Development and validation of a risk prediction model integrating WWI and lipocalin-2 for cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Kunyu Liu, Tong Niu, Junru Zhou, Ruoyu Sun, Shaohua Wang, Yang Yuan
{"title":"Development and validation of a risk prediction model integrating WWI and lipocalin-2 for cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes.","authors":"Kunyu Liu, Tong Niu, Junru Zhou, Ruoyu Sun, Shaohua Wang, Yang Yuan","doi":"10.1186/s40001-026-04164-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the associations of the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and plasma lipocalin-2 (LCN2) with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) -defined mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to develop a risk prediction model in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, 410 patients were included. Anthropometric parameters, metabolic indices, plasma LCN2 levels, and neuropsychological test data were collected. Participants were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). Cognitive function was assessed using neuropsychological tests. MCI was defined based on MoCA scores (< 26). Predictors selected using LASSO regression were subsequently entered into multivariable logistic models. Model performance-including discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility-was evaluated in both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WWI and plasma LCN2 levels were significantly higher in participants with MCI than in those with normal cognition (both P < 0.01). After adjustment for demographic and metabolic factors, WWI (OR = 1.753, 95% CI 1.337-2.299) and plasma LCN2 (per SD increase; OR = 1.680, 95% CI 1.255-2.248) remained independently associated with MCI. A multivariable model incorporating age, gender, education, WWI, and LCN2 demonstrated satisfactory discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.745 (95% CI 0.688-0.802) in the training cohort and 0.774 (95% CI 0.693-0.854) in the validation cohort], with acceptable calibration in both cohorts. The model showed higher discrimination than models based on individual predictors alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WWI and LCN2 are independently and jointly associated with MCI in T2DM, and their integration may improve risk stratification for cognitive impairment. These obesity- and inflammation-related markers may serve as complementary indicators to support cognitive risk assessment in diabetes care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11949,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04164-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the associations of the weight-adjusted waist index (WWI) and plasma lipocalin-2 (LCN2) with Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) -defined mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and to develop a risk prediction model in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 410 patients were included. Anthropometric parameters, metabolic indices, plasma LCN2 levels, and neuropsychological test data were collected. Participants were randomly divided into a training cohort (70%) and a validation cohort (30%). Cognitive function was assessed using neuropsychological tests. MCI was defined based on MoCA scores (< 26). Predictors selected using LASSO regression were subsequently entered into multivariable logistic models. Model performance-including discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility-was evaluated in both cohorts.

Results: WWI and plasma LCN2 levels were significantly higher in participants with MCI than in those with normal cognition (both P < 0.01). After adjustment for demographic and metabolic factors, WWI (OR = 1.753, 95% CI 1.337-2.299) and plasma LCN2 (per SD increase; OR = 1.680, 95% CI 1.255-2.248) remained independently associated with MCI. A multivariable model incorporating age, gender, education, WWI, and LCN2 demonstrated satisfactory discrimination [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.745 (95% CI 0.688-0.802) in the training cohort and 0.774 (95% CI 0.693-0.854) in the validation cohort], with acceptable calibration in both cohorts. The model showed higher discrimination than models based on individual predictors alone.

Conclusion: WWI and LCN2 are independently and jointly associated with MCI in T2DM, and their integration may improve risk stratification for cognitive impairment. These obesity- and inflammation-related markers may serve as complementary indicators to support cognitive risk assessment in diabetes care.

整合WWI和脂钙素-2对2型糖尿病患者认知障碍的风险预测模型的建立和验证
目的:评价体重调整腰围指数(WWI)和血浆脂载素-2 (LCN2)与蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)定义的轻度认知障碍(MCI)的相关性,并建立2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的风险预测模型。方法:本横断面研究纳入410例患者。收集人体测量参数、代谢指标、血浆LCN2水平和神经心理测试数据。参与者被随机分为训练组(70%)和验证组(30%)。认知功能用神经心理学测试评估。MCI的定义基于MoCA评分(结果:MCI患者的WWI和血浆LCN2水平显著高于认知正常的患者)。结论:WWI和LCN2与T2DM患者的MCI独立或共同相关,它们的整合可能改善认知障碍的风险分层。这些与肥胖和炎症相关的标志物可以作为辅助指标,支持糖尿病护理中的认知风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Medical Research
European Journal of Medical Research 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
247
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Journal of Medical Research publishes translational and clinical research of international interest across all medical disciplines, enabling clinicians and other researchers to learn about developments and innovations within these disciplines and across the boundaries between disciplines. The journal publishes high quality research and reviews and aims to ensure that the results of all well-conducted research are published, regardless of their outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书