Deep Learning Segmentation of Pectoralis Muscle Volume at CT and Comparison with Pectoralis Muscle Area in COPD.

IF 4.5 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daniel Genkin, Mustansir Verdawala, Sophie É Collins, Wan C Tan, Pei Z Li, Jean Bourbeau, Michael K Stickland, Dennis Jensen, Miranda Kirby
{"title":"Deep Learning Segmentation of Pectoralis Muscle Volume at CT and Comparison with Pectoralis Muscle Area in COPD.","authors":"Daniel Genkin, Mustansir Verdawala, Sophie É Collins, Wan C Tan, Pei Z Li, Jean Bourbeau, Michael K Stickland, Dennis Jensen, Miranda Kirby","doi":"10.1148/ryct.250060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop a deep learning model for segmenting pectoralis muscle volume (PMV) at CT and evaluate the reproducibility, group differences, and associations of pectoralis muscle area (PMA) and PMV with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related outcomes. Materials and Methods This study was a secondary analysis of the prospective Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease study (CanCOLD, data collected from November 2009 to July 2015). Randomly sampled CT scans from CanCOLD were used for model training, validation, and internal testing (<i>n</i> = 96, 16, and 32, respectively) and an external dataset for external testing (<i>n</i> = 32). A U-Net model was trained for PMV segmentation, and performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). PMA and PMV values were extracted from paired inspiration and expiration scans to assess segmentation reproducibility. Differences between individuals with or without COPD and associations with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV<sub>1</sub>), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco), and peak oxygen uptake during exercise (VO<sub>2</sub>) were reported. Results Individuals included those with (<i>n</i> = 634; mean age, 67.3 years ± 10.1 [SD]; 394 male participants) and without (<i>n</i> = 601; mean age, 65.8 years ± 9.6; 327 male participants) COPD. The model yielded DSCs of 0.94 ± 0.04, 0.93 ± 0.03, and 0.92 ± 0.04 in the training and validation, internal testing, and external testing datasets, respectively. Contrary to PMV (bias, 0.1 cm<sup>3</sup>; <i>P</i> = .77), PMA showed bias between inspiration and expiration (bias, -2.7 cm<sup>2</sup>; <i>P</i> < .001). Both PMA and PMV were reduced in patients with COPD (<i>P</i> < .05), but PMV was more strongly associated with FEV<sub>1</sub> (adjusted <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> [<i>R</i><sub>adj</sub><sup>2</sup>], 0.609/0.598), Dlco (<i>R</i><sub>adj</sub><sup>2</sup>, 0.645/0.627), and VO<sub>2</sub> (<i>R</i><sub>adj</sub><sup>2</sup>, 0.680/0.666). Conclusion An accurate and generalizable CT-based deep learning model for pectoralis muscle segmentation was developed. Compared with PMA, PMV showed better reproducibility and stronger associations with COPD outcomes. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, Thorax, Lung, Volume Analysis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Segmentation ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT00920348 © RSNA, 2026 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":21168,"journal":{"name":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","volume":"8 2","pages":"e250060"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryct.250060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose To develop a deep learning model for segmenting pectoralis muscle volume (PMV) at CT and evaluate the reproducibility, group differences, and associations of pectoralis muscle area (PMA) and PMV with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-related outcomes. Materials and Methods This study was a secondary analysis of the prospective Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease study (CanCOLD, data collected from November 2009 to July 2015). Randomly sampled CT scans from CanCOLD were used for model training, validation, and internal testing (n = 96, 16, and 32, respectively) and an external dataset for external testing (n = 32). A U-Net model was trained for PMV segmentation, and performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). PMA and PMV values were extracted from paired inspiration and expiration scans to assess segmentation reproducibility. Differences between individuals with or without COPD and associations with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (Dlco), and peak oxygen uptake during exercise (VO2) were reported. Results Individuals included those with (n = 634; mean age, 67.3 years ± 10.1 [SD]; 394 male participants) and without (n = 601; mean age, 65.8 years ± 9.6; 327 male participants) COPD. The model yielded DSCs of 0.94 ± 0.04, 0.93 ± 0.03, and 0.92 ± 0.04 in the training and validation, internal testing, and external testing datasets, respectively. Contrary to PMV (bias, 0.1 cm3; P = .77), PMA showed bias between inspiration and expiration (bias, -2.7 cm2; P < .001). Both PMA and PMV were reduced in patients with COPD (P < .05), but PMV was more strongly associated with FEV1 (adjusted R2 [Radj2], 0.609/0.598), Dlco (Radj2, 0.645/0.627), and VO2 (Radj2, 0.680/0.666). Conclusion An accurate and generalizable CT-based deep learning model for pectoralis muscle segmentation was developed. Compared with PMA, PMV showed better reproducibility and stronger associations with COPD outcomes. Keywords: CT, Thorax, Lung, Volume Analysis, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Segmentation ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no. NCT00920348 © RSNA, 2026 Supplemental material is available for this article.

COPD患者胸肌体积的CT深度学习分割与胸肌面积的比较。
目的建立胸肌体积(PMV) CT分割的深度学习模型,评估胸肌面积(PMA)和PMV与慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)相关结局的可重复性、组间差异以及相关性。材料和方法本研究是对加拿大前瞻性队列阻塞性肺疾病研究(CanCOLD,数据收集时间为2009年11月至2015年7月)的二次分析。从CanCOLD随机抽取CT扫描用于模型训练、验证和内部测试(n = 96、16和32),并使用外部数据集进行外部测试(n = 32)。训练U-Net模型用于PMV分割,并使用Dice相似系数(DSC)评估其性能。从配对的吸气和呼气扫描中提取PMA和PMV值,以评估分割的再现性。报告了患有或不患有COPD的个体之间的差异以及与1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、肺一氧化碳弥散能力(Dlco)和运动期间峰值摄氧量(VO2)的关系。结果个体包括慢性阻塞性肺病患者(n = 634人,平均年龄67.3岁±10.1岁[SD],男性394人)和非慢性阻塞性肺病患者(n = 601人,平均年龄65.8岁±9.6岁,男性327人)。该模型在训练与验证、内部测试和外部测试数据集上的dsc分别为0.94±0.04、0.93±0.03和0.92±0.04。与PMV相反(偏差,0.1 cm3; P = .77), PMA显示吸气和呼气之间的偏差(偏差,-2.7 cm2; P < .001)。COPD患者PMA和PMV均降低(P < 0.05),但PMV与FEV1(校正R2 [Radj2], 0.609/0.598)、Dlco (Radj2, 0.645/0.627)、VO2 (Radj2, 0.680/0.666)的相关性更强。结论建立了一种准确、可推广的基于ct的胸肌分割深度学习模型。与PMA相比,PMV表现出更好的可重复性和与COPD预后更强的相关性。关键词:CT,胸,肺,容积分析,慢性阻塞性肺疾病,分割ClinicalTrials.govNCT00920348©RSNA, 2026本文提供补充材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
1.40%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书