Challenges and Perspectives in Optimising the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension: Role of the Ramipril-Amlodipine-Hydrochlorothiazide Single-Pill Combination.

IF 2.9 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Roberto Pontremoli, Alberto Corsini, Massimo Volpe
{"title":"Challenges and Perspectives in Optimising the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension: Role of the Ramipril-Amlodipine-Hydrochlorothiazide Single-Pill Combination.","authors":"Maria Lorenza Muiesan, Aldo Pietro Maggioni, Roberto Pontremoli, Alberto Corsini, Massimo Volpe","doi":"10.1007/s40292-026-00785-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Globally, hypertension remains inadequately controlled, despite the availability of effective therapies and guideline recommendations. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on the clinical rationale, efficacy and implementation of single-pill combination (SPC) therapy to control blood pressure (BP), with a focus on an SPC containing ramipril, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. These agents offer complementary mechanisms of action and a favourable tolerability profile, supporting their use in dual and triple SPCs to overcome therapeutic inertia (failure to intensify therapy when BP goals are unmet) and improve BP control. Clinical trial and real-world data demonstrate that combination therapy leads to faster, more sustained reductions in BP, with better cardiovascular and renal outcomes compared with monotherapy. SPCs also improve adherence and persistence, reduce visit-to-visit BP variability and lower healthcare costs. The \"LESS is BETTER\" framework, advocating for Lower BP targets, Earlier BP control, Stronger therapy with SPCs for greater efficacy and Simpler regimens to improve adherence to therapy, provides a pragmatic approach for translating current guidelines into practice. However, barriers can hinder SPC adoption, such as physicians' limited attitudes to implement major international guideline recommendations, misconceptions about SPCs, limited use of ambulatory BP monitoring and suboptimal patient engagement. Strategies to overcome these barriers include clinician education, communication tools, flexible dose options and supportive healthcare policies. Taken together, the evidence supports broader adoption of the ramipril-amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide SPC as an effective therapeutic approach to contemporary hypertension management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12890,"journal":{"name":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","volume":" ","pages":"367-379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13283186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-026-00785-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Globally, hypertension remains inadequately controlled, despite the availability of effective therapies and guideline recommendations. This narrative review synthesises current evidence on the clinical rationale, efficacy and implementation of single-pill combination (SPC) therapy to control blood pressure (BP), with a focus on an SPC containing ramipril, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide. These agents offer complementary mechanisms of action and a favourable tolerability profile, supporting their use in dual and triple SPCs to overcome therapeutic inertia (failure to intensify therapy when BP goals are unmet) and improve BP control. Clinical trial and real-world data demonstrate that combination therapy leads to faster, more sustained reductions in BP, with better cardiovascular and renal outcomes compared with monotherapy. SPCs also improve adherence and persistence, reduce visit-to-visit BP variability and lower healthcare costs. The "LESS is BETTER" framework, advocating for Lower BP targets, Earlier BP control, Stronger therapy with SPCs for greater efficacy and Simpler regimens to improve adherence to therapy, provides a pragmatic approach for translating current guidelines into practice. However, barriers can hinder SPC adoption, such as physicians' limited attitudes to implement major international guideline recommendations, misconceptions about SPCs, limited use of ambulatory BP monitoring and suboptimal patient engagement. Strategies to overcome these barriers include clinician education, communication tools, flexible dose options and supportive healthcare policies. Taken together, the evidence supports broader adoption of the ramipril-amlodipine-hydrochlorothiazide SPC as an effective therapeutic approach to contemporary hypertension management.

优化高血压治疗的挑战与展望:雷米普利-氨氯地平-氢氯噻嗪单片联合用药的作用。
在全球范围内,尽管有有效的治疗方法和指南建议,但高血压仍未得到充分控制。这篇叙述性综述综合了目前关于单丸联合(SPC)治疗控制血压(BP)的临床原理、疗效和实施的证据,重点是含有雷米普利、氨氯地平和氢氯噻嗪的SPC。这些药物提供了互补的作用机制和良好的耐受性,支持它们在双重和三重SPCs中使用,以克服治疗惰性(当血压目标未达到时未能加强治疗)并改善血压控制。临床试验和实际数据表明,与单一治疗相比,联合治疗可更快、更持久地降低血压,并具有更好的心血管和肾脏预后。spc还可以提高依从性和持久性,减少每次访问的血压变异性,降低医疗保健成本。“越少越好”的框架,提倡降低血压目标,尽早控制血压,加强SPCs治疗以获得更大的疗效,并简化方案以提高治疗依从性,为将当前指南转化为实践提供了一种实用的方法。然而,一些障碍可能会阻碍SPC的采用,例如医生对实施主要国际指南建议的态度有限,对SPC的误解,动态血压监测的使用有限以及患者参与度不佳。克服这些障碍的战略包括临床医生教育、沟通工具、灵活的剂量选择和支持性保健政策。综上所述,证据支持更广泛地采用雷米普利-氨氯地平-氢氯噻嗪SPC作为当代高血压管理的有效治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention promotes knowledge, update and discussion in the field of hypertension and cardiovascular disease prevention, by providing a regular programme of independent review articles covering key aspects of the management of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. The journal includes:   Invited ''State of the Art'' reviews.  Expert commentaries on guidelines, major trials, technical advances.Presentation of new intervention trials design.''Pros and Cons'' or round tables on controversial issues.Statements on guidelines from hypertension and cardiovascular scientific societies.Socio-economic issues.Cost/benefit in prevention of cardiovascular diseases.Monitoring of healthcare systems.News and views from the Italian Society of Hypertension (including abstracts).All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书