The Role of Autonomy in Defining Work Arrangements and Its Effect on Psychological Safety.

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
International Journal of Psychological Research Pub Date : 2025-12-04 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.21500/20112084.7492
Milena da Silva-Guimaraes, Pedro Fialho, Carolina Moliner, Monique Delfim-Andrade
{"title":"The Role of Autonomy in Defining Work Arrangements and Its Effect on Psychological Safety.","authors":"Milena da Silva-Guimaraes, Pedro Fialho, Carolina Moliner, Monique Delfim-Andrade","doi":"10.21500/20112084.7492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the interaction between work arrangements (in- person, remote, or hybrid) and autonomy in defining this arrangement on perceived psychological safety in Brazilian workers (N = 506; 300 women, 206 men). This study adopted a cross-sectional design, data were collected in a non-probabilistic convenience sampling, the measures used were psychological safety, working arrangements and autonomy. The analyses included independent samples t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The findings indicated that psychological safety increased with virtuality levels. Interestingly, when companies choose to implement remote and hybrid work arrangements, employees felt more psychologically safe than when they chose to do so voluntarily. This research suggests that organizations committed to remote work arrangements promote the perceived psychological safety of their workers. Employees may feel that, by establishing a telework arrangement, the organization demonstrates trustworthy behavior toward them.</p>","PeriodicalId":46542,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychological Research","volume":"18 2","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12863978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychological Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the interaction between work arrangements (in- person, remote, or hybrid) and autonomy in defining this arrangement on perceived psychological safety in Brazilian workers (N = 506; 300 women, 206 men). This study adopted a cross-sectional design, data were collected in a non-probabilistic convenience sampling, the measures used were psychological safety, working arrangements and autonomy. The analyses included independent samples t-tests and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The findings indicated that psychological safety increased with virtuality levels. Interestingly, when companies choose to implement remote and hybrid work arrangements, employees felt more psychologically safe than when they chose to do so voluntarily. This research suggests that organizations committed to remote work arrangements promote the perceived psychological safety of their workers. Employees may feel that, by establishing a telework arrangement, the organization demonstrates trustworthy behavior toward them.

自主性在确定工作安排中的作用及其对心理安全的影响。
本研究考察了工作安排(面对面、远程或混合)与自主性之间的相互作用,以确定巴西工人对这种安排的感知心理安全(N = 506; 300名女性,206名男性)。本研究采用横断面设计,数据采集采用非概率方便抽样,采用心理安全、工作安排和自主性三个指标。分析包括独立样本t检验和方差分析(ANOVA)。研究结果表明,心理安全感随着虚拟程度的增加而增加。有趣的是,当公司选择实施远程和混合工作安排时,员工在心理上比自愿这样做时感到更安全。这项研究表明,致力于远程工作安排的组织促进了员工的心理安全感。员工可能会觉得,通过建立远程工作安排,组织向他们展示了值得信赖的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychological Research
International Journal of Psychological Research PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychological Research (Int.j.psychol.res) is the Faculty of Psychology’s official publication of San Buenaventura University in Medellin, Colombia. Int.j.psychol.res relies on a vast and diverse theoretical and thematic publishing material, which includes unpublished productions of diverse psychological issues and behavioral human areas such as psychiatry, neurosciences, mental health, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书