peampring","doi":"10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the wear depth and volume loss of 3D-printed resin denture teeth with prefabricated and milled acrylic denture teeth under chewing simulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four groups of denture teeth (n = 9) were evaluated: prefabricated acrylic teeth (PT), milled acrylic teeth (MT), 3D-printed methacrylate-based resin teeth (3DT), and glazed 3D-printed resin teeth (3DT+G). Samples were embedded in self-curing resin, and antagonists were fabricated from the same materials. A chewing simulator was utilized to apply a cyclic occlusal load of 49.05 N (5 kg) for 120,000 cycles in distilled water. Wear depth (µm) and volume loss (mm<sup>3</sup>) were measured using a 3D laser profilometer. Surface morphology was qualitatively analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data normality was verified, and statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in wear depth and volume loss were observed among the groups (<i>P</i> < .05). No significant differences were found between PT and MT, or between 3DT and 3DT+G. However, the 3DT and 3DT+G groups exhibited significantly lower wear depth and volume loss compared to the PT and MT groups (<i>P</i> < .05). SEM analysis revealed that the PT group displayed a more uniform and homogenous surface morphology compared to the other groups, while 3DT+G showed evidence of glaze depletion within the wear facets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D-printed resin denture teeth demonstrated superior wear resistance compared to prefabricated and milled alternatives under simulated chewing conditions. Furthermore, the application of a 50 µm surface glaze did not significantly enhance wear resistance of the 3D-printed resin.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":"18 1","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.25","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the wear depth and volume loss of 3D-printed resin denture teeth with prefabricated and milled acrylic denture teeth under chewing simulation.

Materials and methods: Four groups of denture teeth (n = 9) were evaluated: prefabricated acrylic teeth (PT), milled acrylic teeth (MT), 3D-printed methacrylate-based resin teeth (3DT), and glazed 3D-printed resin teeth (3DT+G). Samples were embedded in self-curing resin, and antagonists were fabricated from the same materials. A chewing simulator was utilized to apply a cyclic occlusal load of 49.05 N (5 kg) for 120,000 cycles in distilled water. Wear depth (µm) and volume loss (mm3) were measured using a 3D laser profilometer. Surface morphology was qualitatively analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data normality was verified, and statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test (α=0.05).

Results: Significant differences in wear depth and volume loss were observed among the groups (P < .05). No significant differences were found between PT and MT, or between 3DT and 3DT+G. However, the 3DT and 3DT+G groups exhibited significantly lower wear depth and volume loss compared to the PT and MT groups (P < .05). SEM analysis revealed that the PT group displayed a more uniform and homogenous surface morphology compared to the other groups, while 3DT+G showed evidence of glaze depletion within the wear facets.

Conclusion: 3D-printed resin denture teeth demonstrated superior wear resistance compared to prefabricated and milled alternatives under simulated chewing conditions. Furthermore, the application of a 50 µm surface glaze did not significantly enhance wear resistance of the 3D-printed resin.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

模拟咀嚼后自拮抗条件下3d打印树脂义齿的磨损。
目的:比较3d打印树脂义齿与预制和研磨丙烯酸义齿在模拟咀嚼作用下的磨损深度和体积损失。材料与方法:对4组(n = 9)义齿进行评价:预制丙烯酸酯假牙(PT)、磨铣丙烯酸酯假牙(MT)、3d打印甲基丙烯酸酯基树脂假牙(3DT)和3d打印树脂假牙(3DT+G)。将样品包埋在自固化树脂中,并用相同的材料制备拮抗剂。利用咀嚼模拟器在蒸馏水中施加49.05 N (5 kg)的循环咬合负荷12万次。使用3D激光轮廓仪测量磨损深度(µm)和体积损失(mm3)。通过扫描电镜(SEM)对其表面形貌进行定性分析。检验数据正态性,采用单因素方差分析和Tukey’s HSD检验(α=0.05)确定统计学显著性。结果:组间磨损深度、体积损失差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。PT与MT、3DT与3DT+G之间无显著差异。与PT和MT组相比,3DT组和3DT+G组的磨损深度和体积损失显著降低(P < 0.05)。扫描电镜分析显示,与其他组相比,PT组表现出更均匀和均匀的表面形貌,而3DT+G组在磨损面显示出釉面损耗的证据。结论:在模拟咀嚼条件下,3d打印树脂义齿比预制和研磨的替代品具有更好的耐磨性。此外,使用50µm的表面釉料并没有显著提高3d打印树脂的耐磨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics. This journal publishes • Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants. • Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics. • Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书