Comparison of oral health-related quality of life in a group of 19-year-old patients with or without previous orthodontic treatment.

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2026-03-04 DOI:10.2340/aos.v85.45522

Maryam Sonono, Linda Yousef, Sinan Dehrab, Marie Pegelow

{"title":"Comparison of oral health-related quality of life in a group of 19-year-old patients with or without previous orthodontic treatment.","authors":"Maryam Sonono, Linda Yousef, Sinan Dehrab, Marie Pegelow","doi":"10.2340/aos.v85.45522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the impact of orthodontic treatment on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) several years after orthodontic treatment.Material and methods: Thirty-two patients with previous orthodontic treatment and 31 patients without previous orthodontic treatment, aged 19 years, were included in the study. A questionnaire consisting of three parts was used: The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-S14), Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-20) and Orofacial Aesthetic Scale (OES). Previous orthodontic treatment, malocclusions and earlier dental treatment were registered.Results: There were statistical differences between the orthodontic group and the control group regarding the total OHIP-S14 (p = 0.03) and the total OES (p = 0.028), as subjects in the control group indicated less satisfaction. There were non-statistical differences between the two groups regarding the JFLS-20. When divided into the four domains of OHIP-14, only the psychosocial domain showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.006). No association was found between the decayed, missing and filled teeth index and total OHIP, total JFSL or total OES in both groups.Conclusion: Nineteen-year-old individuals who had undergone orthodontic treatment have a significantly better OHRQoL when compared to individuals without need for orthodontic treatment, specifically in the psychosocial and aesthetic domains.","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"85 ","pages":"109-115"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12966817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v85.45522","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of orthodontic treatment on the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) several years after orthodontic treatment.

Material and methods: Thirty-two patients with previous orthodontic treatment and 31 patients without previous orthodontic treatment, aged 19 years, were included in the study. A questionnaire consisting of three parts was used: The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-S14), Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-20) and Orofacial Aesthetic Scale (OES). Previous orthodontic treatment, malocclusions and earlier dental treatment were registered.

Results: There were statistical differences between the orthodontic group and the control group regarding the total OHIP-S14 (p = 0.03) and the total OES (p = 0.028), as subjects in the control group indicated less satisfaction. There were non-statistical differences between the two groups regarding the JFLS-20. When divided into the four domains of OHIP-14, only the psychosocial domain showed a statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.006). No association was found between the decayed, missing and filled teeth index and total OHIP, total JFSL or total OES in both groups.

Conclusion: Nineteen-year-old individuals who had undergone orthodontic treatment have a significantly better OHRQoL when compared to individuals without need for orthodontic treatment, specifically in the psychosocial and aesthetic domains.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

一组接受或未接受过正畸治疗的19岁患者口腔健康相关生活质量的比较

目的：评价正畸治疗对正畸治疗后数年口腔健康相关生活质量（OHRQoL）的影响。材料与方法：选取有正畸治疗史的32例患者和无正畸治疗史的31例患者，年龄19岁。采用口腔健康影响量表（OHIP-S14）、颌功能限制量表（JFLS-20）和口腔面部美学量表（OES）三部分组成的问卷。记录了以前的正畸治疗、错颌和早期的牙科治疗。结果正畸组OHIP-S14总分（p = 0.03）和OES总分（p = 0.028）与对照组比较有统计学差异，对照组满意度较低。两组间JFLS-20评分差异无统计学意义。在OHIP-14的四个领域中，只有心理社会领域在组间有统计学差异（p = 0.006）。两组龋缺补牙指数与总OHIP、总JFSL、总OES均无相关性。结论：接受过正畸治疗的19岁青少年的OHRQoL明显优于未接受正畸治疗的青少年，特别是在心理社会和审美方面。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊