Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the 7C Vaccination Readiness Scale: Evidence from Slovenia.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Mitja Vrdelja, Stefani Branilović, Monika Lamot, Andrej Kirbiš
{"title":"Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the 7C Vaccination Readiness Scale: Evidence from Slovenia.","authors":"Mitja Vrdelja, Stefani Branilović, Monika Lamot, Andrej Kirbiš","doi":"10.2478/sjph-2026-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy remains a major global public health challenge. Psychological models, such as the 7C vaccination readiness scale, aim to identify key psychological determinants of vaccine uptake. While the scale has shown validity in various cultural contexts, its psychometric properties have not yet been evaluated in Slovenia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed the psychometric properties, convergent validity, and criterion validity of the Slovenian version of the 7C scale using a representative sample of 1,350 adults via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), correlation coefficients, and regression analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The bifactor model showed mixed psychometric properties. CFA revealed a weak model fit, with two items showing inadmissible estimates; these were removed. The revised model showed improved estimation and acceptable, though still suboptimal, fit indices. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between the general vaccination readiness factor and conspiracy beliefs, while individual components showed weaker associations. Criterion validity analyses showed that the general factor was the strongest predictor of vaccination intention, with calculation and compliance also contributing. The 7C model explained more variance in vaccination intention than the 5C model, suggesting greater utility. Despite structural limitations, the scale demonstrates practical value and offers recommendations for refinement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Slovenian version of the 7C scale proved to be a valuable tool for predicting vaccination intention. The general factor was a robust predictor, and calculation and compliance showed additional validity. However, components like complacency and constraints need revision to improve model fit. With refinement, the 7C scale holds promise for research and public health applications across contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":45127,"journal":{"name":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","volume":"65 1","pages":"25-33"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12955843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zdravstveno Varstvo","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2026-0004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy remains a major global public health challenge. Psychological models, such as the 7C vaccination readiness scale, aim to identify key psychological determinants of vaccine uptake. While the scale has shown validity in various cultural contexts, its psychometric properties have not yet been evaluated in Slovenia.

Methods: This study assessed the psychometric properties, convergent validity, and criterion validity of the Slovenian version of the 7C scale using a representative sample of 1,350 adults via confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), correlation coefficients, and regression analyses.

Results: The bifactor model showed mixed psychometric properties. CFA revealed a weak model fit, with two items showing inadmissible estimates; these were removed. The revised model showed improved estimation and acceptable, though still suboptimal, fit indices. Convergent validity was supported by significant correlations between the general vaccination readiness factor and conspiracy beliefs, while individual components showed weaker associations. Criterion validity analyses showed that the general factor was the strongest predictor of vaccination intention, with calculation and compliance also contributing. The 7C model explained more variance in vaccination intention than the 5C model, suggesting greater utility. Despite structural limitations, the scale demonstrates practical value and offers recommendations for refinement.

Conclusions: The Slovenian version of the 7C scale proved to be a valuable tool for predicting vaccination intention. The general factor was a robust predictor, and calculation and compliance showed additional validity. However, components like complacency and constraints need revision to improve model fit. With refinement, the 7C scale holds promise for research and public health applications across contexts.

评估7C疫苗接种准备量表的心理测量特性:来自斯洛文尼亚的证据。
疫苗犹豫仍然是一个重大的全球公共卫生挑战。心理模型,如7C疫苗接种准备程度量表,旨在确定疫苗接种的关键心理决定因素。虽然该量表在各种文化背景下显示出有效性,但其心理测量特性尚未在斯洛文尼亚进行评估。方法:本研究通过验证性因子分析(CFA)、相关系数和回归分析,对斯洛文尼亚版7C量表的心理测量特性、收敛效度和标准效度进行了评估。结果:双因素模型具有混合的心理测量性质。CFA显示弱模型拟合,有两个项目显示不可接受的估计;这些都被移除了。修正后的模型显示了改进的估计和可接受的拟合指数,尽管仍然是次优的。一般疫苗接种准备因素与阴谋信念之间的显著相关性支持了收敛效度,而个别成分的相关性较弱。标准效度分析显示,一般因素是疫苗接种意向的最强预测因子,计算和依从性也有贡献。7C模型比5C模型解释了更多的疫苗接种意愿差异,表明更大的效用。尽管存在结构上的限制,但该量表显示了实用价值,并提供了改进建议。结论:斯洛文尼亚版的7C量表被证明是预测疫苗接种意图的有价值的工具。一般因素是一个稳健的预测因子,计算和依从性显示额外的有效性。然而,自满和约束之类的组件需要修改以改进模型拟合。经过改进,7C量表有望在各种情况下用于研究和公共卫生应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Zdravstveno Varstvo
Zdravstveno Varstvo PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
23 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书