Comparative morphogenesis of mouse and rat mandibular first molars (M1): a review of developmental timing, structure, and signaling pathways.

IF 1.1 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Anatomy & Cell Biology Pub Date : 2026-06-30 Epub Date: 2026-03-05 DOI:10.5115/acb.25.354
Maryam Hameed Alwan
{"title":"Comparative morphogenesis of mouse and rat mandibular first molars (M1): a review of developmental timing, structure, and signaling pathways.","authors":"Maryam Hameed Alwan","doi":"10.5115/acb.25.354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rodents have been studied widely to evaluate the cellular and molecular mechanism of tooth development, although significant differences exist between them that impact how the researchers design their experiment. The mandibular first molar M1 is the most studied tooth in both species and provides a model for crown morphogenesis, root initiation, periodontal ligament organization, and the tooth eruption. In mice the M1 development is rapid, the crown complete at birth and the tooth eruption postnatal P20-21, while in rats the tooth development events are delayed, with larger tooth germs and tooth eruption at P17. However, rats provide advantages for microinjection, histology and biochemical assays due to their larger molar compared to mice. In comparison, mice provide an excellent model for genetic related studies. However, systematic side-by-side analysis is limited, leaving a gap in understanding how timing, genetic signaling, and eruption are related among species. This review focuses on current knowledge of rat-mouse M1 development and compares the two models to help the researcher to determine model selection, and experimental design, particularly when translating the finding to human development or pathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":7831,"journal":{"name":"Anatomy & Cell Biology","volume":" ","pages":"238-246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13291701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anatomy & Cell Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5115/acb.25.354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rodents have been studied widely to evaluate the cellular and molecular mechanism of tooth development, although significant differences exist between them that impact how the researchers design their experiment. The mandibular first molar M1 is the most studied tooth in both species and provides a model for crown morphogenesis, root initiation, periodontal ligament organization, and the tooth eruption. In mice the M1 development is rapid, the crown complete at birth and the tooth eruption postnatal P20-21, while in rats the tooth development events are delayed, with larger tooth germs and tooth eruption at P17. However, rats provide advantages for microinjection, histology and biochemical assays due to their larger molar compared to mice. In comparison, mice provide an excellent model for genetic related studies. However, systematic side-by-side analysis is limited, leaving a gap in understanding how timing, genetic signaling, and eruption are related among species. This review focuses on current knowledge of rat-mouse M1 development and compares the two models to help the researcher to determine model selection, and experimental design, particularly when translating the finding to human development or pathology.

小鼠和大鼠下颌第一磨牙(M1)的比较形态发生:发育时间、结构和信号通路的综述。
啮齿类动物被广泛研究以评估牙齿发育的细胞和分子机制,尽管它们之间存在显著差异,影响了研究人员如何设计他们的实验。下颌第一磨牙M1是两个物种中研究最多的牙齿,它为冠形态发生、牙根形成、牙周韧带组织和牙齿萌出提供了模型。小鼠的M1发育较快,牙冠在出生时完成,在出生后P20-21时出牙,而大鼠的牙齿发育事件较晚,在P17时牙胚较大,出牙。然而,由于大鼠的臼齿比小鼠大,因此在显微注射、组织学和生化分析方面具有优势。相比之下,小鼠为遗传相关研究提供了一个很好的模型。然而,系统的并排分析是有限的,在了解物种之间的时间,遗传信号和爆发如何相关方面留下了空白。本文综述了目前关于大鼠-小鼠M1发育的知识,并比较了两种模型,以帮助研究人员确定模型选择和实验设计,特别是在将发现转化为人类发育或病理时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anatomy & Cell Biology
Anatomy & Cell Biology ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书