Not all small bowel pneumatosis is ischaemia: a case-based systematic review of non-ischaemic causes.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
S Olusola, M Choudhry, V Panem, J Wilson, S Rana, C Parmar, M Kathirvel
{"title":"Not all small bowel pneumatosis is ischaemia: a case-based systematic review of non-ischaemic causes.","authors":"S Olusola, M Choudhry, V Panem, J Wilson, S Rana, C Parmar, M Kathirvel","doi":"10.1308/rcsann.2026.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) involving the small bowel is often interpreted as a radiological surrogate for ischaemia, prompting urgent surgical intervention. However, non-ischaemic causes-particularly in the postoperative setting-are under-recognised. This case-based systematic review aims to explore and synthesise reported non-ischaemic aetiologies of small bowel PI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present the case of a 74-year-old man who developed small bowel PI following ileostomy reversal, with computed tomography findings initially suggestive of bowel ischaemia. In the absence of clinical or biochemical evidence of sepsis, he was managed conservatively and made a full recovery. A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology across PubMed, Embase and Medline databases. Inclusion criteria focused on reports of small bowel PI in the English language. Data were extracted on clinical context, diagnostic modality, treatment and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 articles were included, comprising one retrospective cohort and 23 case reports, yielding 37 patients. The most frequent aetiology was small bowel obstruction (59.4%). Rarer causes included a rapidly progressive scleroderma-like disease, congenital lymphangioma and mechanical ventilation. Although 72.9% underwent surgical intervention, 27% were successfully managed conservatively. Only 10.8% had a suspected ischaemic component, and six patients died. Radiological overlap with ischaemic PI was common, yet several patients improved without surgery and only two (5.4%) had confirmed transmural small bowel necrosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Not all small bowel pneumatosis indicates ischaemia. Conservative management can be effective in carefully selected patients, guided by clinical status and serial imaging. Early recognition of non-ischaemic PI is crucial to avoid unnecessary laparotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":8088,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","volume":" ","pages":"500-509"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13529387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsann.2026.0011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pneumatosis intestinalis (PI) involving the small bowel is often interpreted as a radiological surrogate for ischaemia, prompting urgent surgical intervention. However, non-ischaemic causes-particularly in the postoperative setting-are under-recognised. This case-based systematic review aims to explore and synthesise reported non-ischaemic aetiologies of small bowel PI.

Methods: We present the case of a 74-year-old man who developed small bowel PI following ileostomy reversal, with computed tomography findings initially suggestive of bowel ischaemia. In the absence of clinical or biochemical evidence of sepsis, he was managed conservatively and made a full recovery. A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA methodology across PubMed, Embase and Medline databases. Inclusion criteria focused on reports of small bowel PI in the English language. Data were extracted on clinical context, diagnostic modality, treatment and outcomes.

Results: A total of 24 articles were included, comprising one retrospective cohort and 23 case reports, yielding 37 patients. The most frequent aetiology was small bowel obstruction (59.4%). Rarer causes included a rapidly progressive scleroderma-like disease, congenital lymphangioma and mechanical ventilation. Although 72.9% underwent surgical intervention, 27% were successfully managed conservatively. Only 10.8% had a suspected ischaemic component, and six patients died. Radiological overlap with ischaemic PI was common, yet several patients improved without surgery and only two (5.4%) had confirmed transmural small bowel necrosis.

Conclusions: Not all small bowel pneumatosis indicates ischaemia. Conservative management can be effective in carefully selected patients, guided by clinical status and serial imaging. Early recognition of non-ischaemic PI is crucial to avoid unnecessary laparotomy.

并非所有的小肠肺病都是缺血性:一项基于病例的非缺血性原因的系统综述。
背景:小肠肺肿(PI)累及小肠常被解释为缺血的影像学替代,提示紧急手术干预。然而,非缺血性原因,特别是在术后的情况下,没有得到充分的认识。这一基于病例的系统综述旨在探索和综合已报道的小肠PI的非缺血性病因。方法:我们报告一名74岁男性患者在回肠造口术逆转后出现小肠PI,计算机断层扫描结果最初提示肠缺血。在没有败血症的临床或生化证据的情况下,他接受了保守治疗并完全康复。使用PRISMA方法对PubMed、Embase和Medline数据库进行了系统评价。纳入标准侧重于小肠PI的英语报告。数据提取的临床背景,诊断方式,治疗和结果。结果:共纳入24篇文章,包括1篇回顾性队列和23例病例报告,共纳入37例患者。最常见的病因是小肠梗阻(59.4%)。罕见的病因包括快速进展的硬皮病样疾病、先天性淋巴管瘤和机械通气。72.9%的患者接受了手术治疗,27%的患者保守治疗成功。只有10.8%的患者怀疑有缺血性成分,6名患者死亡。缺血性PI的影像学重叠是常见的,但有几例患者在不手术的情况下得到改善,只有2例(5.4%)确诊为经壁小肠坏死。结论:并非所有的小肠肺病都是缺血性的。在精心挑选的患者中,根据临床状况和连续影像进行保守治疗是有效的。早期识别非缺血性PI对于避免不必要的剖腹手术至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
316
期刊介绍: The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England is the official scholarly research journal of the Royal College of Surgeons and is published eight times a year in January, February, March, April, May, July, September and November. The main aim of the journal is to publish high-quality, peer-reviewed papers that relate to all branches of surgery. The Annals also includes letters and comments, a regular technical section, controversial topics, CORESS feedback and book reviews. The editorial board is composed of experts from all the surgical specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书