Pharmacologic Therapies for Active Moderate-to-Severe TED: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

IF 2.5 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Carlos E Builes-Montaño, Alejandro Román-González, Henry M Arenas-Quintero, Natalia Aristizábal-Henao, María Del S Cabarcas-Solano, Jennifer Camargo González, Alejandro A Castellanos-Pinedo, Marta L Muñoz-Cardona, Katherine Restrepo-Erazo, Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea, María G Mejía-López
{"title":"Pharmacologic Therapies for Active Moderate-to-Severe TED: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.","authors":"Carlos E Builes-Montaño, Alejandro Román-González, Henry M Arenas-Quintero, Natalia Aristizábal-Henao, María Del S Cabarcas-Solano, Jennifer Camargo González, Alejandro A Castellanos-Pinedo, Marta L Muñoz-Cardona, Katherine Restrepo-Erazo, Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea, María G Mejía-López","doi":"10.1177/11795514261426446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease (TED) is a potentially vision-threatening inflammatory condition that requires timely, evidence-based medical management. Although intravenous glucocorticoids remain the mainstay of therapy, several biologic and immunosuppressive agents have emerged as potential alternatives, particularly in steroid-refractory disease.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic positioning of medical treatments for active moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through February 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational cohorts, and selected case series evaluating pharmacological interventions for moderate-to-severe TED. Outcomes of interest were proptosis reduction, Clinical Activity Score (CAS) improvement, diplopia response, and safety/tolerability. A semi-quantitative synthesis approach was used to integrate evidence across heterogeneous study designs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Intravenous glucocorticoids (IVGCs) demonstrated the most consistent efficacy in controlling inflammatory activity, with modest effects on proptosis and favorable tolerability at cumulative doses below 8 g. Among biologic therapies, teprotumumab showed the greatest magnitude of benefit across all efficacy domains but was limited by safety considerations and access constraints. Rituximab and tocilizumab demonstrated moderate efficacy, particularly in glucocorticoid-resistant cases. Mycophenolate mofetil emerged as the most reliable non-biologic immunosuppressive option. Oral glucocorticoids and several adjunctive therapies showed limited or inconsistent benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review provides an integrated framework to support therapeutic decision-making in moderate-to-severe TED. Intravenous glucocorticoids remain the most consistently supported first-line therapy, while IGF-1R-targeted biologic therapy offers the most comprehensive efficacy across key clinical domains in selected patients.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>Not registered.</p>","PeriodicalId":44715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"19 ","pages":"11795514261426446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12953964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Medicine Insights-Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514261426446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease (TED) is a potentially vision-threatening inflammatory condition that requires timely, evidence-based medical management. Although intravenous glucocorticoids remain the mainstay of therapy, several biologic and immunosuppressive agents have emerged as potential alternatives, particularly in steroid-refractory disease.

Objectives: To evaluate and compare the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic positioning of medical treatments for active moderate-to-severe thyroid eye disease.

Data sources and methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through February 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, observational cohorts, and selected case series evaluating pharmacological interventions for moderate-to-severe TED. Outcomes of interest were proptosis reduction, Clinical Activity Score (CAS) improvement, diplopia response, and safety/tolerability. A semi-quantitative synthesis approach was used to integrate evidence across heterogeneous study designs.

Results: Fifty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria. Intravenous glucocorticoids (IVGCs) demonstrated the most consistent efficacy in controlling inflammatory activity, with modest effects on proptosis and favorable tolerability at cumulative doses below 8 g. Among biologic therapies, teprotumumab showed the greatest magnitude of benefit across all efficacy domains but was limited by safety considerations and access constraints. Rituximab and tocilizumab demonstrated moderate efficacy, particularly in glucocorticoid-resistant cases. Mycophenolate mofetil emerged as the most reliable non-biologic immunosuppressive option. Oral glucocorticoids and several adjunctive therapies showed limited or inconsistent benefit.

Conclusion: This systematic review provides an integrated framework to support therapeutic decision-making in moderate-to-severe TED. Intravenous glucocorticoids remain the most consistently supported first-line therapy, while IGF-1R-targeted biologic therapy offers the most comprehensive efficacy across key clinical domains in selected patients.

Registration: Not registered.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

活动性中重度TED的药物治疗:一项全面的系统综述。
背景:中度至重度甲状腺眼病(TED)是一种潜在的威胁视力的炎症性疾病,需要及时的循证医学治疗。虽然静脉注射糖皮质激素仍然是主要的治疗方法,但一些生物和免疫抑制剂已成为潜在的替代方案,特别是在类固醇难治性疾病中。目的:评价和比较各种药物治疗活动性中重度甲状腺眼病的疗效、安全性和治疗定位。数据来源和方法:到2025年2月,对PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的搜索。符合条件的研究包括随机对照试验、荟萃分析、系统评价、观察性队列和评估中重度TED药物干预的选定病例系列。研究的主要结果是眼球突出减少、临床活动评分(CAS)改善、复视反应和安全性/耐受性。采用半定量综合方法整合异质性研究设计中的证据。结果:58项研究符合纳入标准。静脉注射糖皮质激素(IVGCs)在控制炎症活动方面表现出最一致的疗效,在累积剂量低于8 g时对预后的影响不大,耐受性良好。在生物疗法中,teprotumumab在所有疗效领域显示出最大的益处,但受到安全性考虑和准入限制的限制。利妥昔单抗和托珠单抗表现出中等疗效,特别是在糖皮质激素耐药病例中。霉酚酸酯成为最可靠的非生物免疫抑制剂。口服糖皮质激素和几种辅助疗法的疗效有限或不一致。结论:本系统综述提供了一个支持中重度TED治疗决策的综合框架。静脉注射糖皮质激素仍然是最受支持的一线治疗方法,而针对igf - 1r的生物治疗在特定患者的关键临床领域提供了最全面的疗效。注册:未注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书