Repeatability of keratometry depending on tear film osmolarity.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
David Schneider, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Petra Davidova, Thomas Kohnen, Tyll Jandewerth
{"title":"Repeatability of keratometry depending on tear film osmolarity.","authors":"David Schneider, Klemens Paul Kaiser, Petra Davidova, Thomas Kohnen, Tyll Jandewerth","doi":"10.1111/aos.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the repeatability of keratometry and astigmatism measurements of patients depending on the tear film osmolarity using three different devices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 97 eyes of 97 patients with a mean age of 64.92 ± 12.07 years received three repeated measurements with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), Pentacam AXL (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and Galilei G6 (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems, Port, Switzerland). After that, tear film osmolarity was obtained with the TearLab Osmolarity System (TearLab Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA) for quantification of dry eye disease. Four groups were formed depending on tear film osmolarity: group 1 (<300 mOsm/L), group 2 (300-310 mOsm/L), group 3 (311-320 mOsm/L) and group 4 (>320 mOsm/L). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and vector analysis were calculated to assess the repeatability of keratometry and astigmatism measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC values for keratometry were 0.957 or higher in all osmolarity groups. Highest ICC values for astigmatism were in group 1 with the Pentacam (0.986) and in group 2 (0.979), group 3 (0.951) and group 4 (0.950) with the IOL-Master 700 respectively. Highest astigmatism ICC value for the Galilei G6 was 0.884 in group 4 and the lowest in group 3 (0.405). Vector analysis of astigmatism showed no statistically significant difference between the osmolarity groups and IOL-Master 700 (p = 0.947), Pentacam (p = 0.353) and Galilei G6 (p = 0.660).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tear film osmolarity showed no consistent association with the repeatability of keratometry or astigmatism measurements for the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL whereas the Galilei G6 demonstrated lower repeatability overall.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.70117","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the repeatability of keratometry and astigmatism measurements of patients depending on the tear film osmolarity using three different devices.

Methods: In this study, 97 eyes of 97 patients with a mean age of 64.92 ± 12.07 years received three repeated measurements with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), Pentacam AXL (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) and Galilei G6 (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems, Port, Switzerland). After that, tear film osmolarity was obtained with the TearLab Osmolarity System (TearLab Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA) for quantification of dry eye disease. Four groups were formed depending on tear film osmolarity: group 1 (<300 mOsm/L), group 2 (300-310 mOsm/L), group 3 (311-320 mOsm/L) and group 4 (>320 mOsm/L). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and vector analysis were calculated to assess the repeatability of keratometry and astigmatism measurements.

Results: ICC values for keratometry were 0.957 or higher in all osmolarity groups. Highest ICC values for astigmatism were in group 1 with the Pentacam (0.986) and in group 2 (0.979), group 3 (0.951) and group 4 (0.950) with the IOL-Master 700 respectively. Highest astigmatism ICC value for the Galilei G6 was 0.884 in group 4 and the lowest in group 3 (0.405). Vector analysis of astigmatism showed no statistically significant difference between the osmolarity groups and IOL-Master 700 (p = 0.947), Pentacam (p = 0.353) and Galilei G6 (p = 0.660).

Conclusion: Tear film osmolarity showed no consistent association with the repeatability of keratometry or astigmatism measurements for the IOLMaster 700 and Pentacam AXL whereas the Galilei G6 demonstrated lower repeatability overall.

依赖于泪膜渗透压的角度测定的重复性。
目的:利用三种不同的仪器测定泪膜渗透压,确定患者角膜屈光度和散光测量的可重复性。方法:采用IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec,德国耶拿)、Pentacam AXL (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH,德国韦兹拉)和Galilei G6 (Ziemer Ophthalmic Systems,瑞士港口)对97例患者97只眼进行3次重复测量,平均年龄为64.92±12.07岁。之后,用TearLab渗透压系统(TearLab Corporation, San Diego, CA, USA)测定泪膜渗透压,定量测定干眼症。根据泪膜渗透压分为四组:1组(320 mOsm/L)。计算类内相关系数(ICC)和向量分析来评估角膜屈光度和散光测量的可重复性。结果:各渗透压组的ICC值均在0.957以上。Pentacam组(0.986)、IOL-Master 700组(0.979)、IOL-Master 700组(0.951)和IOL-Master 700组(0.950)ICC值最高。第4组Galilei G6散光ICC值最高,为0.884,第3组最低,为0.405。散光矢量分析显示,渗透压组与IOL-Master 700 (p = 0.947)、Pentacam (p = 0.353)、Galilei G6 (p = 0.660)之间差异无统计学意义。结论:泪膜渗透压与IOLMaster 700和Pentacam AXL的角膜测量或散光测量的重复性没有一致的关联,而Galilei G6的重复性总体上较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书