Effect of Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Programs on Incidence and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 1.5
Journal of prevention (2022) Pub Date : 2026-08-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-04 DOI:10.1007/s10935-026-00908-8
Ivana Nikcevic Kovacevic, Aleksa Jovanovic, Jovana Ristic, Natasa Milic, Tatjana Pekmezovic
{"title":"Effect of Organized Cervical Cancer Screening Programs on Incidence and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Ivana Nikcevic Kovacevic, Aleksa Jovanovic, Jovana Ristic, Natasa Milic, Tatjana Pekmezovic","doi":"10.1007/s10935-026-00908-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the impact of organized screening programs on incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer in women. A systematic review of the relevant literature was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 protocol by searching PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Endnote20 and Rayyan Systematic Review Screening Software were used for duplicate removal and then, independent evaluation was done by two reviewers. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed in order to compute the pooled effect size, with Hartung-Knapp adjustment for random effects model. DerSimonian-Laird estimator for Tau<sup>2</sup>, Mantel-Haenszel estimator used in calculation of Q and Tau<sup>2</sup>, and calculation of I<sup>2</sup> based on Q were used to assess and quantify heterogeneity between studies. Inverse variance method was also used. The results of the meta-analysis show that women who were regularly screened in an organized cervical cancer screening program were statistically significantly less likely to develop (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.55) or die (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.58) from cervical cancer. Significant heterogeneity among the case-control studies evaluating the incidence of cervical cancer has been detected (Tau<sup>2</sup> = 0.1034; χ<sup>2</sup> = 245.42; df = 12, p < 0.0001; I<sup>2</sup> = 95.1%). Moderate to high heterogeneity among the case-control studies evaluating the mortality has been detected (Tau<sup>2</sup> = 0.1161; χ<sup>2</sup> = 20.12; df = 3, p < 0.0002; I<sup>2</sup> = 85.1%). The results of tests for assessing asymmetry (Egger's and Begg's test, p < 0.05), indicates the absence of publication biases. The results of our meta-analysis show that women who participate in organized screening programs are significantly less likely to develop and die from cervical cancer, especially if they are screened regularly. Women who irregularly participated in an organized cervical cancer screening program have almost equal risk for cervical cancer compared to women who did not participate in an organized cervical cancer screening program. Women with irregular participation in an organized cervical cancer screening program have a cervical cancer risk that is nearly comparable to the risk among non-participants.</p>","PeriodicalId":73905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of prevention (2022)","volume":" ","pages":"739-757"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of prevention (2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-026-00908-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of organized screening programs on incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer in women. A systematic review of the relevant literature was performed in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 protocol by searching PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. Endnote20 and Rayyan Systematic Review Screening Software were used for duplicate removal and then, independent evaluation was done by two reviewers. The quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa scale. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed in order to compute the pooled effect size, with Hartung-Knapp adjustment for random effects model. DerSimonian-Laird estimator for Tau2, Mantel-Haenszel estimator used in calculation of Q and Tau2, and calculation of I2 based on Q were used to assess and quantify heterogeneity between studies. Inverse variance method was also used. The results of the meta-analysis show that women who were regularly screened in an organized cervical cancer screening program were statistically significantly less likely to develop (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.55) or die (OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.58) from cervical cancer. Significant heterogeneity among the case-control studies evaluating the incidence of cervical cancer has been detected (Tau2 = 0.1034; χ2 = 245.42; df = 12, p < 0.0001; I2 = 95.1%). Moderate to high heterogeneity among the case-control studies evaluating the mortality has been detected (Tau2 = 0.1161; χ2 = 20.12; df = 3, p < 0.0002; I2 = 85.1%). The results of tests for assessing asymmetry (Egger's and Begg's test, p < 0.05), indicates the absence of publication biases. The results of our meta-analysis show that women who participate in organized screening programs are significantly less likely to develop and die from cervical cancer, especially if they are screened regularly. Women who irregularly participated in an organized cervical cancer screening program have almost equal risk for cervical cancer compared to women who did not participate in an organized cervical cancer screening program. Women with irregular participation in an organized cervical cancer screening program have a cervical cancer risk that is nearly comparable to the risk among non-participants.

有组织的宫颈癌筛查项目对发病率和死亡率的影响:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本研究的目的是评估有组织的筛查项目对妇女宫颈癌发病率和死亡率的影响。按照PRISMA 2020协议,通过检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science对相关文献进行系统综述。使用Endnote20和Rayyan系统评价筛选软件进行重复剔除,然后由2位审稿人进行独立评价。研究质量采用纽卡斯尔渥太华量表进行评估。采用随机效应模型Hartung-Knapp调整,进行随机效应荟萃分析,计算合并效应大小。采用Tau2的DerSimonian-Laird估计器、计算Q和Tau2时使用的Mantel-Haenszel估计器以及基于Q计算I2来评估和量化研究间的异质性。还采用逆方差法。荟萃分析的结果显示,在有组织的宫颈癌筛查项目中定期进行筛查的妇女患宫颈癌(OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.29-0.55)或死于宫颈癌(OR = 0.31, 95% CI 0.16 - 0.58)的可能性在统计学上显著降低。在评估宫颈癌发病率的病例对照研究中发现了显著的异质性(Tau2 = 0.1034; χ2 = 245.42; df = 12, p 2 = 95.1%)。在评估死亡率的病例对照研究中发现中度至高度异质性(Tau2 = 0.1161; χ2 = 20.12; df = 3, p 2 = 85.1%)。评估不对称性的测试结果(Egger’s和Begg’s test, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书