Evaluating the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software for pulmonary nodules in a resource-limited setting.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science Pub Date : 2026-02-14 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.25259/JCIS_212_2025
Xiwen Liao, Yifan Tian, Yaning Cheng, Xiaomeng Sun, Yan Li, Zhe Zhao, Chen Yao, Di Chen
{"title":"Evaluating the diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-assisted decision-making software for pulmonary nodules in a resource-limited setting.","authors":"Xiwen Liao, Yifan Tian, Yaning Cheng, Xiaomeng Sun, Yan Li, Zhe Zhao, Chen Yao, Di Chen","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_212_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emerging evidence suggested that artificial intelligence (AI) may offer particular benefits in resource-limited clinical settings with high patient loads and constrained radiology expertise. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an AI-assisted decision-making software (DMS) for pulmonary nodules detected on computed tomography (CT) among physicians in a resource-limited clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this retrospective multi-reader, multi-case study, three pulmonologists and three radiologists from a secondary hospital independently assessed 200 enriched chest CT scans with and without AI-assisted DMS. The dataset was balanced with 100 benign and 100 malignant nodules to provide a consistent challenge for both physicians and the AI system. Diagnostic performance was measured by comparing the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with and without AI support. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated at the 5% and 65% malignancy thresholds, and inter-reader agreement on disease management plans was examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI-assisted DMS significantly improved readers' diagnostic performance, with the average AUC increasing from 0.78 to 0.89 (mean difference: 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08, 0.14). Improvements were consistent across readers' experience levels and specialties. Sensitivity at the 5% malignancy threshold reached 97.3% (95% CI: 95.1%, 99.6%) with AI assistance, while specificity improved by 18.5% (95% CI: 6.5%, 30.5%). At the 65% threshold, sensitivity and specificity increased by 21.2% and 7.8%, respectively. In addition, the overall inter-reader agreement enhanced from 0.19 to 0.40 (<i>p</i> < 0.01), although agreement on non-surgical diagnostic procedures remained relatively lower compared to other categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI-assisted DMS showed great potential in improving diagnostic performance for CT pulmonary nodule management in the resource-limited setting. Strengthening referral pathways for intermediate-risk cases might further support appropriate clinical decision-making and help align patient evaluation with available expertise. Continued prospective real-world studies with longitudinal follow-up and histopathological confirmation would contribute to expanding the evidence base and guiding its broader integration into routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12954265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_212_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Emerging evidence suggested that artificial intelligence (AI) may offer particular benefits in resource-limited clinical settings with high patient loads and constrained radiology expertise. The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an AI-assisted decision-making software (DMS) for pulmonary nodules detected on computed tomography (CT) among physicians in a resource-limited clinical setting.

Material and methods: In this retrospective multi-reader, multi-case study, three pulmonologists and three radiologists from a secondary hospital independently assessed 200 enriched chest CT scans with and without AI-assisted DMS. The dataset was balanced with 100 benign and 100 malignant nodules to provide a consistent challenge for both physicians and the AI system. Diagnostic performance was measured by comparing the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) with and without AI support. Sensitivity and specificity were evaluated at the 5% and 65% malignancy thresholds, and inter-reader agreement on disease management plans was examined.

Results: AI-assisted DMS significantly improved readers' diagnostic performance, with the average AUC increasing from 0.78 to 0.89 (mean difference: 0.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08, 0.14). Improvements were consistent across readers' experience levels and specialties. Sensitivity at the 5% malignancy threshold reached 97.3% (95% CI: 95.1%, 99.6%) with AI assistance, while specificity improved by 18.5% (95% CI: 6.5%, 30.5%). At the 65% threshold, sensitivity and specificity increased by 21.2% and 7.8%, respectively. In addition, the overall inter-reader agreement enhanced from 0.19 to 0.40 (p < 0.01), although agreement on non-surgical diagnostic procedures remained relatively lower compared to other categories.

Conclusion: AI-assisted DMS showed great potential in improving diagnostic performance for CT pulmonary nodule management in the resource-limited setting. Strengthening referral pathways for intermediate-risk cases might further support appropriate clinical decision-making and help align patient evaluation with available expertise. Continued prospective real-world studies with longitudinal follow-up and histopathological confirmation would contribute to expanding the evidence base and guiding its broader integration into routine clinical practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在资源有限的情况下评估人工智能辅助决策软件对肺结节的诊断性能。
目的:新出现的证据表明,人工智能(AI)可能在资源有限的临床环境中提供特别的好处,这些环境中患者负荷高,放射学专业知识有限。本研究旨在评估在资源有限的临床环境中,人工智能辅助决策软件(DMS)对计算机断层扫描(CT)检测到的肺结节的诊断性能。材料和方法:在这项多读者、多病例的回顾性研究中,来自一家二级医院的三名肺科医生和三名放射科医生独立评估了200张有或没有人工智能辅助DMS的胸部CT图像。该数据集平衡了100个良性和100个恶性结节,为医生和人工智能系统提供了一致的挑战。通过比较有和没有人工智能支持的受试者工作特征曲线(AUC)下的平均面积来衡量诊断性能。在5%和65%的恶性阈值下评估敏感性和特异性,并检查疾病管理计划的读者间一致性。结果:人工智能辅助DMS显著提高了读者的诊断能力,平均AUC从0.78增加到0.89(平均差值:0.11,95%可信区间[CI]: 0.08, 0.14)。读者的经验水平和专业都有一致的改善。在人工智能辅助下,5%恶性阈值的敏感性达到97.3% (95% CI: 95.1%, 99.6%),特异性提高18.5% (95% CI: 6.5%, 30.5%)。在65%阈值下,敏感性和特异性分别提高21.2%和7.8%。此外,总体读者间一致性从0.19提高到0.40 (p < 0.01),尽管与其他类别相比,非手术诊断程序的一致性仍然相对较低。结论:在资源有限的情况下,人工智能辅助DMS在提高CT肺结节诊断性能方面具有很大的潜力。加强中等风险病例的转诊途径可能进一步支持适当的临床决策,并有助于将患者评估与现有专业知识结合起来。通过纵向随访和组织病理学证实的前瞻性现实世界研究将有助于扩大证据基础,并指导其更广泛地融入常规临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science
Journal of Clinical Imaging Science RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书