Can Vascular Vertigo Be Recognized by Artificial Intelligence Methods?

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2025-11-21 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.29399/npa.29122
Aslihan Taskıran-Sag, Hilal Arslan, Hare Yazgı, Erdal Eroglu, Kadriye Serife Ugur
{"title":"Can Vascular Vertigo Be Recognized by Artificial Intelligence Methods?","authors":"Aslihan Taskıran-Sag, Hilal Arslan, Hare Yazgı, Erdal Eroglu, Kadriye Serife Ugur","doi":"10.29399/npa.29122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The diversity of underlying causes poses a medical challenge in the differential diagnosis of dizziness. For many patients, the time to reach a diagnosis is quite long and includes several tests. This imposes a significant financial burden on the healthcare system while delaying the recognition and treatment of some neurological emergencies. In this paper, we present a machine learning-based method to aid in the early recognition of vascular causes of vertigo, which require timely management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data such as age, gender, accompanying symptoms, comorbidities, and commonly known blood parameters, a machine learning-based preliminary evaluation method was designed to predict the most appropriate group for the patient. After identifying the effective features using statistical methods, various machine learning methods (decision tree, logistic regression, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, and ensemble learning methods) were employed to determine dizziness groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experimental results present that age, serum albumin, presence of headache, hypertension and diabetes are crucial features to classify vascular vertigo patients.Accuracies range from 81.7% to 86% and the best result is achieved with the logistic regression method. The decision tree, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, and ensemble methods reached accuracies of 83%, 85.5%, 84%, 81.7%, and 82.8%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study provides reasonable evidence suggesting that machine learning models may be useful in predicting vascular vertigo cases before hospital admission. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and improve accuracy.Our model may be beneficial for ambulance personnel, practitioners and for the specialists facing atypical and difficult cases of dizziness.</p>","PeriodicalId":51142,"journal":{"name":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","volume":"63 ","pages":"246-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12951507/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noropsikiyatri Arsivi-Archives of Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.29122","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The diversity of underlying causes poses a medical challenge in the differential diagnosis of dizziness. For many patients, the time to reach a diagnosis is quite long and includes several tests. This imposes a significant financial burden on the healthcare system while delaying the recognition and treatment of some neurological emergencies. In this paper, we present a machine learning-based method to aid in the early recognition of vascular causes of vertigo, which require timely management.

Methods: Using data such as age, gender, accompanying symptoms, comorbidities, and commonly known blood parameters, a machine learning-based preliminary evaluation method was designed to predict the most appropriate group for the patient. After identifying the effective features using statistical methods, various machine learning methods (decision tree, logistic regression, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, and ensemble learning methods) were employed to determine dizziness groups.

Results: Experimental results present that age, serum albumin, presence of headache, hypertension and diabetes are crucial features to classify vascular vertigo patients.Accuracies range from 81.7% to 86% and the best result is achieved with the logistic regression method. The decision tree, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, multilayer perceptron, and ensemble methods reached accuracies of 83%, 85.5%, 84%, 81.7%, and 82.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: Our study provides reasonable evidence suggesting that machine learning models may be useful in predicting vascular vertigo cases before hospital admission. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and improve accuracy.Our model may be beneficial for ambulance personnel, practitioners and for the specialists facing atypical and difficult cases of dizziness.

血管性眩晕能否被人工智能方法识别?
病因的多样性给眩晕的鉴别诊断带来了医学上的挑战。对许多病人来说,得到诊断的时间相当长,而且需要进行多次检查。这对卫生保健系统造成了重大的经济负担,同时延迟了对一些神经紧急情况的识别和治疗。在本文中,我们提出了一种基于机器学习的方法来帮助早期识别眩晕的血管原因,这需要及时管理。方法:利用年龄、性别、伴随症状、合并症、已知血液参数等数据,设计一种基于机器学习的初步评估方法,预测患者的最适合组。在使用统计方法识别有效特征后,采用各种机器学习方法(决策树、逻辑回归、支持向量机、k近邻、多层感知器和集成学习方法)确定头晕组。结果:年龄、血清白蛋白、有无头痛、高血压、糖尿病是血管性眩晕的重要分类指标。准确率在81.7% ~ 86%之间,其中logistic回归方法的准确率最高。决策树、支持向量机、k近邻、多层感知器和集成方法的准确率分别达到83%、85.5%、84%、81.7%和82.8%。结论:我们的研究提供了合理的证据,表明机器学习模型可能有助于在住院前预测血管性眩晕病例。需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并提高准确性。我们的模型可能是有益的救护人员,从业人员和专家面对非典型和困难的头晕病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Neuropsychiatry (Arch Neuropsychiatry) is the official journal of the Turkish Neuropsychiatric Society. It is published quarterly, and four editions annually constitute a volume. Archives of Neuropsychiatry is a peer reviewed scientific journal that publishes articles on psychiatry, neurology, and behavioural sciences. Both clinical and basic science contributions are welcomed. Submissions that address topics in the interface of neurology and psychiatry are encouraged. The content covers original research articles, reviews, letters to the editor, and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书