Ka Luen Hui, Wai Lam Wong, Ka Man Chu, Fong Ying Wan, Lok Yee Lam
{"title":"Papillary lesions of breast on core-needle biopsy: Factors associated with malignant upgrade on surgical excision.","authors":"Ka Luen Hui, Wai Lam Wong, Ka Man Chu, Fong Ying Wan, Lok Yee Lam","doi":"10.25259/JCIS_188_2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Papillary lesions (PLs) of the breast diagnosed on core-needle biopsy (CNB) pose a management dilemma due to their variable upgrade rates to malignancy. This study aims to identify predictors of malignant upgrade, facilitating risk stratification that may spare low-risk patients from unnecessary open surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 219 CNB-diagnosed PLs in 172 female patients at a tertiary center from 2008 to 2022. Clinical parameters (age at diagnosis, single duct bloody nipple discharge, mastalgia), sonographic findings (multifocality, size, location, intraductal lesion, intralesional vascularity, margin, posterior features) and histopathologic findings (atypia) were analyzed with Fisher's exact test and multivariate logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall upgrade rate to malignancy was 8.2% (18/219). Four independent predictors of upgrade were identified: lesion size ≥1 cm (Odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-12.3; <i>p</i> = 0.045), intralesional vascularity (OR 7.0, 95% CI 2.2-22.5; <i>p</i> = 0.001), non-circumscribed margins (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.5-27.7; <i>p</i> = 0.013), and atypia (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.9-23.2; <i>p</i> = 0.003). Subcentimeter circumscribed lesions without atypia and vascularity had a 3.4% upgrade rate (3/88) and 96.6% negative predictive value.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lesion size ≥1 cm, presence of intralesional vascularity, non-circumscribed margins, and atypia on CNB specimens are significant predictors of malignant upgrade in patients with PLs on CNB. Low-risk lesions (subcentimeter circumscribed lesions without vascularity and atypia) may be managed with minimally invasive approaches (e.g., vacuum-assisted excision) given their low upgrade rate (3.4%) and high negative predictive value (96.6%), while high-risk lesions (particularly those with atypia) warrant surgical excision.</p>","PeriodicalId":15512,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12954240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Imaging Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/JCIS_188_2025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Papillary lesions (PLs) of the breast diagnosed on core-needle biopsy (CNB) pose a management dilemma due to their variable upgrade rates to malignancy. This study aims to identify predictors of malignant upgrade, facilitating risk stratification that may spare low-risk patients from unnecessary open surgery.
Material and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 219 CNB-diagnosed PLs in 172 female patients at a tertiary center from 2008 to 2022. Clinical parameters (age at diagnosis, single duct bloody nipple discharge, mastalgia), sonographic findings (multifocality, size, location, intraductal lesion, intralesional vascularity, margin, posterior features) and histopathologic findings (atypia) were analyzed with Fisher's exact test and multivariate logistic regression.
Results: The overall upgrade rate to malignancy was 8.2% (18/219). Four independent predictors of upgrade were identified: lesion size ≥1 cm (Odds ratio [OR] 3.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-12.3; p = 0.045), intralesional vascularity (OR 7.0, 95% CI 2.2-22.5; p = 0.001), non-circumscribed margins (OR 6.4, 95% CI 1.5-27.7; p = 0.013), and atypia (OR 6.6, 95% CI 1.9-23.2; p = 0.003). Subcentimeter circumscribed lesions without atypia and vascularity had a 3.4% upgrade rate (3/88) and 96.6% negative predictive value.
Conclusion: Lesion size ≥1 cm, presence of intralesional vascularity, non-circumscribed margins, and atypia on CNB specimens are significant predictors of malignant upgrade in patients with PLs on CNB. Low-risk lesions (subcentimeter circumscribed lesions without vascularity and atypia) may be managed with minimally invasive approaches (e.g., vacuum-assisted excision) given their low upgrade rate (3.4%) and high negative predictive value (96.6%), while high-risk lesions (particularly those with atypia) warrant surgical excision.
目的:核心针活检(CNB)诊断的乳腺乳头状病变(PLs)由于其恶性肿瘤的升级率不同,造成了一个管理困境。本研究旨在确定恶性升级的预测因素,促进风险分层,使低风险患者免于不必要的开放手术。材料和方法:本回顾性研究分析了2008年至2022年在三级中心就诊的172例女性患者中219例cnb诊断的PLs。临床参数(诊断年龄、单管乳头溢血、乳痛)、超声表现(多灶性、大小、位置、导管内病变、病变内血管、边缘、后部特征)和组织病理学表现(异型性)采用Fisher精确检验和多因素logistic回归进行分析。结果:总恶性升级率为8.2%(18/219)。确定了四个独立的预后因素:病变大小≥1 cm(比值比[OR] 3.6, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.0-12.3; p = 0.045),病变内血管活动性(比值比[OR] 7.0, 95% CI 2.2-22.5; p = 0.001),非限定边缘(比值比[OR] 6.4, 95% CI 1.5-27.7; p = 0.013)和非典型性(比值比[OR] 6.6, 95% CI 1.9-23.2; p = 0.003)。无异型性和血管增生的亚厘米边界病变升级率为3.4%(3/88),阴性预测值为96.6%。结论:病变大小≥1cm、病灶内血管、边缘无边界以及CNB标本的非典型性是CNB上PLs患者恶性升级的重要预测因素。低风险病变(无血管和非典型性的亚厘米范围病变)由于其低升级率(3.4%)和高阴性预测值(96.6%),可以采用微创方法(例如,真空辅助切除)进行治疗,而高风险病变(特别是非典型性病变)则需要手术切除。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Imaging Science (JCIS) is an open access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Imaging Science. The journal aims to present Imaging Science and relevant clinical information in an understandable and useful format. The journal is owned and published by the Scientific Scholar. Audience Our audience includes Radiologists, Researchers, Clinicians, medical professionals and students. Review process JCIS has a highly rigorous peer-review process that makes sure that manuscripts are scientifically accurate, relevant, novel and important. Authors disclose all conflicts, affiliations and financial associations such that the published content is not biased.