Xuanyi Jessica Chen, Manuel J Marte, Swathi Kiran, Esti Blanco-Elorrieta
{"title":"Evidence for an integrated bilingual language system from discourse tasks in aphasia.","authors":"Xuanyi Jessica Chen, Manuel J Marte, Swathi Kiran, Esti Blanco-Elorrieta","doi":"10.1080/02687038.2026.2624735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent to which bilingual individuals represent and process their two languages within a shared or partially distinct neural architecture remains a topic of ongoing debate. While both parallel and divergent patterns of impairment have been reported in bilingual aphasia, such findings likely reflect a spectrum of representational overlap influenced by dominance, proficiency, and task demands. Critically, few studies have examined how breakdown manifests across multiple levels of linguistic structure using ecologically valid, discourse-based tasks.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study investigates whether Spanish-English bilinguals with aphasia exhibit parallel or dissociable patterns of impairment across their two languages, focusing on naturalistic narrative production and fine-grained analysis of speech error types and code-switching.</p><p><strong>Methods & procedures: </strong>Thirteen bilingual individuals with aphasia following acquired brain injury produced story retellings in both languages. Speech samples were transcribed and coded for phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic errors, and for the word type at which they occurred. Code-switches were also identified and categorized along the same dimensions. Analyses included generalized linear modeling, unsupervised clustering, and supervised machine learning methods.</p><p><strong>Outcomes & results: </strong>While participants made more errors in their non-dominant than in their dominant language, the structure and distribution of errors were highly similar across languages. Clustering algorithms and supervised classification analyses revealed that impairments were parallel across dominant and non-dominant languages. Code-switching occurred more frequently from the non-dominant to the dominant language, consistent with activation-based lexical selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support an integrated bilingual language system that spans multiple levels of linguistic representation, modulated by language dominance. Naturalistic discourse tasks allow for richer characterization of bilingual language breakdown and may better inform both theoretical models and clinical management of bilingual aphasia.</p>","PeriodicalId":50744,"journal":{"name":"Aphasiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12952747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aphasiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2026.2624735","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The extent to which bilingual individuals represent and process their two languages within a shared or partially distinct neural architecture remains a topic of ongoing debate. While both parallel and divergent patterns of impairment have been reported in bilingual aphasia, such findings likely reflect a spectrum of representational overlap influenced by dominance, proficiency, and task demands. Critically, few studies have examined how breakdown manifests across multiple levels of linguistic structure using ecologically valid, discourse-based tasks.
Aims: This study investigates whether Spanish-English bilinguals with aphasia exhibit parallel or dissociable patterns of impairment across their two languages, focusing on naturalistic narrative production and fine-grained analysis of speech error types and code-switching.
Methods & procedures: Thirteen bilingual individuals with aphasia following acquired brain injury produced story retellings in both languages. Speech samples were transcribed and coded for phonological, morphological, syntactic, and semantic errors, and for the word type at which they occurred. Code-switches were also identified and categorized along the same dimensions. Analyses included generalized linear modeling, unsupervised clustering, and supervised machine learning methods.
Outcomes & results: While participants made more errors in their non-dominant than in their dominant language, the structure and distribution of errors were highly similar across languages. Clustering algorithms and supervised classification analyses revealed that impairments were parallel across dominant and non-dominant languages. Code-switching occurred more frequently from the non-dominant to the dominant language, consistent with activation-based lexical selection.
Conclusions: Findings support an integrated bilingual language system that spans multiple levels of linguistic representation, modulated by language dominance. Naturalistic discourse tasks allow for richer characterization of bilingual language breakdown and may better inform both theoretical models and clinical management of bilingual aphasia.
期刊介绍:
Aphasiology is concerned with all aspects of language impairment and disability and related disorders resulting from brain damage. It provides a forum for the exchange of knowledge and the dissemination of current research and expertise in all aspects of aphasia and related topics, from all disciplinary perspectives.
Aphasiology includes papers on clinical, psychological, linguistic, social and neurological perspectives of aphasia, and attracts contributions and readership from researchers and practitioners in speech and language pathology, neurology, neuropsychology and neurolinguistics. Studies using a wide range of empirical methods, including experimental, clinical and single case studies, surveys and physical investigations are published in addition to regular features including major reviews, clinical fora, case studies, and book reviews.