Feasibility of Ecological Momentary Assessment in the Indian Context to Address Challenges Associated with Hearing-Aid Use.

IF 1.1 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Pub Date : 2026-03-03 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0045-1811655
Puttaraju Sahana, Chaithra M Chandrashekhar
{"title":"Feasibility of Ecological Momentary Assessment in the Indian Context to Address Challenges Associated with Hearing-Aid Use.","authors":"Puttaraju Sahana, Chaithra M Chandrashekhar","doi":"10.1055/s-0045-1811655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) involves the repeated real-time or near real-time sampling of individuals' behaviors and experiences within their natural settings, offering insights into the daily challenges experienced by individuals with hearing impairment.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to evaluate EMA's feasibility and construct validity in the Indian context, assessing its effectiveness in analyzing hearing aid outcomes at different times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve participants, aged between 49 and 66 (mean: 57.83) years, with bilateral hearing loss, participated in the study. A prospective cohort study was conducted from July to November 2023. Ecological momentary assessments were administered using a questionnaire hosted on Microsoft Forms (Microsoft Corp.), with links sent via WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.) 3 times daily over 10 days. On average, participants completed 3 surveys daily, each consisting of 15 questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 237 entries was collected, with a 65.83% compliance rate. Most entries highlighted the evident advantages of hearing aids, especially in quiet surroundings. Utilizing Friedman's and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for comparative analysis, significant variations were observed in EMA entries over time within identical listening environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The benefits of hearing aids in quiet environments were emphasized due to their capacity to restore audibility. The significant variations in individual preferences within the same environment emphasize the necessity for personalized hearing aid settings. These discrepancies in EMA entries highlight the importance of incorporating objective background noise measurements in surveys to optimize hearing aid performance. Ecological momentary assessment surveys provide valuable insights into listener preferences, facilitating optimal adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":13731,"journal":{"name":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"30 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12956388/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0045-1811655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) involves the repeated real-time or near real-time sampling of individuals' behaviors and experiences within their natural settings, offering insights into the daily challenges experienced by individuals with hearing impairment.

Objective: The study aims to evaluate EMA's feasibility and construct validity in the Indian context, assessing its effectiveness in analyzing hearing aid outcomes at different times.

Methods: Twelve participants, aged between 49 and 66 (mean: 57.83) years, with bilateral hearing loss, participated in the study. A prospective cohort study was conducted from July to November 2023. Ecological momentary assessments were administered using a questionnaire hosted on Microsoft Forms (Microsoft Corp.), with links sent via WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.) 3 times daily over 10 days. On average, participants completed 3 surveys daily, each consisting of 15 questions.

Results: A total of 237 entries was collected, with a 65.83% compliance rate. Most entries highlighted the evident advantages of hearing aids, especially in quiet surroundings. Utilizing Friedman's and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for comparative analysis, significant variations were observed in EMA entries over time within identical listening environments.

Conclusion: The benefits of hearing aids in quiet environments were emphasized due to their capacity to restore audibility. The significant variations in individual preferences within the same environment emphasize the necessity for personalized hearing aid settings. These discrepancies in EMA entries highlight the importance of incorporating objective background noise measurements in surveys to optimize hearing aid performance. Ecological momentary assessment surveys provide valuable insights into listener preferences, facilitating optimal adjustments.

Abstract Image

印度环境下的生态瞬间评估的可行性,以解决与助听器使用相关的挑战。
生态瞬时评估(EMA)包括在自然环境中对个体的行为和经历进行重复的实时或近实时采样,为听力障碍个体所经历的日常挑战提供见解。目的:本研究旨在评估EMA在印度背景下的可行性和结构效度,评估其在不同时间分析助听器结果的有效性。方法:12例双侧听力损失患者,年龄49 ~ 66岁,平均57.83岁。该前瞻性队列研究于2023年7月至11月进行。生态瞬间评估使用microsoftforms (Microsoft Corp.)上的问卷进行管理,并通过WhatsApp (Meta Platforms, Inc.)发送链接,每天3次,持续10天。参与者平均每天完成3份调查,每份调查包含15个问题。结果:共收集标本237份,符合率65.83%。大多数参赛作品都强调了助听器的明显优势,特别是在安静的环境中。利用Friedman's和Wilcoxon sign -rank检验进行比较分析,在相同的听力环境中,随着时间的推移,在EMA条目中观察到显著的变化。结论:在安静环境中使用助听器的好处在于其恢复听力的能力。在相同的环境中,个人偏好的显著差异强调了个性化助听器设置的必要性。EMA条目中的这些差异突出了在调查中纳入客观背景噪声测量以优化助听器性能的重要性。生态瞬时评估调查提供了听众偏好的宝贵见解,促进了最佳调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书