Comparison between bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension and ropivacaine as local anesthetics for transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
{"title":"Comparison between bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension and ropivacaine as local anesthetics for transversus abdominis plane block in postoperative pain management after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Yipeng He, Dandan Yin, Zhouquan Wu","doi":"10.1186/s40001-026-04153-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative pain management is critical for optimizing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), where transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is a standard analgesic technique. Ropivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for TAPB in LSG, has a short duration of action (4-6 h), which may be insufficient to control pain for up to 72 h and increase opioid dependence. Bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension (BLIS) provides extended analgesia (24-72 h) but has not been rigorously compared to ropivacaine in LSG-specific TAPB regarding 72-h analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effects, or ERAS-related outcomes. This randomized controlled trial was designed to fill this evidence gap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a single-center randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing LSG were randomized to receive TAPB with either bupivacaine liposomal suspension (n = 30) or ropivacaine (n = 30). The primary outcome was the VAS score from 4- to 72-h postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included analgesic drug use, motor function, sleep quality, and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with Group R, patients in Group B exhibited lower VAS scores from 4 to 72 h postoperatively, significantly reduced patient-controlled analgesia use, and markedly less need for rescue NSAIDs-approximately 75% lower than Group R (6.7% vs. 30%, P = 0.02). Although both groups ambulated within 24 h, no significant differences were observed in deep sleep proportion (24.3% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.90) or incidence of adverse events (20% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.50).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BLIS offers prolonged analgesic effects, extending up to 72 h, and significantly reduces the reliance on additional analgesics, making it a valuable option in multimodal pain management for LSG. However, its impact on enhancing ERAS-related outcomes requires further investigation. Trial registration registration number ChiCTR2500104979, registration date 2025-06-26 00:00:00 (retrospectively registered).</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04153-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pain management is critical for optimizing enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), where transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) is a standard analgesic technique. Ropivacaine, the most commonly used local anesthetic for TAPB in LSG, has a short duration of action (4-6 h), which may be insufficient to control pain for up to 72 h and increase opioid dependence. Bupivacaine liposome injectable suspension (BLIS) provides extended analgesia (24-72 h) but has not been rigorously compared to ropivacaine in LSG-specific TAPB regarding 72-h analgesic efficacy, opioid-sparing effects, or ERAS-related outcomes. This randomized controlled trial was designed to fill this evidence gap.
Methods: In a single-center randomized controlled trial, 60 patients undergoing LSG were randomized to receive TAPB with either bupivacaine liposomal suspension (n = 30) or ropivacaine (n = 30). The primary outcome was the VAS score from 4- to 72-h postsurgery. Secondary outcomes included analgesic drug use, motor function, sleep quality, and adverse events.
Results: Compared with Group R, patients in Group B exhibited lower VAS scores from 4 to 72 h postoperatively, significantly reduced patient-controlled analgesia use, and markedly less need for rescue NSAIDs-approximately 75% lower than Group R (6.7% vs. 30%, P = 0.02). Although both groups ambulated within 24 h, no significant differences were observed in deep sleep proportion (24.3% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.90) or incidence of adverse events (20% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.50).
Conclusions: BLIS offers prolonged analgesic effects, extending up to 72 h, and significantly reduces the reliance on additional analgesics, making it a valuable option in multimodal pain management for LSG. However, its impact on enhancing ERAS-related outcomes requires further investigation. Trial registration registration number ChiCTR2500104979, registration date 2025-06-26 00:00:00 (retrospectively registered).
背景:在腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)中,术后疼痛管理是优化术后增强恢复(ERAS)的关键,其中经腹平面阻滞(TAPB)是一种标准的镇痛技术。罗哌卡因是LSG中用于TAPB的最常用的局麻药,其作用时间短(4-6小时),可能不足以控制长达72小时的疼痛,并增加阿片类药物依赖。布比卡因脂质体注射悬浮液(BLIS)提供延长镇痛(24-72小时),但在lgs特异性TAPB中,还没有与罗哌卡因进行72小时镇痛效果、阿片类药物节约效果或erass相关结果的严格比较。这项随机对照试验旨在填补这一证据空白。方法:在一项单中心随机对照试验中,60例接受LSG的患者随机接受TAPB治疗,其中布比卡因脂质体悬浮液(n = 30)或罗哌卡因(n = 30)。主要观察指标为术后4 ~ 72小时的VAS评分。次要结局包括镇痛药物使用、运动功能、睡眠质量和不良事件。结果:与R组相比,B组患者术后4 ~ 72 h的VAS评分较低,患者自控镇痛药的使用明显减少,非甾体抗炎药的抢救需求明显减少,约比R组低75% (6.7% vs. 30%, P = 0.02)。两组均在24 h内活动,但深度睡眠比例(24.3% vs. 23.9%, P = 0.90)和不良事件发生率(20% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.50)差异无统计学意义。结论:BLIS提供延长的镇痛效果,延长至72小时,并显着减少对额外镇痛药物的依赖,使其成为LSG多模式疼痛管理的有价值的选择。然而,其对增强erass相关结果的影响需要进一步研究。试验注册注册号ChiCTR2500104979,注册日期2025年6月26日00:00:00(回顾性注册)。
期刊介绍:
European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.