Conducting Behavioural Experiments Using an App-Based Self-Help Program for Social Anxiety Disorder (SMASH): Outcomes of a Quasi-Experimental Pre-Post Pilot Trial.

IF 2.4 Q2 Psychology
Clinical Psychology in Europe Pub Date : 2026-02-27 eCollection Date: 2026-02-01 DOI:10.32872/cpe.15687
Johanna S Schüller, Jacob Kujat, Jan M Schittenhelm, Ronja von Rechenberg, Antonia Čerič, Jürgen Hoyer, Ulrich Stangier
{"title":"Conducting Behavioural Experiments Using an App-Based Self-Help Program for Social Anxiety Disorder (SMASH): Outcomes of a Quasi-Experimental Pre-Post Pilot Trial.","authors":"Johanna S Schüller, Jacob Kujat, Jan M Schittenhelm, Ronja von Rechenberg, Antonia Čerič, Jürgen Hoyer, Ulrich Stangier","doi":"10.32872/cpe.15687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is a prevalent mental disorder characterised by fear of negative evaluation. Although effective treatment approaches are available, access remains limited due to psychological and organisational barriers. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) has shown promising results and may facilitate an easy and more resource-efficient access to treatment.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We developed an app-based self-help intervention for SAD based on the Clark and Wells treatment program, implemented as an unguided smartphone application, which was evaluated in this quasi-experimental pre-post pilot study consisting of <i>N</i> = 33 patients with a primary diagnosis of SAD. Feasibility was assessed through usage parameters and qualitative feedback. Effectiveness was evaluated in regard to SAD and depression, using clinician-rated measures (LSAS, QIDS-C) at post-treatment (12 weeks) and self-report measures (SPIN, SCQ, BDI-FS) at midpoint and post-treatment. Additionally, moderating effects of usage parameters on symptom reduction were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinician- and self-reported SAD symptoms were significantly reduced at post-measurement (within-group effect sizes LSAS: η<sup>2</sup> = .54; SPIN: η<sup>2</sup> = .47), with 52% of patients achieving a clinically significant improvement. Despite moderate overall adherence, the amount of conducted behavioural experiments moderated reduction in self-reported SAD symptom severity and SAD-related cognitions. Open feedback supported feasibility and acceptability of the app.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, findings provide preliminary support for feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of <i>Mindable: Soziale Phobie</i>. A randomised controlled trial will further evaluate the effectiveness and explore the impact of therapist guidance.</p>","PeriodicalId":34029,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","volume":"8 1","pages":"e15687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12955303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Psychology in Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.15687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) is a prevalent mental disorder characterised by fear of negative evaluation. Although effective treatment approaches are available, access remains limited due to psychological and organisational barriers. Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) has shown promising results and may facilitate an easy and more resource-efficient access to treatment.

Method: We developed an app-based self-help intervention for SAD based on the Clark and Wells treatment program, implemented as an unguided smartphone application, which was evaluated in this quasi-experimental pre-post pilot study consisting of N = 33 patients with a primary diagnosis of SAD. Feasibility was assessed through usage parameters and qualitative feedback. Effectiveness was evaluated in regard to SAD and depression, using clinician-rated measures (LSAS, QIDS-C) at post-treatment (12 weeks) and self-report measures (SPIN, SCQ, BDI-FS) at midpoint and post-treatment. Additionally, moderating effects of usage parameters on symptom reduction were examined.

Results: Clinician- and self-reported SAD symptoms were significantly reduced at post-measurement (within-group effect sizes LSAS: η2 = .54; SPIN: η2 = .47), with 52% of patients achieving a clinically significant improvement. Despite moderate overall adherence, the amount of conducted behavioural experiments moderated reduction in self-reported SAD symptom severity and SAD-related cognitions. Open feedback supported feasibility and acceptability of the app.

Conclusion: In conclusion, findings provide preliminary support for feasibility, acceptability, and potential effectiveness of Mindable: Soziale Phobie. A randomised controlled trial will further evaluate the effectiveness and explore the impact of therapist guidance.

使用基于app的社交焦虑障碍自助程序(SMASH)进行行为实验:准实验前-后试点试验的结果
背景:社交焦虑障碍(Social Anxiety Disorder, SAD)是一种普遍存在的以害怕负面评价为特征的精神障碍。虽然有有效的治疗方法,但由于心理和组织障碍,获取途径仍然有限。基于互联网的认知行为疗法(iCBT)已经显示出有希望的结果,并可能促进更容易和更有效地获得治疗。方法:我们在Clark和Wells治疗方案的基础上开发了一种基于应用程序的SAD自助干预,作为一种无引导的智能手机应用程序实施,并在这项准实验前-后试点研究中进行了评估,该研究由N = 33名初步诊断为SAD的患者组成。通过使用参数和定性反馈评估可行性。在治疗后(12周)采用临床评定量表(LSAS、QIDS-C),在治疗中点和治疗后采用自我报告量表(SPIN、SCQ、BDI-FS),评估SAD和抑郁的有效性。此外,研究了使用参数对症状减轻的调节作用。结果:临床医生和自我报告的SAD症状在测量后显着减少(组内效应量LSAS: η2 = 0.54; SPIN: η2 = 0.47), 52%的患者实现了临床显着改善。尽管总体依从性中等,但进行行为实验的数量减缓了自我报告的SAD症状严重程度和SAD相关认知的减少。公开反馈支持应用程序的可行性和可接受性。结论:研究结果为Mindable: Soziale Phobie的可行性、可接受性和潜在有效性提供了初步支持。一项随机对照试验将进一步评估有效性并探讨治疗师指导的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Clinical Psychology in Europe Psychology-Clinical Psychology
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书