Reframing lung transplantation through a sustainability lens.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001266
Owais Tisekar, Catherine A Doig, Caroline M Patterson
{"title":"Reframing lung transplantation through a sustainability lens.","authors":"Owais Tisekar, Catherine A Doig, Caroline M Patterson","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Lung transplantation is conspicuously resource intensive, yet the carbon footprint of solid organ transplantation, and lung transplantation in particular, remains relatively unmapped. Moreover, there is growing evidence that climate change adversely affects lung transplant recipients, directly and indirectly. This review explores opportunities to integrate sustainable practices across the lung transplantation pathway, with the dual aims of reducing environmental impact and reducing recipient morbidity and mortality.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Published literature outlines mitigation strategies to reduce the drivers of climate change, and adaptation strategies to modify the hazardous effects of the climate crisis on healthcare services. Opportunities to create \"green chains\" of transplant care start with appropriate recipient and donor selection, with both elements optimised to maximise operative success and avoid donor organ discard. The peri-operative phase offers scope for decarbonisation via the reduction of anaesthetic gas emissions, green procurement, and waste reduction. In the post-transplant phase, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes feed into longer term surveillance and care delivery, with increasing opportunities for telemedicine and noninvasive allograft monitoring, to reduce travel-related emissions.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The co-ordinated adoption of low-carbon, sustainable practices within lung transplantation offers a meaningful opportunity to reduce environmental harm, enhance healthcare infrastructure and workforce resilience, and improve patient outcomes in a patient cohort vulnerable to climate change. Lessons can be drawn from the global surgery movement; however, it remains the responsibility of transplant practitioners to foster a culture of environmental advocacy and to implement systematic measurement and targets for climate change and health indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"329-334"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001266","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Lung transplantation is conspicuously resource intensive, yet the carbon footprint of solid organ transplantation, and lung transplantation in particular, remains relatively unmapped. Moreover, there is growing evidence that climate change adversely affects lung transplant recipients, directly and indirectly. This review explores opportunities to integrate sustainable practices across the lung transplantation pathway, with the dual aims of reducing environmental impact and reducing recipient morbidity and mortality.

Recent findings: Published literature outlines mitigation strategies to reduce the drivers of climate change, and adaptation strategies to modify the hazardous effects of the climate crisis on healthcare services. Opportunities to create "green chains" of transplant care start with appropriate recipient and donor selection, with both elements optimised to maximise operative success and avoid donor organ discard. The peri-operative phase offers scope for decarbonisation via the reduction of anaesthetic gas emissions, green procurement, and waste reduction. In the post-transplant phase, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes feed into longer term surveillance and care delivery, with increasing opportunities for telemedicine and noninvasive allograft monitoring, to reduce travel-related emissions.

Summary: The co-ordinated adoption of low-carbon, sustainable practices within lung transplantation offers a meaningful opportunity to reduce environmental harm, enhance healthcare infrastructure and workforce resilience, and improve patient outcomes in a patient cohort vulnerable to climate change. Lessons can be drawn from the global surgery movement; however, it remains the responsibility of transplant practitioners to foster a culture of environmental advocacy and to implement systematic measurement and targets for climate change and health indicators.

从可持续发展的角度重新审视肺移植。
综述目的:肺移植明显是资源密集型的,然而实体器官移植的碳足迹,尤其是肺移植,仍然相对未被绘制出来。此外,越来越多的证据表明,气候变化直接或间接地对肺移植受者产生不利影响。本综述探讨了在整个肺移植途径中整合可持续实践的机会,具有减少环境影响和降低受体发病率和死亡率的双重目标。最近的发现:已发表的文献概述了减少气候变化驱动因素的缓解战略,以及改变气候危机对医疗保健服务的有害影响的适应战略。创造移植护理“绿色链”的机会始于适当的受体和供体选择,优化这两个要素,以最大限度地提高手术成功率,避免供体器官丢弃。围手术期通过减少麻醉气体排放、绿色采购和减少废物,为脱碳提供了空间。在移植后阶段,随着远程医疗和无创同种异体移植监测机会的增加,加强手术后恢复(ERAS)规划有助于长期监测和护理提供,以减少与旅行相关的排放。总结:在肺移植中协调采用低碳、可持续的做法,为减少环境危害、增强医疗基础设施和劳动力复原力、改善易受气候变化影响的患者群体的患者预后提供了有意义的机会。可以从全球外科运动中吸取教训;然而,移植从业者仍有责任培养一种环境倡导文化,并为气候变化和健康指标实施系统的测量和目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书