Safety of prescribed drug use among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Midwestern Brazil: A cross-sectional study.

IF 0.8
Kethleen S D Oliveira, Bruna T Ruy, Carine F Correa, Paulo M A Lima
{"title":"Safety of prescribed drug use among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Midwestern Brazil: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Kethleen S D Oliveira, Bruna T Ruy, Carine F Correa, Paulo M A Lima","doi":"10.1177/09246479261432738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMedication use during pregnancy is common but safety data remain limited. The FDA previously categorized drugs from A-X, later replaced by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR), which provides narrative risk summaries, clinical considerations, and supporting data.ObjectiveTo assess the safety of medications prescribed to pregnant women in Midwestern Brazil using both FDA categories and the PLLR.MethodsThis cross-sectional study reviewed medical records of women receiving prenatal care at a university outpatient clinic in Goiânia, Brazil. Patient characteristics, prescribed medications, and trimester of use were recorded. Each drug was classified by FDA categories and evaluated for PLLR structure.ResultsOf 93 women, 76 (81.7%) received at least one prescription (41 drugs; 241 prescriptions), most during the first trimester (61.8%). Supplements were the most frequent (38.6%), followed by analgesics/anti-inflammatory (26.6%) and gastrointestinal agents (17.0%). FDA categories were: 14.6% A, 41.5% B, 29.3% C, and 7.3% D. Under PLLR, 17 drugs (41.5%) had complete information; among 24 incomplete labels, the Data section was most often missing (46.3%), followed by Clinical Considerations (14.6%).ConclusionsMost women received medications, mainly supplements and analgesics. Although FDA categories suggested low apparent risk, PLLR assessment revealed information gaps that limit evidence-based prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":520800,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","volume":" ","pages":"361-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of risk & safety in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09246479261432738","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMedication use during pregnancy is common but safety data remain limited. The FDA previously categorized drugs from A-X, later replaced by the Pregnancy and Lactation Labeling Rule (PLLR), which provides narrative risk summaries, clinical considerations, and supporting data.ObjectiveTo assess the safety of medications prescribed to pregnant women in Midwestern Brazil using both FDA categories and the PLLR.MethodsThis cross-sectional study reviewed medical records of women receiving prenatal care at a university outpatient clinic in Goiânia, Brazil. Patient characteristics, prescribed medications, and trimester of use were recorded. Each drug was classified by FDA categories and evaluated for PLLR structure.ResultsOf 93 women, 76 (81.7%) received at least one prescription (41 drugs; 241 prescriptions), most during the first trimester (61.8%). Supplements were the most frequent (38.6%), followed by analgesics/anti-inflammatory (26.6%) and gastrointestinal agents (17.0%). FDA categories were: 14.6% A, 41.5% B, 29.3% C, and 7.3% D. Under PLLR, 17 drugs (41.5%) had complete information; among 24 incomplete labels, the Data section was most often missing (46.3%), followed by Clinical Considerations (14.6%).ConclusionsMost women received medications, mainly supplements and analgesics. Although FDA categories suggested low apparent risk, PLLR assessment revealed information gaps that limit evidence-based prescribing.

在巴西中西部参加产前保健的孕妇中处方药使用的安全性:一项横断面研究。
背景:怀孕期间使用药物很常见,但安全性数据仍然有限。FDA之前将药物分类为A-X,后来被妊娠和哺乳标签规则(PLLR)取代,该规则提供叙事风险摘要,临床考虑和支持数据。目的评估巴西中西部孕妇使用FDA和PLLR两种分类的药物的安全性。方法:本横断面研究回顾了在巴西goinia的一所大学门诊接受产前护理的妇女的医疗记录。记录患者特征、处方药物和使用的三个月。每种药物按FDA分类并评估PLLR结构。结果93例妇女中,76例(81.7%)至少服用过一次处方(41种药物,241张处方),其中孕早期用药最多(61.8%)。补充剂是最常见的(38.6%),其次是镇痛/抗炎药(26.6%)和胃肠道药物(17.0%)。FDA分类为:A类14.6%,B类41.5%,C类29.3%,d类7.3%。在PLLR下,17种药物(41.5%)信息完整;在24个不完整的标签中,数据部分最常缺失(46.3%),其次是临床考虑(14.6%)。结论大多数妇女接受了药物治疗,主要是补充剂和镇痛药。尽管FDA分类提示低表观风险,但PLLR评估显示信息差距限制了循证处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书