Disparities in Patient Portal Access and Their Association with Perceived Health Care Quality Among U.S. Adults: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2026-02-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol19.24775
Samuel Ofei-Dodoo, Hailey Rounsley, Yessin Wael, Hayrettin Okut, Tiffany Huynh, Kaidyn Smith, Katelyn Cunningham, Fernanda Reyes
{"title":"Disparities in Patient Portal Access and Their Association with Perceived Health Care Quality Among U.S. Adults: A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Samuel Ofei-Dodoo, Hailey Rounsley, Yessin Wael, Hayrettin Okut, Tiffany Huynh, Kaidyn Smith, Katelyn Cunningham, Fernanda Reyes","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol19.24775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patient portals are designed to improve transparency, engagement, and satisfaction with health care. However, disparities in access and encouragement to use portals persist, and their relationship with perceived care quality is not well understood. Authors of this study examined whether being offered access to a patient portal, and being encouraged to use it, were associated with higher perceived quality of care among United States adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors analyzed data from the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey 7 (HINT 7), a nationally representative cross-section of United States adults aged ≥18 years. Weighted analyses assessed associations between portal access offers, encouragement, and self-rated care quality in the past 12 months, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 7,278 respondents (mean [SD] age, 49.0 [18.0] years), 78.6% rated their care as good, very good, or excellent. Overall, 73% had portal access and 69.0% were encouraged to use a portal. The number of respondents offered access to patient portal was significantly lower among older adults ≥75 years (10.6%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>8</sub>=108.2, p <0.0001), women (27.9%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>4</sub>=31.7, p <0.0001), those with lower income (8.3%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>10</sub>=158.0, p <0.0001) or education (13.6%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>6</sub>=107.9, p <0.0001), and rural residents (10.0%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>2</sub>=12.1, p = 0.0024). In adjusted analyses, being offered portal access was associated with higher odds of rating care as excellent (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.21-5.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Being offered portal access independently was associated with higher perceived care quality. Addressing disparities in portal access; especially among older, lower-income, and rural populations; may improve equity in patient experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"19 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12952948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol19.24775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patient portals are designed to improve transparency, engagement, and satisfaction with health care. However, disparities in access and encouragement to use portals persist, and their relationship with perceived care quality is not well understood. Authors of this study examined whether being offered access to a patient portal, and being encouraged to use it, were associated with higher perceived quality of care among United States adults.

Methods: The authors analyzed data from the 2024 Health Information National Trends Survey 7 (HINT 7), a nationally representative cross-section of United States adults aged ≥18 years. Weighted analyses assessed associations between portal access offers, encouragement, and self-rated care quality in the past 12 months, adjusting for sociodemographic characteristics.

Results: Among 7,278 respondents (mean [SD] age, 49.0 [18.0] years), 78.6% rated their care as good, very good, or excellent. Overall, 73% had portal access and 69.0% were encouraged to use a portal. The number of respondents offered access to patient portal was significantly lower among older adults ≥75 years (10.6%; χ2 8=108.2, p <0.0001), women (27.9%; χ2 4=31.7, p <0.0001), those with lower income (8.3%; χ2 10=158.0, p <0.0001) or education (13.6%; χ2 6=107.9, p <0.0001), and rural residents (10.0%; χ2 2=12.1, p = 0.0024). In adjusted analyses, being offered portal access was associated with higher odds of rating care as excellent (aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.21-5.07).

Conclusions: Being offered portal access independently was associated with higher perceived care quality. Addressing disparities in portal access; especially among older, lower-income, and rural populations; may improve equity in patient experience.

美国成人患者门户访问的差异及其与感知卫生保健质量的关系:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
简介:患者门户网站旨在提高透明度、参与度和对医疗保健的满意度。然而,在访问和鼓励使用门户网站方面的差异仍然存在,并且它们与感知护理质量的关系尚未得到很好的理解。本研究的作者调查了在美国成年人中,是否提供访问病人门户网站的机会,并鼓励他们使用它,与更高的护理质量有关。方法:作者分析了2024年健康信息国家趋势调查7 (HINT 7)的数据,这是一个具有全国代表性的年龄≥18岁的美国成年人的横截面。加权分析评估了过去12个月内门户网站访问提供、鼓励和自评护理质量之间的关系,并根据社会人口统计学特征进行了调整。结果:7278名受访者(平均[SD]年龄49.0[18.0]岁)中,78.6%的人认为他们的护理良好、非常好或优秀。总体而言,73%的人可以访问门户,69.0%的人被鼓励使用门户。在≥75岁的老年人中,提供患者门户访问的应答者数量显著减少(10.6%;χ 28 =108.2, p 24 =31.7, p 10=158.0, p 26 =107.9, p 22 =12.1, p = 0.0024)。在调整分析中,提供门户网站访问与将护理评为优秀的几率较高相关(aOR 2.47, 95% CI 1.21-5.07)。结论:独立提供门户访问与更高的感知护理质量相关。解决门户访问方面的差异;尤其是老年人、低收入者和农村人口;可以提高患者体验的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书