Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization outcomes in double stimulation with conventional protocol in participants with poor ovarian response with minimal injection: An RCT.

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine Pub Date : 2026-02-14 eCollection Date: 2025-12-01 DOI:10.18502/ijrm.v23i12.20716
Shahla Farzipour, Ladan Kashani, Mahshad Khodarahmian, Kasra Jafari, Ashraf Moini
{"title":"Comparison of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization outcomes in double stimulation with conventional protocol in participants with poor ovarian response with minimal injection: An RCT.","authors":"Shahla Farzipour, Ladan Kashani, Mahshad Khodarahmian, Kasra Jafari, Ashraf Moini","doi":"10.18502/ijrm.v23i12.20716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In women with poor ovarian response (POR), the quantity and quality of oocytes produced by the ovaries decrease, resulting in poor-quality embryos. Ovarian stimulation, by increasing the number of oocytes and embryos, improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to compare intracytoplasmic sperm injection and IVF outcomes in double stimulation (DuoStim) with a conventional protocol in participants with POR and minimal injection.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 90 women with POR referred for IVF treatment at female infertility unit, Arash Women's hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Women were randomly assigned to either the DuoStim group, which underwent ovarian stimulation during both the follicular and luteal phases (n = 45) or the conventional group (n = 45). Finally, the number of recovered metaphase II oocytes and the number of oocytes retrieved were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of metaphase II eggs was 5.7 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.9 in the DuoStim group and 6.2 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.9 in the conventional group (p = 0.53). The mean total number of retrieved eggs in the DuoStim group was 7.2 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 4.5, and in the conventional group, it was 9.7 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 6.04 (p = 0.026). The mean number of embryos obtained in the DuoStim group was 4.5 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 3.9; in the conventional group, it was 4.7 <math><mo>±</mo></math> 2.8 (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In our study, the number of oocytes retrieved and the duration of ovarian stimulation were lower in the DuoStim group than the conventional group, and we reached the same number of oocytes and high-quality embryos in a shorter time.</p>","PeriodicalId":14386,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","volume":"23 12","pages":"1021-1030"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12926649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijrm.v23i12.20716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In women with poor ovarian response (POR), the quantity and quality of oocytes produced by the ovaries decrease, resulting in poor-quality embryos. Ovarian stimulation, by increasing the number of oocytes and embryos, improves in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare intracytoplasmic sperm injection and IVF outcomes in double stimulation (DuoStim) with a conventional protocol in participants with POR and minimal injection.

Materials and methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 90 women with POR referred for IVF treatment at female infertility unit, Arash Women's hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Women were randomly assigned to either the DuoStim group, which underwent ovarian stimulation during both the follicular and luteal phases (n = 45) or the conventional group (n = 45). Finally, the number of recovered metaphase II oocytes and the number of oocytes retrieved were measured.

Results: The mean number of metaphase II eggs was 5.7 ± 3.9 in the DuoStim group and 6.2 ± 3.9 in the conventional group (p = 0.53). The mean total number of retrieved eggs in the DuoStim group was 7.2 ± 4.5, and in the conventional group, it was 9.7 ± 6.04 (p = 0.026). The mean number of embryos obtained in the DuoStim group was 4.5 ± 3.9; in the conventional group, it was 4.7 ± 2.8 (p = 0.016).

Conclusion: In our study, the number of oocytes retrieved and the duration of ovarian stimulation were lower in the DuoStim group than the conventional group, and we reached the same number of oocytes and high-quality embryos in a shorter time.

Abstract Image

在少量注射卵巢反应差的参与者中,双刺激与常规方案的卵胞浆内单精子注射和体外受精结果的比较:一项随机对照试验。
背景:在卵巢反应差(POR)的女性中,卵巢产生的卵母细胞的数量和质量下降,导致胚胎质量差。卵巢刺激,通过增加卵母细胞和胚胎的数量,改善体外受精(IVF)的结果。目的:本研究的目的是比较双刺激(十二指肠刺激)与常规方案在POR和少量注射的参与者中进行卵胞浆内单精子注射和体外受精的结果。材料和方法:本随机临床试验对伊朗德黑兰医学大学Arash妇女医院女性不孕症部门转介的90名POR妇女进行体外受精治疗。妇女被随机分配到十二指肠刺激组(n = 45)和常规组(n = 45)。十二指肠刺激组在卵泡期和黄体期同时进行卵巢刺激。最后,测量恢复中期II期卵母细胞的数量和恢复的卵母细胞数量。结果:十二指肠组平均为5.7±3.9个,常规组为6.2±3.9个,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.53)。十二指肠组平均取卵总数为7.2±4.5个,常规组为9.7±6.04个(p = 0.026)。十二指肠组平均胚胎数为4.5±3.9个;常规组为4.7±2.8 (p = 0.016)。结论:在我们的研究中,十二指肠刺激组获得的卵母细胞数量和卵巢刺激持续时间都低于常规组,并且在更短的时间内达到了相同数量的卵母细胞和高质量的胚胎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
93
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM), formerly published as "Iranian Journal of Reproductive Medicine (ISSN: 1680-6433)", is an international monthly scientific journal for who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. This journal accepts Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Case Reports, Photo Clinics, and Letters to the Editor in the fields of fertility and infertility, ethical and social issues of assisted reproductive technologies, cellular and molecular biology of reproduction including the development of gametes and early embryos, assisted reproductive technologies in model system and in a clinical environment, reproductive endocrinology, andrology, epidemiology, pathology, genetics, oncology, surgery, psychology, and physiology. Emerging topics including cloning and stem cells are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书