Evaluating Mycelium as an insulation material: A comparative study on thermal performance, comfort, and energy efficiency.

Q2 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
F1000Research Pub Date : 2026-09-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.12688/f1000research.162989.3
Bassant Khaled, Nermine Hany, Gihan Mosaad
{"title":"Evaluating Mycelium as an insulation material: A comparative study on thermal performance, comfort, and energy efficiency.","authors":"Bassant Khaled, Nermine Hany, Gihan Mosaad","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.162989.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the building sector contributes significantly to carbon emissions, using sustainable materials is more crucial than ever. Mycelium is investigated in this study as a natural substitute for conventional insulation materials like rock wool and XPS. Its thermal performance has been evaluated in a residential building in New Cairo, Egypt, using Design-Builder simulations, paying particular attention to U-values, discomfort hours, PPD-PMV, and energy consumption. The results demonstrate that mycelium is environmentally safe, biodegradable, and provides insulation that is comparable to XPS. This demonstrates its promise as a sustainable option for building in the future.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This research uses Design-Builder software version 7.3.0.046 integrated with Energy-Plus to simulate the thermal conductivity of mycelium compared to two of the most frequently utilized traditional materials for insulation in Egypt, in Janna Compound, New Cairo. The analysis examines energy consumption, thermal comfort, Predicted Mean Vote (PMV), and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfaction (PPD%). The study provides a comparative evaluation of mycelium insulation compared to traditional materials like XPS and Rockwool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the simulation results, mycelium insulation performs comparably to XPS regarding U-values, discomfort hours, PPD-PMV, and energy consumption. Specifically, mycelium achieved a 0.323 U-value, reduced discomfort hours percentage to 16.9%, and achieved a ratio of energy reduction of 15.8% compared to the base case. These results demonstrate how mycelium has the potential to compete with traditional insulation materials while offering significant sustainability advantages, such as biodegradability and a lower carbon footprint.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In Janna Compound, New Cairo, the research shows how mycelium insulation can improve thermal comfort and save energy usage. It performs similarly to XPS but has more positive environmental effects. These results support the integration of mycelium into Egypt's sustainable housing practices, providing key insights for architects, developers, and policymakers focused on energy-efficient and sustainable urban development.</p>","PeriodicalId":12260,"journal":{"name":"F1000Research","volume":"14 ","pages":"459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12954402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"F1000Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.162989.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since the building sector contributes significantly to carbon emissions, using sustainable materials is more crucial than ever. Mycelium is investigated in this study as a natural substitute for conventional insulation materials like rock wool and XPS. Its thermal performance has been evaluated in a residential building in New Cairo, Egypt, using Design-Builder simulations, paying particular attention to U-values, discomfort hours, PPD-PMV, and energy consumption. The results demonstrate that mycelium is environmentally safe, biodegradable, and provides insulation that is comparable to XPS. This demonstrates its promise as a sustainable option for building in the future.

Methods: This research uses Design-Builder software version 7.3.0.046 integrated with Energy-Plus to simulate the thermal conductivity of mycelium compared to two of the most frequently utilized traditional materials for insulation in Egypt, in Janna Compound, New Cairo. The analysis examines energy consumption, thermal comfort, Predicted Mean Vote (PMV), and Predicted Percentage of Dissatisfaction (PPD%). The study provides a comparative evaluation of mycelium insulation compared to traditional materials like XPS and Rockwool.

Results: According to the simulation results, mycelium insulation performs comparably to XPS regarding U-values, discomfort hours, PPD-PMV, and energy consumption. Specifically, mycelium achieved a 0.323 U-value, reduced discomfort hours percentage to 16.9%, and achieved a ratio of energy reduction of 15.8% compared to the base case. These results demonstrate how mycelium has the potential to compete with traditional insulation materials while offering significant sustainability advantages, such as biodegradability and a lower carbon footprint.

Conclusion: In Janna Compound, New Cairo, the research shows how mycelium insulation can improve thermal comfort and save energy usage. It performs similarly to XPS but has more positive environmental effects. These results support the integration of mycelium into Egypt's sustainable housing practices, providing key insights for architects, developers, and policymakers focused on energy-efficient and sustainable urban development.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评价菌丝体作为隔热材料:热性能、舒适性和能源效率的比较研究。
背景:由于建筑行业对碳排放的贡献很大,使用可持续材料比以往任何时候都更加重要。本研究研究了菌丝体作为岩棉和XPS等传统保温材料的天然替代品。它的热性能已经在埃及新开罗的一座住宅建筑中进行了评估,使用Design-Builder模拟,特别注意u值,不适时间,PPD-PMV和能耗。结果表明,菌丝体对环境安全,可生物降解,并提供与XPS相当的绝缘。这表明它有望成为未来建筑的可持续选择。方法:本研究使用Design-Builder软件7.3.0.046与Energy-Plus集成,对埃及新开罗Janna Compound中两种最常用的传统保温材料的菌丝的导热性进行了模拟。分析考察了能源消耗、热舒适、预测平均投票(PMV)和预测不满意百分比(PPD%)。该研究提供了与传统材料(如XPS和Rockwool)相比的菌丝绝缘的比较评估。结果:根据模拟结果,菌丝保温在u值、不适时间、PPD-PMV和能耗方面与XPS相当。具体而言,与基本情况相比,菌丝体的u值达到0.323,将不适时间百分比降低至16.9%,能量降低率达到15.8%。这些结果表明,菌丝体具有与传统绝缘材料竞争的潜力,同时具有显著的可持续性优势,例如生物降解性和更低的碳足迹。结论:在新开罗的Janna Compound中,研究表明菌丝体隔热可以改善热舒适并节省能源使用。它的性能与XPS相似,但对环境的影响更积极。这些结果支持将菌丝体纳入埃及的可持续住房实践,为建筑师、开发商和政策制定者关注节能和可持续城市发展提供关键见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
F1000Research
F1000Research Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1646
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: F1000Research publishes articles and other research outputs reporting basic scientific, scholarly, translational and clinical research across the physical and life sciences, engineering, medicine, social sciences and humanities. F1000Research is a scholarly publication platform set up for the scientific, scholarly and medical research community; each article has at least one author who is a qualified researcher, scholar or clinician actively working in their speciality and who has made a key contribution to the article. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research is suitable irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; we welcome confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies. F1000Research publishes different type of research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others. Reviews and Opinion articles providing a balanced and comprehensive overview of the latest discoveries in a particular field, or presenting a personal perspective on recent developments, are also welcome. See the full list of article types we accept for more information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书