Prognostic application regarding PILE score and the pan-immune-inflammation value in diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Chun Chang, Xiaoyong Man, Qi Hao, Wang Yan, Zhen Wang, Jingbo Wang
{"title":"Prognostic application regarding PILE score and the pan-immune-inflammation value in diffuse large B-Cell Lymphoma.","authors":"Chun Chang, Xiaoyong Man, Qi Hao, Wang Yan, Zhen Wang, Jingbo Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12865-026-00819-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>OBJECTIVE: This research explored the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) as prognostic significance factors in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). And we examined the PILE score, a composite parameter derived from lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and PIV as well. The findings were intended to contribute to more reliable prognostic assessment in clinical settings. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients diagnosed with DLBCL who accepted standard therapy consisting of a CD20 monoclonal antibody combined with the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone),with appropriate dose or cycle adjustments made according to age, cardiac function, and performance status.Specifically, CD20 monoclonal antibody was administered at 375 mg/m2 on day 0 of each 21-day cycle. CHOP consisted of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 (reduced to 30–40 mg/m2 in patients ≥70 years or with cardiac dysfunction), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, and prednisone 100 mg/m2 on days 1–5. Most patients received 6 cycles, while those with high-risk features received 8 cycles.A total of 16 patients with bulky disease, high-risk extranodal involvement, or suboptimal response to first-line chemotherapy as assessed by PET-CT received chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy.The PIV was established by integrating quantitative data on platelets, lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils obtained from routine peripheral blood tests. The PILE score was subsequently determined by integrating PIV with ECOG PS and LDH levels. Associations of PIV and PILE scores with treatment outcomes and prognosis were examined, and their potential relationships with pathological tumor characteristics were also evaluated. RESULTS: Elevated PIV was independently correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31–10.97; p = 0.0135), PIV was statistically significant in univariate analysis for PFS (P<0.001), making it the most robust prognostic marker among all assessed immune-inflammatory indices. Similarly, patients exhibiting higher PILE scores experienced significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS) and OS (p < 0.01, respectively). We evaluated the association of PIV, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and PILE with treatment outcomes by conducting both univariable Cox regression and multivariable logistic regression analyses, defining treatment response as the measured endpoint. While all markers showed significant association with the outcome in univariable analyses (p < 0.01, respectively) at statistical level, none demonstrated independent predictive capacity in multivariable models. Among DLBCL patients, the PIV demonstrated an independent prognostic significance for OS outcomes. Furthermore, the PILE score, along with other systemic immune-inflammatory markers, demonstrated potential utility in forecasting treatment outcome or response.</p>","PeriodicalId":9040,"journal":{"name":"BMC Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13067569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-026-00819-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This research explored the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) as prognostic significance factors in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). And we examined the PILE score, a composite parameter derived from lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) and PIV as well. The findings were intended to contribute to more reliable prognostic assessment in clinical settings. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 90 patients diagnosed with DLBCL who accepted standard therapy consisting of a CD20 monoclonal antibody combined with the CHOP regimen (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone),with appropriate dose or cycle adjustments made according to age, cardiac function, and performance status.Specifically, CD20 monoclonal antibody was administered at 375 mg/m2 on day 0 of each 21-day cycle. CHOP consisted of cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 (reduced to 30–40 mg/m2 in patients ≥70 years or with cardiac dysfunction), vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 on day 1, and prednisone 100 mg/m2 on days 1–5. Most patients received 6 cycles, while those with high-risk features received 8 cycles.A total of 16 patients with bulky disease, high-risk extranodal involvement, or suboptimal response to first-line chemotherapy as assessed by PET-CT received chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy.The PIV was established by integrating quantitative data on platelets, lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils obtained from routine peripheral blood tests. The PILE score was subsequently determined by integrating PIV with ECOG PS and LDH levels. Associations of PIV and PILE scores with treatment outcomes and prognosis were examined, and their potential relationships with pathological tumor characteristics were also evaluated. RESULTS: Elevated PIV was independently correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.79; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31–10.97; p = 0.0135), PIV was statistically significant in univariate analysis for PFS (P<0.001), making it the most robust prognostic marker among all assessed immune-inflammatory indices. Similarly, patients exhibiting higher PILE scores experienced significantly reduced progression-free survival (PFS) and OS (p < 0.01, respectively). We evaluated the association of PIV, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and PILE with treatment outcomes by conducting both univariable Cox regression and multivariable logistic regression analyses, defining treatment response as the measured endpoint. While all markers showed significant association with the outcome in univariable analyses (p < 0.01, respectively) at statistical level, none demonstrated independent predictive capacity in multivariable models. Among DLBCL patients, the PIV demonstrated an independent prognostic significance for OS outcomes. Furthermore, the PILE score, along with other systemic immune-inflammatory markers, demonstrated potential utility in forecasting treatment outcome or response.

弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤中PILE评分及泛免疫炎症价值的预后应用。
目的:探讨泛免疫炎症值(PIV)作为弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者预后的重要影响因素。我们还检查了PILE评分,这是一个由乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、东部肿瘤合作组织(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)绩效状态(ECOG PS)和PIV得出的复合参数。研究结果旨在为临床环境中更可靠的预后评估做出贡献。方法:我们回顾性分析了90例被诊断为DLBCL的患者,他们接受了由CD20单克隆抗体联合CHOP方案(环磷酰胺、阿霉素、长春新碱和泼尼松)组成的标准治疗,并根据年龄、心功能和运动状态调整适当的剂量或周期。具体来说,CD20单克隆抗体在每21天周期的第0天以375 mg/m2的剂量给药。CHOP包括环磷酰胺750 mg/m2,阿霉素50 mg/m2(≥70岁或有心功能障碍的患者降至30-40 mg/m2),长春新碱1.4 mg/m2,泼尼松100 mg/m2,第1 - 5天。大多数患者接受6个周期,而具有高危特征的患者接受8个周期。经PET-CT评估,共有16例肿瘤体积大、淋巴结外受累高风险或对一线化疗反应欠佳的患者接受化疗联合放疗。PIV是通过整合常规外周血检查中获得的血小板、淋巴细胞、单核细胞和中性粒细胞的定量数据来建立的。随后通过将PIV与ECOG PS和LDH水平相结合来确定PILE评分。研究了PIV和PILE评分与治疗结果和预后的关系,并评估了它们与病理肿瘤特征的潜在关系。结果:PIV升高与较差的总生存期(OS)独立相关(风险比(HR) = 3.79;95%置信区间(CI): 1.31-10.97;p = 0.0135), PIV在PFS的单因素分析中具有统计学意义(p = 0.0135)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Immunology
BMC Immunology 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Immunology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in molecular, cellular, tissue-level, organismal, functional, and developmental aspects of the immune system as well as clinical studies and animal models of human diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书