Profiles of suicidal individuals: behavioral, emotional, and cognitive characteristics.

IF 1.6 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Health Psychology Report Pub Date : 2025-12-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.5114/hpr/211858
Andrew P D Blair, Junghye Jeong, Sih Lee, Mihyang Ju, Yang Lee
{"title":"Profiles of suicidal individuals: behavioral, emotional, and cognitive characteristics.","authors":"Andrew P D Blair, Junghye Jeong, Sih Lee, Mihyang Ju, Yang Lee","doi":"10.5114/hpr/211858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze behavioral, emotional, and cognitive characteristics that influence varieties of suicide. The theoretical framework drew on three perspectives: philosophical analyses of the purposes of suicide, sociological examinations its processes of propagation, and psychological analyses exploring its mechanisms through personal characteristics. These perspectives served as foundational resources for the study's design and for constructing a questionnaire used in the experimental analysis.</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>A questionnaire was constructed to manipulate two key variables: the type of suicidal purpose (public, mixed, or private) and the level of suicidal activation (active or passive), resulting in six hypothetical suicide scenarios, which allowed participants to observe the simulated cases of suicidal behavior. Participants (<i>N</i> = 205) were asked to respond to 18 items, categorized by three psychological characteristics across the six scenarios, using a 7-point Likert scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant variations were observed across the three types of suicidal purposes and the two activation levels. The patterns differed depending on the psychological characteristics, showing interaction between the two variables. Overall, suicides driven by private purposes showed higher behavioral propensity than those driven by public purposes. Emotional and behavioral responses were higher than cognitive ones, while cognitive activation was higher in public-purpose suicides.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that elevated emotional responses tend readily to transfer into suicidal behaviors. Behavioral propensity appears slightly lower in public-purpose suicides, which require stronger cognitive justification. These results suggest that suicide processes can be more precisely explained by considering psychological characteristics, while philosophical skepticism and sociological anomie have left certain ambiguities unresolved. Future research is encouraged to apply this design across diverse cultural contexts and to incorporate actual suicide cases to further validate the proposed model.</p>","PeriodicalId":44293,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Report","volume":"14 1","pages":"71-77"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12955769/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/hpr/211858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze behavioral, emotional, and cognitive characteristics that influence varieties of suicide. The theoretical framework drew on three perspectives: philosophical analyses of the purposes of suicide, sociological examinations its processes of propagation, and psychological analyses exploring its mechanisms through personal characteristics. These perspectives served as foundational resources for the study's design and for constructing a questionnaire used in the experimental analysis.

Participants and procedure: A questionnaire was constructed to manipulate two key variables: the type of suicidal purpose (public, mixed, or private) and the level of suicidal activation (active or passive), resulting in six hypothetical suicide scenarios, which allowed participants to observe the simulated cases of suicidal behavior. Participants (N = 205) were asked to respond to 18 items, categorized by three psychological characteristics across the six scenarios, using a 7-point Likert scale.

Results: Significant variations were observed across the three types of suicidal purposes and the two activation levels. The patterns differed depending on the psychological characteristics, showing interaction between the two variables. Overall, suicides driven by private purposes showed higher behavioral propensity than those driven by public purposes. Emotional and behavioral responses were higher than cognitive ones, while cognitive activation was higher in public-purpose suicides.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that elevated emotional responses tend readily to transfer into suicidal behaviors. Behavioral propensity appears slightly lower in public-purpose suicides, which require stronger cognitive justification. These results suggest that suicide processes can be more precisely explained by considering psychological characteristics, while philosophical skepticism and sociological anomie have left certain ambiguities unresolved. Future research is encouraged to apply this design across diverse cultural contexts and to incorporate actual suicide cases to further validate the proposed model.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

自杀个体的概况:行为、情绪和认知特征。
背景:本研究旨在分析影响自杀类型的行为、情绪和认知特征。其理论框架从三个方面展开:哲学分析自杀的目的,社会学考察自杀的传播过程,心理学分析通过个人特征探索自杀的机制。这些观点为研究设计和构建实验分析中使用的问卷提供了基础资源。参与者和程序:构建了一份问卷,操纵两个关键变量:自杀目的类型(公开、混合或私人)和自杀激活水平(主动或被动),产生六种假设的自杀场景,允许参与者观察模拟的自杀行为案例。参与者(N = 205)被要求回答18个问题,根据六个场景中的三个心理特征进行分类,使用7分李克特量表。结果:在三种类型的自杀目的和两种激活水平上观察到显著的差异。模式因心理特征的不同而不同,显示了两个变量之间的相互作用。总体而言,出于私人目的的自杀比出于公共目的的自杀表现出更高的行为倾向。情绪和行为反应高于认知反应,而公共目的自杀的认知激活更高。结论:研究结果表明,情绪反应升高容易转化为自杀行为。公共目的自杀的行为倾向略低,这需要更强的认知正当性。这些结果表明,通过考虑心理特征可以更精确地解释自杀过程,而哲学怀疑主义和社会学失范则留下了某些未解决的模糊性。鼓励未来的研究将这一设计应用于不同的文化背景,并纳入实际的自杀案例,以进一步验证所提出的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Psychology Report
Health Psychology Report PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
15.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书