{"title":"Wear of 3D-printed resin denture teeth under self-antagonist conditions after chewing simulation.","authors":"Sitham Rungsitsathien, Chaimongkon Peampring","doi":"10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the wear depth and volume loss of 3D-printed resin denture teeth with prefabricated and milled acrylic denture teeth under chewing simulation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Four groups of denture teeth (n = 9) were evaluated: prefabricated acrylic teeth (PT), milled acrylic teeth (MT), 3D-printed methacrylate-based resin teeth (3DT), and glazed 3D-printed resin teeth (3DT+G). Samples were embedded in self-curing resin, and antagonists were fabricated from the same materials. A chewing simulator was utilized to apply a cyclic occlusal load of 49.05 N (5 kg) for 120,000 cycles in distilled water. Wear depth (µm) and volume loss (mm<sup>3</sup>) were measured using a 3D laser profilometer. Surface morphology was qualitatively analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data normality was verified, and statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test (α=0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences in wear depth and volume loss were observed among the groups (<i>P</i> < .05). No significant differences were found between PT and MT, or between 3DT and 3DT+G. However, the 3DT and 3DT+G groups exhibited significantly lower wear depth and volume loss compared to the PT and MT groups (<i>P</i> < .05). SEM analysis revealed that the PT group displayed a more uniform and homogenous surface morphology compared to the other groups, while 3DT+G showed evidence of glaze depletion within the wear facets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D-printed resin denture teeth demonstrated superior wear resistance compared to prefabricated and milled alternatives under simulated chewing conditions. Furthermore, the application of a 50 µm surface glaze did not significantly enhance wear resistance of the 3D-printed resin.</p>","PeriodicalId":51291,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","volume":"18 1","pages":"25-35"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2026.18.1.25","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the wear depth and volume loss of 3D-printed resin denture teeth with prefabricated and milled acrylic denture teeth under chewing simulation.
Materials and methods: Four groups of denture teeth (n = 9) were evaluated: prefabricated acrylic teeth (PT), milled acrylic teeth (MT), 3D-printed methacrylate-based resin teeth (3DT), and glazed 3D-printed resin teeth (3DT+G). Samples were embedded in self-curing resin, and antagonists were fabricated from the same materials. A chewing simulator was utilized to apply a cyclic occlusal load of 49.05 N (5 kg) for 120,000 cycles in distilled water. Wear depth (µm) and volume loss (mm3) were measured using a 3D laser profilometer. Surface morphology was qualitatively analyzed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data normality was verified, and statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's HSD test (α=0.05).
Results: Significant differences in wear depth and volume loss were observed among the groups (P < .05). No significant differences were found between PT and MT, or between 3DT and 3DT+G. However, the 3DT and 3DT+G groups exhibited significantly lower wear depth and volume loss compared to the PT and MT groups (P < .05). SEM analysis revealed that the PT group displayed a more uniform and homogenous surface morphology compared to the other groups, while 3DT+G showed evidence of glaze depletion within the wear facets.
Conclusion: 3D-printed resin denture teeth demonstrated superior wear resistance compared to prefabricated and milled alternatives under simulated chewing conditions. Furthermore, the application of a 50 µm surface glaze did not significantly enhance wear resistance of the 3D-printed resin.
期刊介绍:
This journal aims to convey scientific and clinical progress in the field of prosthodontics and its related areas to many dental communities concerned with esthetic and functional restorations, occlusion, implants, prostheses, and biomaterials related to prosthodontics.
This journal publishes
• Original research data of high scientific merit in the field of diagnosis, function, esthetics and stomatognathic physiology related to prosthodontic rehabilitation, physiology and mechanics of occlusion, mechanical and biologic aspects of prosthodontic materials including dental implants.
• Review articles by experts on controversies and new developments in prosthodontics.
• Case reports if they provide or document new fundamental knowledge.