Evaluating Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Suicide-Risk-Stratified Veterans Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Maxwell Levis, Monica Dimambro, Joshua Levy, Brian Shiner
{"title":"Evaluating Evidence-Based Psychotherapy Utilization Patterns Among Suicide-Risk-Stratified Veterans Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder","authors":"Maxwell Levis,&nbsp;Monica Dimambro,&nbsp;Joshua Levy,&nbsp;Brian Shiner","doi":"10.1007/s10488-026-01495-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading risk factor for death by suicide. To better treat MDD, and reduce suicide risk, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, prioritizes a range of psychotherapeutic treatments, including MDD specific evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs). To better understand the utilization of these interventions, and these interventions’ roles in suicide prevention, this study investigates a national sample of MDD-diagnosed VA patients who died and did not die by suicide in 2017 and 2018. The study used a dataset of VA patients diagnosed with MDD who died by suicide and received psychotherapy in the year before death (cases) and patients who had comparable diagnoses, demographics, and received psychotherapy during the same interval and remained alive (controls). Each case was matched with 10 controls who shared the same VA’s suicide risk algorithm risk score. The study tracked non-differentiated psychotherapy and MDD EBP, analyzed cases and controls’ utilization rates across risk-tiers (high, moderate, low), and conceptualized eight sessions as the minimum adequate treatment. Our final sample included high-risk (cases = 257; controls = 2570), moderate-risk (cases = 428 cases; controls = 4280), and low-risk (cases = 53; controls = 529) patients. No groups received adequate session count. MDD EBP utilization was markedly low, especially among cases, with &lt; 1% of the high-risk sample receiving adequate sessions. Higher proportions of moderate- and low-risk controls received MDD EBP and received more sessions than matched cases. Even with VA efforts to promote EBPs, within our sample, MDD EBP usage was limited, particularly among patients who died by suicide. Further research is needed to understand utilization barriers and improve MDD EBP delivery to better support suicide prevention.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7195,"journal":{"name":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","volume":"53 3","pages":"281 - 292"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10488-026-01495-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading risk factor for death by suicide. To better treat MDD, and reduce suicide risk, the US Department of Veterans Affairs, prioritizes a range of psychotherapeutic treatments, including MDD specific evidence-based psychotherapies (EBPs). To better understand the utilization of these interventions, and these interventions’ roles in suicide prevention, this study investigates a national sample of MDD-diagnosed VA patients who died and did not die by suicide in 2017 and 2018. The study used a dataset of VA patients diagnosed with MDD who died by suicide and received psychotherapy in the year before death (cases) and patients who had comparable diagnoses, demographics, and received psychotherapy during the same interval and remained alive (controls). Each case was matched with 10 controls who shared the same VA’s suicide risk algorithm risk score. The study tracked non-differentiated psychotherapy and MDD EBP, analyzed cases and controls’ utilization rates across risk-tiers (high, moderate, low), and conceptualized eight sessions as the minimum adequate treatment. Our final sample included high-risk (cases = 257; controls = 2570), moderate-risk (cases = 428 cases; controls = 4280), and low-risk (cases = 53; controls = 529) patients. No groups received adequate session count. MDD EBP utilization was markedly low, especially among cases, with < 1% of the high-risk sample receiving adequate sessions. Higher proportions of moderate- and low-risk controls received MDD EBP and received more sessions than matched cases. Even with VA efforts to promote EBPs, within our sample, MDD EBP usage was limited, particularly among patients who died by suicide. Further research is needed to understand utilization barriers and improve MDD EBP delivery to better support suicide prevention.

评估自杀风险分层退伍军人重度抑郁障碍的循证心理治疗使用模式。
重度抑郁症(MDD)是自杀死亡的主要危险因素。为了更好地治疗重度抑郁症并降低自杀风险,美国退伍军人事务部优先考虑了一系列心理治疗治疗,包括针对重度抑郁症的循证心理治疗(ebp)。为了更好地了解这些干预措施的使用情况,以及这些干预措施在自杀预防中的作用,本研究调查了2017年和2018年死于和未死于自杀的mdd诊断的VA患者的全国样本。该研究使用了VA诊断为重度抑郁症的患者的数据集,这些患者死于自杀并在死亡前一年接受了心理治疗(病例),以及具有类似诊断,人口统计数据,并在同一时间间隔接受心理治疗并存活的患者(对照组)。每个病例都与10个具有相同VA自杀风险算法风险评分的对照组相匹配。该研究追踪了无区别心理治疗和重度抑郁症EBP,分析了不同风险等级(高、中、低)的病例和对照组的使用率,并将8个疗程概念化为最低限度的适当治疗。我们最终的样本包括高风险(257例,对照组2570例)、中度风险(428例,对照组4280例)和低风险(53例,对照组529例)患者。没有组获得足够的会话数。MDD的EBP使用率明显较低,特别是在病例中,只有1%的高风险样本接受了足够的治疗。中等和低风险控制组接受MDD - EBP治疗的比例高于对照组,且治疗次数多于对照组。即使VA努力促进EBP,在我们的样本中,MDD EBP的使用是有限的,特别是在自杀死亡的患者中。需要进一步的研究来了解使用障碍,并改善MDD - EBP的交付,以更好地支持自杀预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
50
期刊介绍: The aim of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services is to improve mental health services through research. This journal primarily publishes peer-reviewed, original empirical research articles.  The journal also welcomes systematic reviews. Please contact the editor if you have suggestions for special issues or sections focusing on important contemporary issues.  The journal usually does not publish articles on drug or alcohol addiction unless it focuses on persons who are dually diagnosed. Manuscripts on children and adults are equally welcome. Topics for articles may include, but need not be limited to, effectiveness of services, measure development, economics of mental health services, managed mental health care, implementation of services, staffing, leadership, organizational relations and policy, and the like.  Please review previously published articles for fit with our journal before submitting your manuscript.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书