Experimentally Induced Post-Event Rumination Alters Biological Stress Response Patterns to Repeated Stress.

Biopsychosocial science and medicine Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-27 DOI:10.1097/PSY.0000000000001458
Johanna Janson-Schmitt, Jesaja Haessner, Reimar Moeller, Nicolas Rohleder
{"title":"Experimentally Induced Post-Event Rumination Alters Biological Stress Response Patterns to Repeated Stress.","authors":"Johanna Janson-Schmitt, Jesaja Haessner, Reimar Moeller, Nicolas Rohleder","doi":"10.1097/PSY.0000000000001458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Rumination-the repetitive negative thinking about stressful events-impairs biological stress system activity. However, its impact on the habituation of stress responses, particularly of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, remains understudied. This study examined how post-event rumination affects the habituation of biological responses to repeated stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized experimental study, 47 participants were assigned to a rumination or control condition and exposed to two consecutive stress tasks. After the first stress exposure, the rumination group engaged in guided post-event rumination, while the control group reflected on a neutral everyday topic. Biological markers of HPA axis (cortisol) and SNS activity (salivary alpha-amylase, sAA), as well as psychological variables (positive and negative affect, state rumination), were assessed before and after each stressor.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control group, participants in the rumination condition showed reduced habituation of HPA axis activity ( t(45) =-2.01, p =.025) and increased SNS activation over time, as indicated by rising sAA levels ( t(45) =-2.03, p =.024). No significant group differences were observed in self-reported affect or state rumination.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-event rumination impairs biological habituation to repeated stress. These findings suggest that rumination disrupts physiological stress adaptation, which may contribute to prolonged stress responses and increased risk for stress-related health problems. Interventions targeting rumination may support more adaptive stress regulation and promote better health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520402,"journal":{"name":"Biopsychosocial science and medicine","volume":" ","pages":"322-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biopsychosocial science and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000001458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/11/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Rumination-the repetitive negative thinking about stressful events-impairs biological stress system activity. However, its impact on the habituation of stress responses, particularly of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, remains understudied. This study examined how post-event rumination affects the habituation of biological responses to repeated stress.

Methods: In this randomized experimental study, 47 participants were assigned to a rumination or control condition and exposed to two consecutive stress tasks. After the first stress exposure, the rumination group engaged in guided post-event rumination, while the control group reflected on a neutral everyday topic. Biological markers of HPA axis (cortisol) and SNS activity (salivary alpha-amylase, sAA), as well as psychological variables (positive and negative affect, state rumination), were assessed before and after each stressor.

Results: Compared with the control group, participants in the rumination condition showed reduced habituation of HPA axis activity ( t(45) =-2.01, p =.025) and increased SNS activation over time, as indicated by rising sAA levels ( t(45) =-2.03, p =.024). No significant group differences were observed in self-reported affect or state rumination.

Conclusions: Post-event rumination impairs biological habituation to repeated stress. These findings suggest that rumination disrupts physiological stress adaptation, which may contribute to prolonged stress responses and increased risk for stress-related health problems. Interventions targeting rumination may support more adaptive stress regulation and promote better health outcomes.

实验诱导的事后反刍改变了生物对重复应激的应激反应模式。
目的:反刍——对压力事件的反复消极思考——会损害生物应激系统的活动。然而,其对应激反应习惯化的影响,特别是交感神经系统(SNS)和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴的影响,仍未得到充分研究。本研究考察了事件后反刍如何影响对重复压力的生物反应的习惯化。方法:在随机实验研究中,47名参与者被分配到反刍或控制条件下,并暴露于两个连续的压力任务中。在第一次压力暴露后,反刍组进行了引导后事件反刍,而对照组则进行了中性的日常话题反思。在每个应激源之前和之后,评估HPA轴和SNS活性的生物学标志物(皮质醇和唾液α -淀粉酶,sAA)以及心理变量(积极和消极影响,状态反思性)。结果:与对照组相比,反刍条件下的参与者HPA轴活动的习惯化程度降低(t(45)=-2.01, P= 0.025), SNS活动随着时间的推移而增加,这表明sAA水平升高(t(45)=-2.03, P= 0.024)。在自我报告的情感或状态反刍方面没有观察到显著的组间差异。结论:事件后反刍损害了重复应激的生物习惯。这些发现表明,反刍会破坏生理应激适应,这可能会导致应激反应延长,并增加与压力相关的健康问题的风险。针对反刍的干预措施可能支持更多的适应性压力调节,并促进更好的健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书