Effect of Stroke and Aging on Plantarflexor Strength and Voluntary Activation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Danny Shin, Kazandra M Rodriguez, Edward S Claflin, Chandramouli Krishnan
{"title":"Effect of Stroke and Aging on Plantarflexor Strength and Voluntary Activation.","authors":"Danny Shin, Kazandra M Rodriguez, Edward S Claflin, Chandramouli Krishnan","doi":"10.1177/09226028261425424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Plantarflexor strength and voluntary activation are key metrics for characterizing lower extremity function in stroke survivors. However, the extent to which stroke and/or aging affects these neuromuscular properties remains unclear. This study addressed this gap by testing plantarflexor strength and voluntary activation in fifty-two (stroke: 19, older: 15, young: 18) participants. Testing was done bilaterally in stroke survivors and on the dominant leg of the control participants using the central activation ratio (CAR) and interpolated twitch technique (ITT) with triplets. Stroke survivors demonstrated significantly reduced raw and mass-normalized plantarflexor strength on both legs compared with controls, and on their more affected leg compared with the less affected leg (all <i>p's</i> ≤ 0.02). Regardless of technique, voluntary activation was significantly lower only in the more affected leg compared with the less affected leg and control leg (all <i>p's</i> ≤ 0.02). Older adults also demonstrated lower plantarflexor strength (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.01), but not voluntary activation, compared with young adults. These findings indicate that both stroke and aging affect plantarflexor strength; however, voluntary activation is only affected by stroke. Additionally, quantification technique influenced voluntary activation estimates, with CAR consistently demonstrating higher activation relative to ITT. Collectively, these findings highlight the need for targeting plantarflexor strength and voluntary activation during post-stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21130,"journal":{"name":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"9226028261425424"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restorative neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09226028261425424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plantarflexor strength and voluntary activation are key metrics for characterizing lower extremity function in stroke survivors. However, the extent to which stroke and/or aging affects these neuromuscular properties remains unclear. This study addressed this gap by testing plantarflexor strength and voluntary activation in fifty-two (stroke: 19, older: 15, young: 18) participants. Testing was done bilaterally in stroke survivors and on the dominant leg of the control participants using the central activation ratio (CAR) and interpolated twitch technique (ITT) with triplets. Stroke survivors demonstrated significantly reduced raw and mass-normalized plantarflexor strength on both legs compared with controls, and on their more affected leg compared with the less affected leg (all p's ≤ 0.02). Regardless of technique, voluntary activation was significantly lower only in the more affected leg compared with the less affected leg and control leg (all p's ≤ 0.02). Older adults also demonstrated lower plantarflexor strength (p ≤ 0.01), but not voluntary activation, compared with young adults. These findings indicate that both stroke and aging affect plantarflexor strength; however, voluntary activation is only affected by stroke. Additionally, quantification technique influenced voluntary activation estimates, with CAR consistently demonstrating higher activation relative to ITT. Collectively, these findings highlight the need for targeting plantarflexor strength and voluntary activation during post-stroke rehabilitation.

脑卒中和衰老对跖屈肌力量和自主活动的影响。
跖屈肌力量和自主激活是表征中风幸存者下肢功能的关键指标。然而,中风和/或衰老对这些神经肌肉特性的影响程度仍不清楚。本研究通过测试52名参与者(中风19人,老年人15人,年轻人18人)的跖屈肌力量和自愿活动来解决这一差距。采用中枢激活比(CAR)和内插抽搐技术(ITT)对三胞胎的中风幸存者和对照参与者的优势腿进行双侧测试。与对照组相比,中风幸存者在两条腿上表现出明显降低的原始和大规模标准化的跖屈肌力量,并且与受影响较轻的腿相比,受影响较重的腿的跖屈肌力量明显降低(所有p≤0.02)。无论采用何种技术,与受影响较轻的腿和对照腿相比,只有受影响较重的腿的自愿激活显著降低(p均≤0.02)。与年轻人相比,老年人也表现出较低的跖屈肌强度(p≤0.01),但没有自发激活。这些结果表明,中风和衰老都会影响跖屈肌强度;然而,自愿激活仅受中风影响。此外,量化技术影响了自愿激活估计,CAR始终显示出相对于ITT更高的激活。总的来说,这些发现强调了在中风后康复期间针对跖屈肌力量和自愿激活的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
22
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal publishes papers relating to the plasticity and response of the nervous system to accidental or experimental injuries and their interventions, transplantation, neurodegenerative disorders and experimental strategies to improve regeneration or functional recovery and rehabilitation. Experimental and clinical research papers adopting fresh conceptual approaches are encouraged. The overriding criteria for publication are novelty, significant experimental or clinical relevance and interest to a multidisciplinary audience. Experiments on un-anesthetized animals should conform with the standards for the use of laboratory animals as established by the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources, US National Academy of Sciences. Experiments in which paralytic agents are used must be justified. Patient identity should be concealed. All manuscripts are sent out for blind peer review to editorial board members or outside reviewers. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience is a member of Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书